[c-nsp] Reasons for "random" ISIS flapping?

[Pete Lumbis]

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:

> Traditionally, "aggressive" IGP timers in conjunction with
> BFD have been such that convergence happens as soon as BFD
> signals its client (the IGP, in this case) of an issue on
> the link.
> Mark.
>

I don't want to confuse aggressive IGP hellos with aggressive  IGP protocol
tuning. I'm all for tuning SPF, et al. timers under the protocol. It's the
only way you get fast convergence. My beef is with sub-second hellos, which
BFD does a better job of.