From jeff@xyzzy.bubble.org Tue Aug 20 19:29:51 2002 Received: from someone claiming to be xyzzy.bubble.org puck.NOSPAM (xyzzy.bubble.org [132.238.254.34]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.3/8.9.3.2001112601.msa) with ESMTP id g7KNTmnB009894 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 19:29:51 -0400 (envelope-from jeff@xyzzy.bubble.org) Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 19:29:51 -0400 Received: from xyzzy.bubble.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by xyzzy.bubble.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/20020208/$Revision: 1.25 $) with ESMTP id g7KNTxUk006277 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 19:30:00 -0400 Received: (from jeff@localhost) by xyzzy.bubble.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g7KNTx9j006276 for cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 19:29:59 -0400 From: Jeffrey Ross Message-Id: <200208202329.g7KNTx9j006276@xyzzy.bubble.org> To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 19:29:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [c-ubr] ok, now what Sender: cisco-ubr-admin@puck.nether.net Errors-To: cisco-ubr-admin@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Ok, now what??? From swm@emanon.com Tue Aug 20 19:35:35 2002 Received: from someone claiming to be schlep.emanon.com puck.NOSPAM (schlep.emanon.com [208.158.37.22]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.3/8.9.3.2001112601.msa) with ESMTP id g7KNZRnB010093 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 19:35:32 -0400 (envelope-from swm@emanon.com) Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 19:35:32 -0400 Received: from [208.158.37.120] by schlep.emanon.com (NTMail 7.02.3037/NT1887.00.097ced12) with ESMTP id owihaaaa for cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 19:33:31 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Scott Morris" To: "'Jeffrey Ross'" , Subject: RE: [c-ubr] ok, now what Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 19:35:05 -0400 Organization: emanon.com Message-ID: <000301c248a2$38f46dc0$78259ed0@CCIE4713> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <200208202329.g7KNTx9j006276@xyzzy.bubble.org> Sender: cisco-ubr-admin@puck.nether.net Errors-To: cisco-ubr-admin@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Now we sit back and wait for the exciting e-mails to roll in about the broadband products!!! ;) Scott -----Original Message----- From: cisco-ubr-admin@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-ubr-admin@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Ross Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 7:30 PM To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-ubr] ok, now what Ok, now what??? _______________________________________________ cisco-ubr mailing list cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-ubr From jared@puck.nether.net Tue Aug 20 22:53:54 2002 Received: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.12.3/8.9.3.2001112601.msa) id g7L2rsQO016101 for cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 22:53:54 -0400 (envelope-from jared) Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 22:53:54 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 22:53:54 -0400 From: Jared Mauch To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net Message-ID: <20020821025354.GA15779@puck.nether.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: [c-ubr] welcome to cisco-ubr Sender: cisco-ubr-admin@puck.nether.net Errors-To: cisco-ubr-admin@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: well, there's 14 people on the list so far. three of them from cisco. :) i'm not subscribed so let me know if there are any problems via the cisco-ubr-admin address. tell your friends, tell your enemies ;-) btw, you need to post from the address you are subscribed as otherwise it may go into /dev/null as spam - jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine. From pakucable@nettaxi.com Mon Sep 23 08:05:05 2002 Received: from someone claiming to be ns1.worldgatein.com puck.NOSPAM (ns1.worldgatein.com [203.109.64.23]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.6/8.9.3.2001112601.msa) with ESMTP id g8NC4xKN023131 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 08:05:03 -0400 (envelope-from pakucable@nettaxi.com) Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 08:05:03 -0400 Received: from pankaj (interoffice.worldgatein.com [203.109.64.31]) by ns1.worldgatein.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 10C8213D11 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:12:13 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <014801c262f8$99be6b40$0a01a8c0@pankaj> From: "pakucable" To: Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:28:58 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Subject: [c-ubr] Test mail Sender: cisco-ubr-admin@puck.nether.net Errors-To: cisco-ubr-admin@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Test mail From jeff@xyzzy.bubble.org Wed Oct 9 12:45:27 2002 Received: from someone claiming to be xyzzy.bubble.org puck.NOSPAM (xyzzy.bubble.org [132.238.254.34]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.6/8.9.3.2001112601.msa) with ESMTP id g99GjRDa025857 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:45:27 -0400 (envelope-from jeff@xyzzy.bubble.org) Received-Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:45:27 -0400 Received: from xyzzy.bubble.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by xyzzy.bubble.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/20020208/$Revision: 1.25 $) with ESMTP id g99GkYmD025594 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:46:34 -0400 Received: (from jeff@localhost) by xyzzy.bubble.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g99GkYVG025593 for cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:46:34 -0400 From: Jeffrey Ross Message-Id: <200210091646.g99GkYVG025593@xyzzy.bubble.org> To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:46:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [c-ubr] still alive? Sender: cisco-ubr-admin@puck.nether.net Errors-To: cisco-ubr-admin@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Hey is this list still alive? I don't think I've seen anything come across since it started....(sans my inital email an responses) Jeff From swm@emanon.com Wed Oct 9 13:10:49 2002 Received: from someone claiming to be schlep.emanon.com puck.NOSPAM (schlep.emanon.com [208.158.37.22]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.6/8.9.3.2001112601.msa) with ESMTP id g99HAmDa027283 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:10:49 -0400 (envelope-from swm@emanon.com) Received-Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:10:49 -0400 Received: from [208.158.37.116] by schlep.emanon.com (NTMail 7.02.3037/NT1887.00.097ced12) with ESMTP id bxylaaaa for cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:08:09 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Scott Morris" To: "'Jeffrey Ross'" , Subject: RE: [c-ubr] still alive? Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:10:51 -0400 Organization: emanon.com Message-ID: <02c401c26fb6$d47d2ee0$74259ed0@CCIE4713> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 In-Reply-To: <200210091646.g99GkYVG025593@xyzzy.bubble.org> Importance: Normal Sender: cisco-ubr-admin@puck.nether.net Errors-To: cisco-ubr-admin@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: It's still alive... Just not much traffic... Scott Morris, MCSE, CCDP, CCIE=B3 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security) #4713, = CCNA-WAN Switching, Security Specialist, Cable Communications Specialist, IP Telephony Support Specialist, IP Telephony Design Specialist CCSI #21903 swm@emanon.com -----Original Message----- From: cisco-ubr-admin@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-ubr-admin@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Ross Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 12:47 PM To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-ubr] still alive? Hey is this list still alive? I don't think I've seen anything come across since it started....(sans my inital email an responses) Jeff _______________________________________________ cisco-ubr mailing list cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-ubr From MList@cogeco.ca Fri Nov 1 11:45:13 2002 Received: from someone claiming to be fep4.cogeco.net puck.NOSPAM ([216.221.81.25]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.6/8.9.3.2001112601.msa) with ESMTP id gA1GjCZR007932 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 11:45:13 -0500 (envelope-from MList@cogeco.ca) Received-Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 11:45:13 -0500 Received: from zues2.cgocable.net (unknown [24.226.1.232]) by fep4.cogeco.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 576638103 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 11:45:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from no.name.available by zues2.cgocable.net via smtpd (for [216.221.81.25]) with SMTP; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 11:45:00 -0500 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021101102158.026ce5c0@mail.quintenet.com> X-Sender: mlist@mail.cogeco.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 10:23:20 -0500 To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net From: M List Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: [c-ubr] Nice List Sender: cisco-ubr-admin@puck.nether.net Errors-To: cisco-ubr-admin@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: This is sounding like a Sprint commercial. --Mike From tomaz.borstnar@over.net Sat Nov 2 02:43:38 2002 Received: from someone claiming to be game.over.net puck.NOSPAM ([193.189.169.9]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.6/8.9.3.2001112601.msa) with ESMTP id gA27haZR004830 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 02:43:37 -0500 (envelope-from tomaz.borstnar@over.net) Received-Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 02:43:37 -0500 Received: from [193.189.169.9] ([193.189.169.9]:35848 "EHLO zvezek.over.net") by mail.over.net with ESMTP id ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 08:44:12 +0100 Message-Id: <5.1.1.6.0.20021102084306.03ab13b0@localhost> X-Sender: tmail@localhost.over.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 08:43:52 +0100 To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net From: Tomaz Borstnar Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: [c-ubr] cricket configs for docsis stuff? Sender: cisco-ubr-admin@puck.nether.net Errors-To: cisco-ubr-admin@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Hello! Anyone have any useful cricket stuff for Cisco, Docsis? Tomaz ---- Tomaz Borstnar "Love is the answer to the final question you ask" - Unknown From qmailindia@yahoo.com Fri May 2 11:13:54 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be web12701.mail.yahoo.com puck.NOSPAM (web12701.