[c-nsp] Cat 6500 vs ASR

[Chuck Church]

I'm curious about this question as well.  I did visit FN, and was able to
grab features provided by both the 3.6 ASR image in addition to the 15.1
image for Sup720.  Unfortunately FN doesn't have image info for the IOS-XE
on the Sup2T.  I'm wondering if the list is a little incomplete though,
since the 6500 image didn't mention any AAA features.  I find that hard to
believe.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Raymond Burkholder
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 4:02 PM
To: 'cisco nsp'
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cat 6500 vs ASR

> For reference, I have been saying exactly what everyone here has been 
> saying, but my boss wants the specifics :-)

How about www.cisco.com/go/fn

That is the feature navigator.    Other than that, I think you'd have to
find some CiscoLive presentations.  

> 
> 
> 
> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:28:55 -0500
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cat 6500 vs ASR
> From: alumbis at gmail.com
> To: markjohn20 at hotmail.com
> CC: nick at foobar.org; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> 
> I think the problem is that the devil is in the details.
> 
> Both boxes will support most of the same features (VPLS, NAT, Netflow, 
> QoS). For every feature listed here there are caveats that need to be 
> kept
in
> mind when comparing the boxes (ex. for NAT 6k punts the first packet 
> to built state, ASR1k doesn't. ASR1k will scale to larger NAT table
sizes).
> 
> 
> -Pete
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Mark John <markjohn20 at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dear oh dear!
> 
> 
> 
> Yes, admittedly two very different platforms with different core 
> purposes, but in term of support for logical features which can be 
> compared side-by- side, that's not too difficult if you the info. Some 
> gave an example
earlier of
> support for VPLS, but never mind :-)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:41:40 +0000
> 
> > From: nick at foobar.org
> 
> > To: markjohn20 at hotmail.com
> 
> > CC: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> 
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cat 6500 vs ASR
> 
> >
> 
> > On 17/01/2013 11:56, Mark John wrote:
> 
> > > True. So, ASR 1xxx
> 
> >
> 
> > "Compare two completely different things.  Be specific."
> 
> >
> 
> > Oh my.
> 
> >
> 
> > Nick
> 
> >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> 
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by 
> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/