[c-nsp] ASR1000 and radius guided netflow

Kimaru Mansour kimaru at gmail.com
Thu Oct 25 08:38:46 EDT 2012


I have to Agree with Roland here, we are applying netflow ingress/egress
per subscriber profile via RADIUS and the CPU overhead is negligible on our
ASR1000. ~20K sessions.

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Dobbins, Roland <rdobbins at arbor.net> wrote:

>
> On Oct 23, 2012, at 1:01 PM, Mike Hale wrote:
>
> > Wait, netflow doesn't  cause any CPU overhead?  Since when?
>
> Single-digit, non-impacting.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
>
>           Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.
>
>                        -- John Milton
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list