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.238]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id h42FDrM3002782 for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 11:13:53 -0400 Message-ID: <20030502151357.40046.qmail@web12701.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.187.192.57] by web12701.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 02 May 2003 08:13:57 PDT Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 08:13:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Nilesh Naik To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-ubr] Missing Calling-Station-ID in Access-Request X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 15:13:54 -0000 Hi all we rae using cisco uBR 7246, as our PPPoE concentrator and NAS , we are running IOS (tm) 7200 Software (UBR7200-IK8S-M), Version 12.2(11)BC3, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) on this uBR , we are presently using the Radius Authentication for all the PPPoE dialin Users , but when i see in the debug mode by enabling "debug radius", debug aaa authentication" & "debug aaa accounting" i cant see cisco uBR sending "Calling-Station-Id" attribute to the radius , which i think sould contain value of the customer's MAC Address if i am correct ?? pls correct me if i am wrong here ? now i check out every option on the Ubr to enable this i even tried these following commands aaa group server radius accountgroup server 20.17.92.2 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 server 20.17.92.1 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 authorization accept default ( added this command) ! then radius-server attribute list default and also added "calling-station-ID" attribute under attribute list (Default the one created by above command) than also i cant see cisco uBR our NAS sending the Calling-Station-ID to the radius server , i even tried doing this my-cmts02(config)#radius-server attribute ? 11 Filter-Id attribute configuration 188 Num-In-Multilink attribute configuration 218 Address-Pool attribute 32 NAS-Identifier attribute 4 NAS IP address attribute 44 Acct-Session-Id attribute 6 Service-Type attribute 69 Tunnel-Password attribute 8 Framed IP address attribute list List of Attribute Types nas-port NAS-Port attribute configuration but as u see there isnt any thing mentioned for "calling-station-ID" (31) so i was not able to enable it , so if any one knows anything about this then kindly let me know what i am missing here ? what should i do to enable it so that it starts sending calling-station-ID attribute? regards Prashant __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com From qmailindia@yahoo.com Fri May 2 11:14:06 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be web12704.mail.yahoo.com puck.NOSPAM (web12704.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.241]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id h42FE5M3002818 for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 11:14:06 -0400 Message-ID: <20030502151409.87119.qmail@web12704.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.187.192.57] by web12704.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 02 May 2003 08:14:09 PDT Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 08:14:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Nilesh Naik To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-ubr] Missing Calling-Station-ID in Access-Request X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 15:14:07 -0000 Hi all we rae using cisco uBR 7246, as our PPPoE concentrator and NAS , we are running IOS (tm) 7200 Software (UBR7200-IK8S-M), Version 12.2(11)BC3, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) on this uBR , we are presently using the Radius Authentication for all the PPPoE dialin Users , but when i see in the debug mode by enabling "debug radius", debug aaa authentication" & "debug aaa accounting" i cant see cisco uBR sending "Calling-Station-Id" attribute to the radius , which i think sould contain value of the customer's MAC Address if i am correct ?? pls correct me if i am wrong here ? now i check out every option on the Ubr to enable this i even tried these following commands aaa group server radius accountgroup server 20.17.92.2 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 server 20.17.92.1 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 authorization accept default ( added this command) ! then radius-server attribute list default and also added "calling-station-ID" attribute under attribute list (Default the one created by above command) than also i cant see cisco uBR our NAS sending the Calling-Station-ID to the radius server , i even tried doing this my-cmts02(config)#radius-server attribute ? 11 Filter-Id attribute configuration 188 Num-In-Multilink attribute configuration 218 Address-Pool attribute 32 NAS-Identifier attribute 4 NAS IP address attribute 44 Acct-Session-Id attribute 6 Service-Type attribute 69 Tunnel-Password attribute 8 Framed IP address attribute list List of Attribute Types nas-port NAS-Port attribute configuration but as u see there isnt any thing mentioned for "calling-station-ID" (31) so i was not able to enable it , so if any one knows anything about this then kindly let me know what i am missing here ? what should i do to enable it so that it starts sending calling-station-ID attribute? regards Prashant __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com From adeel_373@yahoo.com Fri May 2 12:10:06 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be web12104.mail.yahoo.com puck.NOSPAM (web12104.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.24]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id h42GA5M3006891 for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 12:10:05 -0400 Message-ID: <20030502161009.90288.qmail@web12104.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [128.107.253.39] by web12104.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 02 May 2003 09:10:09 PDT Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 09:10:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Adeel Ahmed Subject: Re: [c-ubr] Missing Calling-Station-ID in Access-Request To: Nilesh Naik , cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net In-Reply-To: <20030502151409.87119.qmail@web12704.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 16:10:07 -0000 I think you will need to configure the following commands to get this working: radius-server vsa send accounting radius-server vsa send authentication Take a look at the following example for reference: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1839/products_feature_guide_chapter09186a00800b5de5.html Eventhough the example is not from a uBR7246 you can see the NAS(AS5300) sending radius attribute 31 to the radius-server. Hope this helps ! Adeel. --- Nilesh Naik wrote: > Hi all > > we rae using cisco uBR 7246, as our PPPoE > concentrator and NAS , we are running IOS (tm) 7200 > Software (UBR7200-IK8S-M), Version 12.2(11)BC3, > EARLY > DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) on this uBR , > > we are presently using the Radius Authentication > for all the PPPoE dialin Users , but when i see in > the > debug mode by enabling "debug radius", debug aaa > authentication" & "debug aaa accounting" i cant see > cisco uBR sending "Calling-Station-Id" attribute to > the radius , which i think sould contain value of > the > customer's MAC Address if i am correct ?? pls > correct > me if i am wrong here ? > > now i check out every option on the Ubr to enable > this i even tried these following commands > > aaa group server radius accountgroup > server 20.17.92.2 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 > server 20.17.92.1 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 > authorization accept default ( added this command) > ! > then > radius-server attribute list default > > and also added "calling-station-ID" attribute under > attribute list (Default the one created by above > command) > > > than also i cant see cisco uBR our NAS sending the > Calling-Station-ID to the radius server , > > i even tried doing this > > my-cmts02(config)#radius-server attribute ? > 11 Filter-Id attribute configuration > 188 Num-In-Multilink attribute configuration > 218 Address-Pool attribute > 32 NAS-Identifier attribute > 4 NAS IP address attribute > 44 Acct-Session-Id attribute > 6 Service-Type attribute > 69 Tunnel-Password attribute > 8 Framed IP address attribute > list List of Attribute Types > nas-port NAS-Port attribute configuration > > > but as u see there isnt any thing mentioned for > "calling-station-ID" (31) so i was not able to > enable > it , > > > so if any one knows anything about this then > kindly > let me know what i am missing here ? what should i > do > to enable it so that it starts sending > calling-station-ID attribute? > > regards > Prashant > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > http://search.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > cisco-ubr mailing list > cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-ubr __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com From qmailindia@yahoo.com Fri May 2 12:19:33 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be web12708.mail.yahoo.com puck.NOSPAM (web12708.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.245]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id h42GJWM3007544 for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 12:19:32 -0400 Message-ID: <20030502161936.60597.qmail@web12708.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.187.192.57] by web12708.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 02 May 2003 09:19:36 PDT Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 09:19:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Nilesh Naik Subject: Re: [c-ubr] Missing Calling-Station-ID in Access-Request To: Adeel Ahmed , cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net In-Reply-To: <20030502161009.90288.qmail@web12104.