[c-nsp] Experience on ASR9k XR 5.1.2

[Mattias Gyllenvarg]

Thanks for all your input!

Machines came with 5.1.2.
As I am not in production with these machines I can, if it is better,
"turbo" boot to 4.3.4.

Is this the wisest path?

//Mattias


On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Aleksandr Gurbo <gurbo at golas.ru> wrote:

> Hello list,
>
> I had negative experience with 5.1.2 especially in cluster configuration.
> Release 5.1.1 is awful. I had so many bugs on it. Nick, do you have
> problems on 5.1.1 with telnet access to ip address which is on Loopback
> interface in vpnv4 table?
> Also I had problems with MPLS, where remote PE routers have two links to P
> routers.
> All of this should be fixed in 5.1.3. They promised :) I wait 5.1.3
> release.
>
>
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:24:19 +0100
> Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:
>
> > On 21/08/2014 10:43, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote:
> > > I would love to hear some feed back on the 5.1.2 Train of IOS XR.
> > >
> > > This was preloaded in a few boxes (9010) and I am looking for the most
> > > stable train without downgrading (fingers crossed).
> >
> > Hi Mattias,
> >
> > I've had no problems so far on a relatively small deployment of 5.1.1
> with
> > mp-bgp / isis / mpls-pw / l3vpn / v4/v6.  Has worked without incident.
> >
> > Nick
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
> --
> Aleksandr Gurbo
>



-- 
*Med Vänliga Hälsningar / Best Regards*
*Mattias Gyllenvarg*