[c-nsp] ospf database size - affects that underlying transport mtu might have

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 01:34:23PM -0600, Aaron Gould wrote:
> Cisco tac didn't want to do ignore-mtu 

And right they are.  "Have OSPF come up, and then drop payload data 
frames because the lower layer cannot transport full size packets"
is about the worst you can do to your customer data :-)

gert
-- 
now what should I write here...

Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20171201/f22d72ea/attachment.sig>