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 16:19:34 -0000 Hi Thanx a lot , but unfortunately i tried that too couple of times but that too didt worked , i do not have the cco passwd so if you dont mind request you to copy-paste that part from the web page , warm regards Prashant --- Adeel Ahmed wrote: > I think you will need to configure the following > commands to get this working: > > radius-server vsa send accounting > > radius-server vsa send authentication > > > Take a look at the following example for reference: > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1839/products_feature_guide_chapter09186a00800b5de5.html > > Eventhough the example is not from a uBR7246 you can > see the NAS(AS5300) sending radius attribute 31 to > the > radius-server. > > Hope this helps ! > > Adeel. > > --- Nilesh Naik wrote: > > Hi all > > > > we rae using cisco uBR 7246, as our PPPoE > > concentrator and NAS , we are running IOS (tm) > 7200 > > Software (UBR7200-IK8S-M), Version 12.2(11)BC3, > > EARLY > > DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) on this uBR , > > > > we are presently using the Radius > Authentication > > for all the PPPoE dialin Users , but when i see in > > the > > debug mode by enabling "debug radius", debug aaa > > authentication" & "debug aaa accounting" i cant > see > > cisco uBR sending "Calling-Station-Id" attribute > to > > the radius , which i think sould contain value of > > the > > customer's MAC Address if i am correct ?? pls > > correct > > me if i am wrong here ? > > > > now i check out every option on the Ubr to > enable > > this i even tried these following commands > > > > aaa group server radius accountgroup > > server 20.17.92.2 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 > > server 20.17.92.1 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 > > authorization accept default ( added this > command) > > ! > > then > > radius-server attribute list default > > > > and also added "calling-station-ID" attribute > under > > attribute list (Default the one created by above > > command) > > > > > > than also i cant see cisco uBR our NAS sending the > > Calling-Station-ID to the radius server , > > > > i even tried doing this > > > > my-cmts02(config)#radius-server attribute ? > > 11 Filter-Id attribute configuration > > 188 Num-In-Multilink attribute > configuration > > 218 Address-Pool attribute > > 32 NAS-Identifier attribute > > 4 NAS IP address attribute > > 44 Acct-Session-Id attribute > > 6 Service-Type attribute > > 69 Tunnel-Password attribute > > 8 Framed IP address attribute > > list List of Attribute Types > > nas-port NAS-Port attribute configuration > > > > > > but as u see there isnt any thing mentioned for > > "calling-station-ID" (31) so i was not able to > > enable > > it , > > > > > > so if any one knows anything about this then > > kindly > > let me know what i am missing here ? what should i > > do > > to enable it so that it starts sending > > calling-station-ID attribute? > > > > regards > > Prashant > > > > __________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > > http://search.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-ubr mailing list > > cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-ubr > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > http://search.yahoo.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com From dpeng@cisco.com Fri May 2 17:27:59 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be sj-core-2.cisco.com puck.NOSPAM (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h42LRwM3026300; Fri, 2 May 2003 17:27:59 -0400 Received: from sj-cse-320.cisco.com (sj-cse-320.cisco.com [171.69.88.101]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h42LRxxI005675; Fri, 2 May 2003 14:27:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dpeng@localhost) by sj-cse-320.cisco.com (8.11.7+Sun/8.11.6) id h42LRvc29304; Fri, 2 May 2003 14:27:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 14:27:57 -0700 From: Dennis Peng To: Nilesh Naik Message-ID: <20030502212756.GH26822@sj-cse-320.cisco.com> References: <20030502151357.40046.qmail@web12701.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030502151357.40046.qmail@web12701.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 02 May 2003 18:00:31 -0400 cc: cisco-nas@puck.nether.net cc: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-ubr] Re: [cisco-nas] Missing Calling-Station-ID in Access-Request X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 21:28:00 -0000 We don't send the MAC address in the Calling-Station-Id field. We do send it in a Cisco VSA called "client-mac-address" though, but you need CSCdw44464 which is not in your version of code. It doesn't look like there is any uBR release which has this feature in it right now. Dennis Nilesh Naik [qmailindia@yahoo.com] wrote: > Hi all > > we rae using cisco uBR 7246, as our PPPoE > concentrator and NAS , we are running IOS (tm) 7200 > Software (UBR7200-IK8S-M), Version 12.2(11)BC3, EARLY > DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2) on this uBR , > > we are presently using the Radius Authentication > for all the PPPoE dialin Users , but when i see in the > debug mode by enabling "debug radius", debug aaa > authentication" & "debug aaa accounting" i cant see > cisco uBR sending "Calling-Station-Id" attribute to > the radius , which i think sould contain value of the > customer's MAC Address if i am correct ?? pls correct > me if i am wrong here ? > > now i check out every option on the Ubr to enable > this i even tried these following commands > > aaa group server radius accountgroup > server 20.17.92.2 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 > server 20.17.92.1 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 > authorization accept default ( added this command) > ! > then > radius-server attribute list default > > and also added "calling-station-ID" attribute under > attribute list (Default the one created by above > command) > > > than also i cant see cisco uBR our NAS sending the > Calling-Station-ID to the radius server , > > i even tried doing this > > my-cmts02(config)#radius-server attribute ? > 11 Filter-Id attribute configuration > 188 Num-In-Multilink attribute configuration > 218 Address-Pool attribute > 32 NAS-Identifier attribute > 4 NAS IP address attribute > 44 Acct-Session-Id attribute > 6 Service-Type attribute > 69 Tunnel-Password attribute > 8 Framed IP address attribute > list List of Attribute Types > nas-port NAS-Port attribute configuration > > > but as u see there isnt any thing mentioned for > "calling-station-ID" (31) so i was not able to enable > it , > > > so if any one knows anything about this then kindly > let me know what i am missing here ? what should i do > to enable it so that it starts sending > calling-station-ID attribute? > > regards > Prashant > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > http://search.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nas mailing list > cisco-nas@puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- || || Dennis Peng || || Cisco Systems, Inc. Escalation Engineer |||| |||| 170 West Tasman Drive Phone: (408) 526-6143 ..:||||||:..:||||||:.. San Jose, CA 95134 Fax: (408) 232-2343 Cisco Systems Inc. dpeng@cisco.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- From qmailindia@yahoo.com Fri May 2 18:51:45 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be web12703.mail.yahoo.com puck.NOSPAM (web12703.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.240]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id h42MpiM3002200 for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 18:51:44 -0400 Message-ID: <20030502225150.80340.qmail@web12703.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.187.192.57] by web12703.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 02 May 2003 15:51:49 PDT Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 15:51:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Nilesh Naik To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net Cc: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [c-ubr] Any One using or Tried Using EAP with Radius X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 22:51:46 -0000 Hi all i am using cisco UBR 7246 as our pppoe concentrator after trying for around 2-3 days i was unable to get the clients MAC address in radius access-request, after going through few docs i came to know that it's possible with the help of EAP , so i tried giving "ppp authentication eap" command in my virtual-template defination but now when i tries to connect through pppoe client (winpoet) it gives error 734 : ppp link control protocol terminated on winpoet and following error for LCP on my UBR 7246 logs May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x17B280A8 (0x050617B280A8) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: I CONFNAK [ACKsent] id 2 len 13 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: MRU 1460 (0x010405B4) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP/129 (0x0305C22381) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKsent] id 3 len 18 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: MRU 1460 (0x010405B4) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto EAP (0x0304C227) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x17B280A8 (0x050617B280A8) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: I CONFNAK [ACKsent] id 3 len 13 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: MRU 1460 (0x010405B4) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto MS-CHAP (0x0305C22380) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKsent] id 4 len 14 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto EAP (0x0304C227) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x17B280A8 (0x050617B280A8) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: I CONFNAK [ACKsent] id 4 len 9 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKsent] id 5 len 14 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto EAP (0x0304C227) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x17B280A8 (0x050617B280A8) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: I CONFNAK [ACKsent] id 5 len 12 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto SPAP (0x0308C02701000001) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKsent] id 6 len 14 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto EAP (0x0304C227) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x17B280A8 (0x050617B280A8) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: I CONFNAK [ACKsent] id 6 len 8 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto PAP (0x0304C023) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: Failed to negotiate with peer May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: O TERMREQ [ACKsent] id 7 len 4 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 PPP: Phase is TERMINATING May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: I TERMACK [TERMsent] id 7 len 4 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: State is Closed May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 PPP: Phase is DOWN May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 VTEMPLATE: Free vaccess May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 PPP: Phase is ESTABLISHING, Passive Open May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: State is Listen May 2 22:26:22.133: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-Access1, changed state to down May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 Debug: Condition 2, interface Vt1 cleared, count 0 May 2 22:26:22: VTEMPLATE: Clean up dirty vaccess queue, size 1 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 VTEMPLATE: Found a dirty vaccess clone with vtemplate May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 VTEMPLATE: ************ UNCLONE VACCESS1 ************** May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 VTEMPLATE: Unclone to-be-freed command#9 as soon as i remove the command (ppp authentication eap) from virtual-template defination it starts working so kindly guide me whether i am going in the right direction by enabling EAP ? will i be able to get the client's MAC address in access-request if i enable EAP ? how can i rectify this error ? i tried almost everything that came to my mind but wasn't able to solve this EAP error so kindly help me warm regards Prashant __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com From qmailindia@yahoo.com Fri May 2 18:51:45 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be web12703.mail.yahoo.com puck.NOSPAM (web12703.