[c-nsp] IOS upgrade suggestions for SUP32

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Thu Aug 15 23:21:26 EDT 2013


On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 03:07:38 PM Lobo wrote:

> Are there any compelling reasons to go to 15.x or should
> we just stay with the 12.2(33)SRE8 code?  I recall
> hearing some bad stories about the 15.x code a while
> back but not sure if that's still the case.
> 
> FYI, our core routers are not running much aside from
> OSPF (v3 for IPv6), LDP, and some static routes.  BGP
> was disabled for v4 but is enabled for v6 prefixes as
> we're not running 6PE.  It's as close to a proper P
> router doing nothing but swapping labels as we could do.

I would have said RPKI is a good reason to move to 15, but 
since this is a pure P router, and you'd be enforcing RPKI 
policy at the peering edge anyway (whether you core was BGP-
free or not), RPKI wouldn't be a strong enough reason to 
consider 15 on these particular boxes in your network.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20130816/25d143f4/attachment.sig>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list