[c-nsp] BGP default vs BGP full

Adam Vitkovsky Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk
Sun May 22 07:11:23 EDT 2016


> Brian Wallingford
> Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2016 4:50 PM
>
> Still, no need for bgp in a single-upstream environment.  You can use a dual
> default, so long as the upstream-facing interface physically (not just logically)
> goes down, which will automatically remove the route.  If there is an
> intermediate device between the fiber drop and your router, chances are
> the ethernet will appear up even if connectivity is not, which will be
> problematic as the route will not disappear.  In that case, look into IP sla.
>
Well what if the service provider's router you are using as primary is severed from their core (finding all the ways how it can happen is an exercise to the reader).
I think it would be beneficial to receive default route via BGP session -but to make sure the default route is conditionally generated.

adam








        Adam Vitkovsky
        IP Engineer

T:      0333 006 5936
E:      Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk
W:      www.gamma.co.uk

This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as “Gamma”. The contents of this email are confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to which it was addressed. This email is not intended to create any legal relationship. No one else may place any reliance upon it, or copy or forward all or any of it in any form (unless otherwise notified). If you receive this email in error, please accept our apologies, we would be obliged if you would telephone our postmaster on +44 (0) 808 178 9652 or email postmaster at gamma.co.uk

Gamma Telecom Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales, with limited liability, with registered number 04340834, and whose registered office is at 5 Fleet Place London EC4M 7RD and whose principal place of business is at Kings House, Kings Road West, Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 5BY.




More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list