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.240]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id h42MpiM3002201 for ; Fri, 2 May 2003 18:51:44 -0400 Message-ID: <20030502225150.80340.qmail@web12703.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.187.192.57] by web12703.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 02 May 2003 15:51:49 PDT Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 15:51:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Nilesh Naik To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net Cc: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [c-ubr] Any One using or Tried Using EAP with Radius X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 22:51:46 -0000 Hi all i am using cisco UBR 7246 as our pppoe concentrator after trying for around 2-3 days i was unable to get the clients MAC address in radius access-request, after going through few docs i came to know that it's possible with the help of EAP , so i tried giving "ppp authentication eap" command in my virtual-template defination but now when i tries to connect through pppoe client (winpoet) it gives error 734 : ppp link control protocol terminated on winpoet and following error for LCP on my UBR 7246 logs May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x17B280A8 (0x050617B280A8) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: I CONFNAK [ACKsent] id 2 len 13 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: MRU 1460 (0x010405B4) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP/129 (0x0305C22381) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKsent] id 3 len 18 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: MRU 1460 (0x010405B4) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto EAP (0x0304C227) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x17B280A8 (0x050617B280A8) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: I CONFNAK [ACKsent] id 3 len 13 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: MRU 1460 (0x010405B4) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto MS-CHAP (0x0305C22380) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKsent] id 4 len 14 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto EAP (0x0304C227) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x17B280A8 (0x050617B280A8) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: I CONFNAK [ACKsent] id 4 len 9 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKsent] id 5 len 14 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto EAP (0x0304C227) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x17B280A8 (0x050617B280A8) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: I CONFNAK [ACKsent] id 5 len 12 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto SPAP (0x0308C02701000001) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: O CONFREQ [ACKsent] id 6 len 14 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto EAP (0x0304C227) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: MagicNumber 0x17B280A8 (0x050617B280A8) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: I CONFNAK [ACKsent] id 6 len 8 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: AuthProto PAP (0x0304C023) May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: Failed to negotiate with peer May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: O TERMREQ [ACKsent] id 7 len 4 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 PPP: Phase is TERMINATING May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: I TERMACK [TERMsent] id 7 len 4 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: State is Closed May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 PPP: Phase is DOWN May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 VTEMPLATE: Free vaccess May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 PPP: Phase is ESTABLISHING, Passive Open May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 LCP: State is Listen May 2 22:26:22.133: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Virtual-Access1, changed state to down May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 Debug: Condition 2, interface Vt1 cleared, count 0 May 2 22:26:22: VTEMPLATE: Clean up dirty vaccess queue, size 1 May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 VTEMPLATE: Found a dirty vaccess clone with vtemplate May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 VTEMPLATE: ************ UNCLONE VACCESS1 ************** May 2 22:26:22: Vi1 VTEMPLATE: Unclone to-be-freed command#9 as soon as i remove the command (ppp authentication eap) from virtual-template defination it starts working so kindly guide me whether i am going in the right direction by enabling EAP ? will i be able to get the client's MAC address in access-request if i enable EAP ? how can i rectify this error ? i tried almost everything that came to my mind but wasn't able to solve this EAP error so kindly help me warm regards Prashant __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com From michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us Wed Sep 10 19:01:48 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us puck.NOSPAM (adsl-209-233-126-65.dsl.scrm01.pacbell.net [209.233.126.65]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8AN1lNO024607 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2003 19:01:48 -0400 Subject: [c-ubr] VOIP line always on on UBR924 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 16:01:41 -0700 Message-ID: Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [c-ubr] VOIP line always on on UBR924 Thread-Index: AcN37394P62IO/+ZQ+6QXWVOE6CCRQ== From: "Michel Py" To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by puck.nether.net id h8AN1lNO024607 X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 23:01:49 -0000 I'm having a minor issue with UBR924s: Everything works fine but when hooking an analog phone that has line activity detection, the line appears to be on all the time (the led on the phone is always on). I have tried everything I could under config-voiceport to no avail. It's not specific to my hardware (does it on several boxes). Any ideas, anyone? Thanks Michel. Barebones config between two of them: interface Ethernet0 description internal network ip address 192.168.2.2 255.255.255.0 no ip mroute-cache no cdp enable ! interface cable-modem0 description not in use shutdown no cable-modem compliant bridge cable-modem voip clock-internal ! voice-port 0 input gain -2 output attenuation 0 ! dial-peer voice 1000 pots destination-pattern 1000 port 0 ! dial-peer voice 1100 voip destination-pattern 11.. session target ipv4:192.168.2.3 ubr924#sh voice port 0 Foreign Exchange Station 0 Slot is -1, Port is 0 Type of VoicePort is FXS Operation State is DORMANT Administrative State is UP No Interface Down Failure Description is not set Noise Regeneration is enabled Non Linear Processing is enabled Music On Hold Threshold is Set to -38 dBm In Gain is Set to -2 dB Out Attenuation is Set to 0 dB Echo Cancellation is enabled Echo Cancellation NLP mute is disabled Echo Cancellation NLP threshold is -21 dB Echo Cancel Coverage is set to 8 ms Playout-delay Mode is set to default Playout-delay Nominal is set to 60 ms Playout-delay Maximum is set to 200 ms Playout-delay Minimum mode is set to default, value 40 ms Connection Mode is normal Connection Number is not set Initial Time Out is set to 10 s Interdigit Time Out is set to 10 s Ringing Time Out is set to 180 s Companding Type is u-law Region Tone is set for US Analog Info Follows: Currently processing unknown Maintenance Mode Set to None (not in mtc mode) Number of signaling protocol errors are 0 Impedance is set to 600r Ohm Wait Release Time Out is 30 s Station name michel, Station number None Voice card specific Info Follows: Signal Type is loopStart Ring Frequency is 25 Hz Hook Status is On Hook Ring Active Status is inactive Ring Ground Status is inactive Tip Ground Status is inactive Digit Duration Timing is set to 100 ms InterDigit Duration Timing is set to 100 ms No disconnect acknowledge Ring Cadence is defined by CPTone Selection Ring Cadence are [20 40] * 100 msec From svalliap@cisco.com Fri Feb 6 18:45:29 2004 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i16NjSqr062656; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 18:45:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from svalliap@cisco.com) Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Feb 2004 15:45:58 -0800 Received: from sj-cse-717.cisco.com (sj-cse-717.cisco.com [171.69.88.213]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i16NjKGq027164; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:45:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (svalliap@localhost) by sj-cse-717.cisco.com (8.11.7+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i16NjK017826; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:45:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:45:20 -0800 (PST) From: Siva Valliappan To: cisco-bba@puck.nether.net, cisco-nas@puck.nether.net, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net, cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 09:24:15 -0500 Cc: Michael Timm Subject: [c-ubr] [FYI] Show Version output changes in 12.3(4)T and 12.2(22)S X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.2a0 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 23:45:30 -0000 Hi Folks, this is a headsup that the output of "show version" has been modified in 12.3(4)T and 12.2(22)S. 12.3(4)T has been shipping for a few months, and 12.2(22)S is forthcoming. details on the changes can be found