[c-nsp] 6500, 7600 or ASR

[Mark Tinka]

On Thursday, August 29, 2013 05:38:54 PM Tony Varriale 
wrote:

> It's not an RP2...more of a RP2 lite :)  Also note the
> memory restriction on the 1001 compared to a RP2 system.

Yes - I was considering control plane mostly, assuming the 
OP will likely go with the BGP default of best route only in 
the FIB.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20130830/d2def0d3/attachment.sig>