at: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios123/123relnt/xprn123t/123tnewf.htm#1413209 This change may negatively impact custom management tooling that is keying off specific strings in the output of "show version" e.g. Rancid 2.2.2 will not report the correct amount of NVRAM, and will also not report the correct IOS version string This is fixed in Rancid 2.2.3RC1 Please direct any replies directly to me (to avoid spamming the aliases). cheers .siva From helmwork@ruraltel.net Fri May 21 13:26:02 2004 Received: from mail3.ruraltel.net (p36n0.ruraltel.net [24.225.0.36]) by puck.nether.net (8.13.0.Alpha0/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i4LHQ1ME025895 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 21 May 2004 13:26:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from helmwork@ruraltel.net) X-Envelope-From: helmwork@ruraltel.net Received: (qmail 28871 invoked by uid 204); 21 May 2004 17:26:01 -0000 Received: from helmwork@ruraltel.net by mail3.ruraltel.net by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-3.10 (spamassassin: 2.63. f-prot: 4.4.2/3.14.11. Clear:SA:0(-8.9/4.0):. Processed in 0.687515 secs); 21 May 2004 17:26:01 -0000 X-Doublecheck-Mail-From: helmwork@ruraltel.net via mail3.ruraltel.net X-Doublecheck: 3.10 (Clear:SA:0(-8.9/4.0):. Processed in 0.687515 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO ?24.225.5.44?) (24.225.5.44) by 0 with SMTP; 21 May 2004 17:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <40AE3BA8.3040303@ruraltel.net> Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 12:26:00 -0500 From: Eric Helm User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -8.9 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-AWL-Adustment: X-Spam-Bayes-Auto-Learn: ham X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 0 times. X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.9 required=4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0-r10422 on spamd4.ruraltel.net X-Spam-Required-Score: 4.0 X-Spam-DCC: spamd4.ruraltel.net 1187; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Tests: BAYES_00=-4.9,RCVD_FROM_NEXTECH_1=-4 X-Spam-Report: -8.9 points, 4.0 required * -4.0 RCVD_FROM_NEXTECH_1 Message came from 24.225.0-9.x network * -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Bayes-Probability: 0.0000 Subject: [c-ubr] OSS with Cisco CMTS support X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 17:26:02 -0000 What is the most common OSS software for use in a small Cisco CMTS environment? By small, I mean 2000 to 3000 subscribers. Thanks, Eric From helmwork@ruraltel.net Wed Aug 18 15:26:09 2004 Received: from mail3.ruraltel.net (p36n0.ruraltel.net [24.225.0.36]) by puck.nether.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with SMTP id i7IJQ8is041196 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:26:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from helmwork@ruraltel.net) Received: (qmail 12017 invoked by uid 204); 18 Aug 2004 19:26:08 -0000 Received: from helmwork@ruraltel.net by mail3.ruraltel.net by uid 201 with DoubleCheck-4.0 (clamdscan: 0.75. spamassassin: 3.0.0-p3. doublecheck: 4.0.9. Clear:RC:1(24.225.11.141):SA:0(-6.6/4.0):. Processed in 3.399668 secs); 18 Aug 2004 19:26:08 -0000 X-Envelope-From: helmwork@ruraltel.net Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.26.53?) (helmwork@ruraltel.net@24.225.11.141) by mail3.ruraltel.net with SMTP; 18 Aug 2004 19:26:04 -0000 Message-ID: <4123AD4F.4010903@ruraltel.net> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:26:07 -0500 From: Eric Helm User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -6.6 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-AWL-Adustment: X-Spam-Bayes-Auto-Learn: ham X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=4.0 X-Spam-Processed-By: spamd2.ruraltel.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0-p3 (2004-07-22) on spamd2.ruraltel.net X-Spam-Tests: BAYES_00=-2.599,RCVD_FROM_NEXTECH_2=-4 X-Spam-Report: -6.6 points, 4.0 required * -4.0 RCVD_FROM_NEXTECH_2 Message came from 24.225.10-29.x network * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Bayes-Token-Summary: Tokens: new, 36; hammy, 50; neutral, 53; spammy, 3. X-Spam-Bayes-Result: 0.0000 Subject: [c-ubr] Toshiba PCX2200 Cable Modem problems X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:26:09 -0000 Hello, We recently purchased several Cable TV/Internet properties. Since the switchover, we have had several (over 20) Toshiba PCX 2200 Cable Modems that will not come online with a Fastflow provisioning server. These modems are spread over 4 different towns and 4 different Cisco 7100 CMTS. They were working prior to our conversion from the old provisioning company's custom provisioning server. The modems sync up to the CMTS, they get an IP from the DHCP server, but they fail on the TFTP transfer. It starts, but fails after a bit. I can ping the modems in question during this period that they are trying to download the config file. It is a very basic 1.0 config file in question. We can take a Motorola modem to the same customer's house, and it works just fine. Any ideas as to why this may be happening? Thanks, /Eric From helmwork@ruraltel.net Thu Feb 3 10:47:13 2005 Received: from mail2.ruraltel.net (p35n0.ruraltel.net [24.225.0.35]) by puck.nether.net (8.13.2/8.12.9) with SMTP id j13FlBrf072804 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:47:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from helmwork@ruraltel.net) Received: (qmail 12030 invoked by uid 200); 3 Feb 2005 15:47:09 -0000 Received: from helmwork@ruraltel.net by mail2.ruraltel.net by uid 200 with DoubleCheck-4.0 (clamav: 0.81/697. spamassassin: 3.0.2-4101. doublecheck: 4.1.04. Clear::RC:1(24.225.11.141):SA:0(-5.0/4.0):. Processed in 1.226991 secs); 03 Feb 2005 15:47:09 -0000 X-Envelope-From: helmwork@ruraltel.net Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.16.32.2?) (helmwork@ruraltel.net@24.225.11.141) by mail2.ruraltel.net with SMTP; 3 Feb 2005 15:47:08 -0000 Message-ID: <4202477A.4060209@ruraltel.net> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:47:06 -0600 From: Eric Helm User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net, isp-cable@isp-cable.com X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -5.0 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-AWL-Adustment: -0.0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 X-Spam-Processed-By: DoubleCheck Email Manager on spamd3.ruraltel.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2-4101 (2004-12-04) on spamd3.ruraltel.net X-Spam-Report: -5.0 points, 4.0 required * -4.0 RCVD_FROM_NEXTECH_2 Message came from 24.225.10-29.x network * -1.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Spam-Bayes-Result: 0.0000 Subject: [c-ubr] DOCSIS Troubleshooting X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6b1 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 15:47:13 -0000 Can anyone point me to a good guide on troubleshooting DOCSIS Cable Modems / HFC Plant? Specifically, I am looking for what the information provided in the docsIF MIB means and how it can be used for troubleshooting problems. docsIfSigQCorrecteds.3 (counter) 3014 docsIfSigQUncorrectables.3 (counter) 1669 docsIfSigQSignalNoise.3 (integer) 30,4 [304] docsIfSigQMicroreflections.3 (integer) 7 docsIfCmStatusResets.2 (counter) 2 docsIfCmStatusLostSyncs.2 (counter) 1 docsIfCmStatusInvalidMaps.2 (counter) 0 docsIfCmStatusInvalidUcds.2 (counter) 0 docsIfCmStatusInvalidRangingResponses.2 (counter) 0 docsIfCmStatusInvalidRegistrationResponses.2 (counter) 0 docsIfCmStatusT1Timeouts.2 (counter) 0 docsIfCmStatusT2Timeouts.2 (counter) 7 docsIfCmStatusT3Timeouts.2 (counter) 4 docsIfCmStatusT4Timeouts.2 (counter) 17 docsIfCmStatusRangingAborteds.2 (counter) 0 Thanks, Eric From sar@knowledgecomputers.net Mon Mar 14 18:46:42 2005 Received: from van1.sybaspace.com (mail.cvvm.com [69.90.29.111]) by puck.nether.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j2ENkfuo060847 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:46:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from sar@knowledgecomputers.net) X-Envelope-From: sar@knowledgecomputers.net Received: from KCWS6 (s142-179-100-169.bc.hsia.telus.net [142.179.100.169]) by van1.sybaspace.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id j2ENkeU5023878 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:46:40 -0800 From: "Sarpreet Basi" To: Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:46:34 -0800 Message-ID: <006b01c528f0$0ed55050$8501a8c0@ad.knowledgecomputers.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Importance: Normal Subject: [c-ubr] Question on ubr7223 X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6b1 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:46:42 -0000 Hi, Can a Cisco uBR-7223 with uBR-MC11C support DOCSIS 2.0? If not what are the minim requirements for a CMTS Chassis that will support DOCSIS 2.0 Regards, Sarpreet Basi Knowledge Computers Email: sar@knowledgecomputers.net Toll-free: 800.967.6609 x26 International: 250.748.0818 x26 Fax: 250.748.3388 Mobile: 250.709.0336 AOL IM: sarpreetb MSN: sarpreet@hotmail.com www.knowledgecomputers.net -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.1 - Release Date: 3/9/2005 From adeel_373@yahoo.com Tue Mar 15 11:43:21 2005 Received: from web51910.mail.yahoo.com (web51910.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.53]) by puck.nether.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with SMTP id j2FGhKl3058302 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:43:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from adeel_373@yahoo.com) X-Envelope-From: adeel_373@yahoo.com Received: (qmail 66960 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Mar 2005 16:43:13 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=B4/36dUcuYXz0CNPL/8CrGSpCJsPpCF8lsEdt+p24mHzNpT0cUqaonYPvpxpRudjXVtocyot5uW72TW0bwaNgfcijcTsydjS+S6ALCN4m1ha4PZAqpO/TmEvOMyFdTZpXveQ5FCIfs1eZ69gihNvIu2GwjqnXK0URxT1XuycCQQ= ; Message-ID: <20050315164313.66946.qmail@web51910.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [12.5.186.26] by web51910.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:43:12 PST Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:43:12 -0800 (PST) From: Adeel Ahmed Subject: Re: [c-ubr] Question on ubr7223 To: Sarpreet Basi , cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net In-Reply-To: 6667 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6b1 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:43:21 -0000 No, uBR7223 with MC11 cards does not support DOCSIS 2.0. The requirements for DOCSIS 2.0-ATDMA are listed at the following URL: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/cable/ps2217/products_feature_guide_chapter09186a008020fb3a.html Regards, Adeel. --- Sarpreet Basi wrote: > Hi, > > Can a Cisco uBR-7223 with uBR-MC11C support DOCSIS > 2.0? > > If not what are the minim requirements for a CMTS > Chassis that will support > DOCSIS 2.0 > > > Regards, > > Sarpreet Basi > Knowledge Computers > Email: sar@knowledgecomputers.net > Toll-free: 800.967.6609 x26 > International: 250.748.0818 x26 > Fax: 250.748.3388 > Mobile: 250.709.0336 > > AOL IM: sarpreetb > MSN: sarpreet@hotmail.com > www.knowledgecomputers.net > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.7.1 - Release > Date: 3/9/2005 > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-ubr mailing list > cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-ubr > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ From helmwork@ruraltel.net Wed Apr 6 17:08:04 2005 Received: from mail3.ruraltel.net (p36n0.ruraltel.net [24.225.0.36]) by puck.nether.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with SMTP id j36L84KV048851 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:08:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from helmwork@ruraltel.net) Received: (qmail 665 invoked by uid 200); 6 Apr 2005 21:07:58 -0000 Received: from helmwork@ruraltel.net by mail3.ruraltel.net by uid 200 with DoubleCheck-4.0 (clamav: 0.83/809. spamassassin: 3.0.2-4101. doublecheck: 4.1.04. Clear::RC:1(24.225.11.141):SA:0(-3.8/4.0):. Processed in 1.209805 secs); 06 Apr 2005 21:07:58 -0000 X-Envelope-From: helmwork@ruraltel.net Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.16.32.2?) (helmwork@ruraltel.net@24.225.11.141) by mail3.ruraltel.net with SMTP; 6 Apr 2005 21:07:56 -0000 Message-ID: <42544FB9.4060007@ruraltel.net> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 16:08:09 -0500 From: Eric Helm User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: SCTE-List , cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net, cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -3.8 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-AWL-Adustment: -0.8 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=4.0 X-Spam-Processed-By: DoubleCheck Email Manager on spamd3.ruraltel.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2-4101 (2004-12-04) on spamd3.ruraltel.net X-Spam-Report: -3.8 points, 4.0 required * -2.0 RCVD_FROM_NEXTECH_2 Message came from 24.225.10-29.x network * -1.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Spam-Bayes-Result: 0.0000 Subject: [c-ubr] DOCSIS 1.1 config file for VoIP X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6b1 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 21:08:05 -0000 Anyone have a sample DOCSIS 1.1 config file they are willing to share for use with VoIP? Thanks in advance, /Eric From yann.gauteron@net2000.ch Fri Apr 8 09:31:22 2005 Received: from smtp1.net2000.ch (smtp1.net2000.ch [80.83.47.174]) by puck.nether.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j38DVLkT025344 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:31:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from yann.gauteron@net2000.ch) X-Envelope-From: yann.gauteron@net2000.ch Received: from [10.0.0.70] (changeledix.net2000.ch [80.83.47.14]) by smtp1.net2000.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F7533D52 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:31:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42568872.4010200@net2000.ch> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:34:42 +0200 From: Yann GAUTERON User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [c-ubr] Connect multiple upstreams of a single optical node with the same downstream X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6b1 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:31:22 -0000 Dear all, I am trying in a lab with a Cisco uBR-7114 router to assign to an HFC node one downstream and two upstreams (on different frequencies). My wish was that with such a configuration the CMTS would assign every 2 CM on one upstream (upstream 0) and every 2 other CM on the second upstream (upstream 1). After trials in my lab, I have no success. Do you know if this Cisco uBR can support such a fonctionality ? If yes, do you have an idea how to configure it in order to dynamically assign one upstream (or one frequency, if you prefer) to a modem at the initialization phase ? Last question: Would I have the same problem, if I were using uBR7206 routers (with MC16C or MC28S cards) ? I know it is easy to do it with two different downstreams with a config file assigning the modem one or the other downstream, but I can not realize my idea with one downstream and two upstreams. Thank you for your answers, Yann Gauteron From adeel_373@yahoo.com Fri Apr 8 10:35:37 2005 Received: from web51908.mail.yahoo.com (web51908.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.51]) by puck.nether.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with SMTP id j38EZaKj041175 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:35:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from adeel_373@yahoo.com) X-Envelope-From: adeel_373@yahoo.com Received: (qmail 23326 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Apr 2005 14:35:30 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=06aZNOk+6kvSPXBiV+CypX2nqhup1dmLhy0b6hugTpwBykqOlIRA8I2tK99HbW9SzVJugWSXaZO5fBr4mjk+AAxXizITDbhEeQGgLw8veh/0pcJrRVL/FyujwUIMx2ROcQCDmTguMDopB9bGdGsguIPSfcLPeHp5k1RoclUS6CA= ; Message-ID: <20050408143530.23323.qmail@web51908.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [128.107.253.44] by web51908.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 07:35:30 PDT Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 07:35:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Adeel Ahmed Subject: Re: [c-ubr] Connect multiple upstreams of a single optical node with the same downstream To: Yann GAUTERON , cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net In-Reply-To: 6667 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6b1 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:35:37 -0000 Hello Yann, You are probably looking for the Cable Load Balancing feature which can evenly distribute CMs across multiple upstreams statically (at registration time) or dynamically (based on interface load). Please take a look at the following link and see if it helps you out: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/cable/ps2217/products_feature_guide09186a00801b17f2.html Unfortunately this feature is only supported on the uBR7246VXR and uBR10012 CMTSs, not the uBR7100. By the way, if you want to do this statically via the DOCSIS configuration file you can use the "Upstream Channel ID" field in the configurator to assign CMs to a particular upstream port. But this does not scale too well. Kind Regards, Adeel. --- Yann GAUTERON wrote: > Dear all, > > I am trying in a lab with a Cisco uBR-7114 router to > assign to an HFC > node one downstream and two upstreams (on different > frequencies). My > wish was that with such a configuration the CMTS > would assign every 2 CM > on one upstream (upstream 0) and every 2 other CM on > the second upstream > (upstream 1). > > After trials in my lab, I have no success. Do you > know if this Cisco uBR > can support such a fonctionality ? If yes, do you > have an idea how to > configure it in order to dynamically assign one > upstream (or one > frequency, if you prefer) to a modem at the > initialization phase ? > > Last question: Would I have the same problem, if I > were using uBR7206 > routers (with MC16C or MC28S cards) ? > > I know it is easy to do it with two different > downstreams with a config > file assigning the modem one or the other > downstream, but I can not > realize my idea with one downstream and two > upstreams. > > Thank you for your answers, > Yann Gauteron > _______________________________________________ > cisco-ubr mailing list > cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-ubr > __________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest From ben@pdx.net Fri Apr 8 11:36:40 2005 Received: from blue2.pdx.net (blue2.pdx.net [207.149.237.209]) by puck.nether.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j38FaexY053923 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:36:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ben@pdx.net) X-Envelope-From: ben@pdx.net Received: from gizmo (216-190-089-014.dslnorthwest.net [216.190.89.14]) by blue2.pdx.net (8.10.2-SOL3/8.10.2) with ESMTP id j38FQXG11809; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:26:33 -0700 Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:35:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Ben Kirkpatrick To: Yann GAUTERON Subject: Re: [c-ubr] Connect multiple upstreams of a single optical node with the same downstream In-Reply-To: <42568872.4010200@net2000.ch> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6b1 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:36:40 -0000 I think there are two different ways to do this; the DOCSIS way and the Cisco way. The DOCSIS way is to use the cablemodem config file to set the upstream channel. You could put residential on one channel and business on another, or voice, etc. Your provisioning system makes the decisions but you can't change (load-balance) them very easily. The Cisco way is dynamic and doesn't require the modems to know. I believe you have to run something in the 12.2(15)BC series. All of the modems come up on the first frequency, but some percentage (configurable) will get a message to move to the second channel. I believe Cisco has other strategies as well, but I didn't see an immediate need for them. I'll find the docs later if you're interested, but it will have to wait for coffee. As for the 7114 being able to support two upstreams... I think it should work _if_ the right IOS version 12.2.15BC can be loaded. I know for sure that it works with 7246's with MC-28U. Hope that helps, --Ben Kirkpatrick On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Yann GAUTERON wrote: > Dear all, > > I am trying in a lab with a Cisco uBR-7114 router to assign to an HFC > node one downstream and two upstreams (on different frequencies). My > wish was that with such a configuration the CMTS would assign every 2 CM > on one upstream (upstream 0) and every 2 other CM on the second upstream > (upstream 1). > > After trials in my lab, I have no success. Do you know if this Cisco uBR > can support such a fonctionality ? If yes, do you have an idea how to > configure it in order to dynamically assign one upstream (or one > frequency, if you prefer) to a modem at the initialization phase ? > > Last question: Would I have the same problem, if I were using uBR7206 > routers (with MC16C or MC28S cards) ? > > I know it is easy to do it with two different downstreams with a config > file assigning the modem one or the other downstream, but I can not > realize my idea with one downstream and two upstreams. > > Thank you for your answers, > Yann Gauteron > _______________________________________________ > cisco-ubr mailing list > cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-ubr > From xlimitx@gmail.com Fri Apr 8 13:24:03 2005 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by puck.nether.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j38HO3aj079285 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:24:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from xlimitx@gmail.com) X-Envelope-From: xlimitx@gmail.com Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 37so1174043wra for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:23:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZcvPvUbsPKKDSYa/9zrF5J8+KKLg6fTpRha/x/ae3EZpWSADjrvZljjefTdyt5L8Gef0QBuXlxFtmT5Kk+ToYGQKa+KYaDehV2vQv8IU+u5jMdaaNRn+EY/ZWYUEqe2TZg5pSN/dPUs4p1dwipPJJgeklVldwJGrIgUDgeRMX/w= Received: by 10.54.21.45 with SMTP id 45mr106004wru; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:23:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.45.59 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 10:23:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 13:23:57 -0400 From: James Galliford To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [c-ubr] Upstream configurations. X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6b1 Precedence: list Reply-To: James Galliford List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:24:03 -0000 Hi all, Here are some questions for the group. 1. Does everyone use the default settings for their modulation profiles, or are they using the settings recommended by Cisco to allow short bursts to be up to 76bytes in length? 2. What kind of backoff settings are you using? Are you using the default settings or are you using modified range-backoff and data-backoff settings? 3. Are you MTUB settings set to 1600 or are you using 3044, the default that seems to occur in DOCSIS v1.1? Thanks. -James -- "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein From yann.gauteron@net2000.ch Mon Apr 11 03:28:32 2005 Received: from smtp1.net2000.ch (smtp1.net2000.ch [80.83.47.174]) by puck.nether.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j3B7SVKo077270 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 03:28:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from yann.gauteron@net2000.ch) X-Envelope-From: yann.gauteron@net2000.ch Received: from [10.0.0.70] (changeledix.net2000.ch [80.83.47.14]) by smtp1.net2000.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEABF33DE9 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 09:28:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <425A27EC.60400@net2000.ch> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 09:31:56 +0200 From: Yann GAUTERON User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-ubr] Connect multiple upstreams of a single optical node with the same downstream References: <20050408143530.23323.qmail@web51908.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050408143530.23323.qmail@web51908.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6b1 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 07:28:32 -0000 Hi Adeel and Ben, Thanks for the information. So it seems it is possible on Cisco uBR7246VXR. I'll try to make my lab with such a machine, both our uBR7246 and the uBR7114 are running IOS 12.2(15)BC2. Unfortunatelly, I can't access the document linked by Adeel, as I don't have a privileged account on the Cisco website ! Best regards, Yann Adeel Ahmed a écrit : >Hello Yann, > >You are probably looking for the Cable Load Balancing >feature which can evenly distribute CMs across >multiple upstreams statically (at registration time) >or dynamically (based on interface load). > >Please take a look at the following link and see if it >helps you out: > >http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/cable/ps2217/products_feature_guide09186a00801b17f2.html > >Unfortunately this feature is only supported on the >uBR7246VXR and uBR10012 CMTSs, not the uBR7100. > >By the way, if you want to do this statically via the >DOCSIS configuration file you can use the "Upstream >Channel ID" field in the configurator to assign CMs to >a particular upstream port. But this does not scale >too well. > >Kind Regards, >Adeel. > > From JMcMasters@atlanticbb.com Mon Apr 18 11:46:55 2005 Received: from abbrly01 (ABBRLY01.AtlanticBB.com [64.69.124.4] (may be forged)) by puck.nether.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with SMTP id j3IFksmB078829 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:46:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from JMcMasters@atlanticbb.com) X-Envelope-From: JMcMasters@atlanticbb.com Received: from ABBEX01.abb.msad ([172.28.10.3]) by abbrly01 (SAVSMTP 3.1.0.29) with SMTP id M2005041811564300476 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:56:43 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C5442D.D550B0E1" Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:46:48 -0400 Message-ID: <6E52E4E1B15ADE41BD0EACCAD6864C0A01A1EE12@ABBEX01.abb.msad> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Docsis 1.1 Configuration files Thread-Index: AcVELdUOq93LmLEAQWGtlWQUOVkniw== From: "McMasters, Jeremy" To: Subject: [c-ubr] Docsis 1.1 Configuration files X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6b1 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:46:55 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5442D.D550B0E1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Eric, added a post a while back about docsis 1.1 modem files for VOIP. I was curious to a best practice for VoIP files. The UGS, Nominal Grant Interval, Tolerated Grant Jitter and Grants per Interval are a few settings that I am trying to understand. =20 =20 =20 Anyone have a sample DOCSIS 1.1 config file they are willing to share=20 for use with VoIP? =20 =20 Thanks, =20 =20 =20 Jeremy McMasters Network Engineer =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C5442D.D550B0E1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 
Eric, added a post a while back about docsis =
1.1 modem files for VOIP.  I was curious to a best practice for =
VoIP files.  The UGS, Nominal Grant Interval, Tolerated Grant =
Jitter and Grants per Interval are a few settings that I am trying to =
understand.  
 
 
Anyone =
have a sample DOCSIS 1.1 config file they are willing to share =

for use =
with VoIP?

 

 

Thanks,

 

 

 

Jeremy McMasters

Network Engineer

 

------_=_NextPart_001_01C5442D.D550B0E1-- From pryan@rogers.wave.ca Tue Apr 26 17:22:20 2005 Received: from mail-2.on.rogers.wave.ca (mail-2.on.rogers.wave.ca [66.185.87.233]) by puck.nether.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j3QLMIBd011883 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:22:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from pryan@rogers.wave.ca) X-Envelope-From: pryan@rogers.wave.ca Received: from pryanltomp3 (unknown [66.185.87.254]) by mail-2.on.rogers.wave.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F91312C8 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:19:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Paul Ryan" To: Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:22:10 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 1 (Highest) X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: High Subject: [c-ubr] Config File Question - filtering on the cfg file X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6b1 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 21:22:21 -0000 Just a question regarding the filtering of IP's & ports in the docsis config file. If I have a requirent to filter port 25 - to avoid spambots, I would filter port 25 outbound with the exception of my authorized server, as well as deny inbound attempts. Does the config file have the capability for multiple authorized IP's - can anyone provide me with sample config file - jsut to get a beter understanding.... best regards, Paul R_ From xlimitx@gmail.com Tue Apr 26 19:15:15 2005 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by puck.nether.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j3QNFFWg027034 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:15:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from xlimitx@gmail.com) X-Envelope-From: xlimitx@gmail.com Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so131827wra for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:15:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fAnMTZB/dTQ9vLEoELHuU4Nit1tsRU9XCYFOn54Tyh70oZO47XtvJ60dJSTipegjrKlkZLsgFPBqQn84bakY2QRxOgwhEWfHAD3xGqY+5RpaWOplrc9jF5eRSaZRm6ot3va/0nShCdGPPvxlXdbtWcdmv96EoUGyEXcCilNr3uo= Received: by 10.54.44.7 with SMTP id r7mr194930wrr; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:15:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.45.59 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:15:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:15:07 -0400 From: James Galliford To: Paul Ryan Subject: Re: [c-ubr] Config File Question - filtering on the cfg file In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline References: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by puck.nether.net id j3QNFFWg027034 Cc: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6b1 Precedence: list Reply-To: James Galliford List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:15:15 -0000 Paul, I don't have an example config file, but yes you can authorize multiple SMTP servers as far as I know. You should be able to just set up a separate instance for each mail server in your filter rules. On 4/26/05, Paul Ryan wrote: > Just a question regarding the filtering of IP's & ports in the docsis config > file. > If I have a requirent to filter port 25 - to avoid spambots, I would filter > port 25 outbound with the exception of my authorized server, as well as deny > inbound attempts. > > Does the config file have the capability for multiple authorized IP's - can > anyone provide me with sample config file - jsut to get a beter > understanding.... > > best regards, > > Paul R_ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-ubr mailing list > cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-ubr > -- "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein From yann.gauteron@net2000.ch Wed May 11 03:01:43 2005 Received: from smtp1.net2000.ch (smtp1.net2000.ch [80.83.47.174]) by puck.nether.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j4B71gQe062638 for ; Wed, 11 May 2005 03:01:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from yann.gauteron@net2000.ch) X-Envelope-From: yann.gauteron@net2000.ch Received: from [10.0.0.70] (changeledix.net2000.ch [80.83.47.14]) by smtp1.net2000.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE38033E29; Wed, 11 May 2005 09:00:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4281AEBB.3010600@net2000.ch> Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 09:05:31 +0200 From: Yann GAUTERON User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Ryan Subject: Re: [c-ubr] Config File Question - filtering on the cfg file References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6b1 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 07:01:43 -0000 Hi Paul, Sorry for the late answer, I was on a vacantion... If you didn't find the answer by yourself, here is an extract of a configuration file I produced SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.2.4 Integer 4; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.3.4 Integer 2; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.4.4 Integer 0; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.5.4 Integer 2; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.6.4 Integer 2; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.7.4 IPAddress 0.0.0.0; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.8.4 IPAddress 0.0.0.0; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.9.4 IPAddress 80.83.47.128; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.10.4 IPAddress 255.255.255.128; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.11.4 Integer 6; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.12.4 Integer 0; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.13.4 Integer 65535; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.14.4 Integer 25; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.15.4 Integer 25; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.2.5 Integer 4; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.3.5 Integer 1; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.4.5 Integer 0; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.5.5 Integer 2; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.6.5 Integer 2; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.7.5 IPAddress 0.0.0.0; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.8.5 IPAddress 0.0.0.0; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.9.5 IPAddress 0.0.0.0; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.10.5 IPAddress 0.0.0.0; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.11.5 Integer 6; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.12.5 Integer 0; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.13.5 Integer 65535; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.14.5 Integer 25; SnmpMibObject .1.3.6.1.2.1.69.1.6.4.1.15.5 Integer 25; This file worked well for me. The idea was to refuse all of our customers to address any SMTP servers, except the one in our public server range. (To avoid our customer to propagate SPAM, typically). My tests with this config file were successful. Now I have to deploy this configuration file for all of our customers, except the professional ones which could have a legitimate SMTP server. Best regards, Yann Paul Ryan a écrit : >Just a question regarding the filtering of IP's & ports in the docsis config >file. >If I have a requirent to filter port 25 - to avoid spambots, I would filter >port 25 outbound with the exception of my authorized server, as well as deny >inbound attempts. > >Does the config file have the capability for multiple authorized IP's - can >anyone provide me with sample config file - jsut to get a beter >understanding.... > > > >best regards, > >Paul R_ > > > From yann.gauteron@net2000.ch Thu May 12 02:14:42 2005 Received: from smtp1.net2000.ch (smtp1.net2000.ch [80.83.47.174]) by puck.nether.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j4C6Ef3I029014 for ; Thu, 12 May 2005 02:14:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from yann.gauteron@net2000.ch) X-Envelope-From: yann.gauteron@net2000.ch Received: from [10.0.0.70] (changeledix.net2000.ch [80.83.47.14]) by smtp1.net2000.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE95933E7B for ; Thu, 12 May 2005 08:13:04 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4282F536.4020201@net2000.ch> Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 08:18:30 +0200 From: Yann GAUTERON User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [c-ubr] Modem firmware upgrade X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6b1 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 06:14:42 -0000 Hi there, Our network is made of Cisco uBR CMTSes and of Motorola SB5100 CMs. My previous colleague never worried about the CMs firmware. After some analysis, our CMs are running at least 3 different firmwares, some of them are really old. The old firmwares (at least the oldest) need to be upgraded. I know that the new firmware can be pushed with the configuration file, but I was not able to find any public documentation on the web. If some of you know how to indicate in the configuration file how to PUSH a new firmware in remote CMs, I would highly appreciate to read it. Kind regards, Yann From matth@npgco.com Wed Jun 15 10:51:06 2005 Received: from mail.npgco.com (mail.npgco.com [207.192.223.250]) by puck.nether.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5FEp6NE087730 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:51:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from matth@npgco.com) X-Envelope-From: matth@npgco.com Received: from [192.168.100.188] (unknown [207.192.213.7]) by mail.npgco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B0A4B948 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:51:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.323 [267.7.3]); Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:51:05 -0500 Message-ID: <42B04059.1030101@npgco.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:51:05 -0500 From: Matt Hoskins User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000805040600020109020700" Subject: [c-ubr] docsis 1.1 qos question X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6b1 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:51:06 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000805040600020109020700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello: My company is deploying voice services via packetcable and I have a question about QoS. Our telephony partner will not be using DQoS to dynamically create the call service flows. Because of this, I am manually creating two dedicated service flows for the voice traffic in the docsis1.1 config file. I am using the UGS scheduling type on the upstream. My question is this: By using the UGS scheduling type, am I reserving that bandwidth so that only that modem and that service flow can ever use that bandwidth? Currently, the UGS service flow takes approximately 98k of bandwidth. If I provision 50 UGS service flows, will I have effectively reserved all my bandwidth and not have any left over for the BE traffic? Thanks for any help! Matt Hoskins Network Engineer --------------000805040600020109020700 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=utf-8; name="matth.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="matth.vcf" begin:vcard fn:Matt Hoskins n:Hoskins;Matt email;internet:matth@npgco.com tel;work:816-273-0336 tel;cell:816-261-2260 note:To reach our IS Helpline dial: 816-273-0350 x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard --------------000805040600020109020700-- From xlimitx@gmail.com Sun Jun 19 08:53:10 2005 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by puck.nether.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j5JCr9Oh069592 for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:53:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from xlimitx@gmail.com) X-Envelope-From: xlimitx@gmail.com Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 67so336548wri for ; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 05:53:09 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rVvtSi9iWWEd3ZaXyo0oeNihkdC7gobLH02/yfLSxn4Isr0Lr/3X6xj6zO2zk4/OmRxQ4xJjxxIF+jy0iNhvl2luSEvwzzg2FA/2mZEk/SVO9morubMKz5QFDWI/YWUFpMFbY/sV+zTOaiBCWSueXIMNfvxlqzQ3RFoxWgB5/8g= Received: by 10.54.53.25 with SMTP id b25mr2006225wra; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 05:53:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.45.70 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 05:53:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 08:53:06 -0400 From: James Galliford To: Matt Hoskins Subject: Re: [c-ubr] docsis 1.1 qos question In-Reply-To: <42B04059.1030101@npgco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline References: <42B04059.1030101@npgco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by puck.nether.net id j5JCr9Oh069592 Cc: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6b1 Precedence: list Reply-To: James Galliford List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 12:53:10 -0000 Hi Matt, I believe that by using the UGS type of scheduler that the bandwidth is only reserved for when the service flows are actually active and working. Otherwise, it's business as usual and the Best Effort traffic will be able to use that bandwidth. On 6/15/05, Matt Hoskins wrote: > Hello: > > My company is deploying voice services via packetcable and I have a > question about QoS. Our telephony partner will not be using DQoS to > dynamically create the call service flows. Because of this, I am > manually creating two dedicated service flows for the voice traffic in > the docsis1.1 config file. > > I am using the UGS scheduling type on the upstream. My question is > this: By using the UGS scheduling type, am I reserving that bandwidth > so that only that modem and that service flow can ever use that > bandwidth? Currently, the UGS service flow takes approximately 98k of > bandwidth. If I provision 50 UGS service flows, will I have effectively > reserved all my bandwidth and not have any left over for the BE traffic? > > Thanks for any help! > > Matt Hoskins > Network Engineer > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-ubr mailing list > cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-ubr > > > > -- "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein From sar@knowledgecomputers.net Mon Nov 13 15:20:03 2006 Received: from mail.cvvm.com (mail.cvvm.com [69.90.29.111]) by puck.nether.net (8.13.8/8.12.9) with ESMTP id kADKK2GO008825 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:20:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from sar@knowledgecomputers.net) X-Envelope-From: sar@knowledgecomputers.net Received: from your8cfb5dbe8b (vctab165206.smarttadsl.com [69.31.165.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.cvvm.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id kADJQpg5024472 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:27:07 -0800 Message-Id: <200611131927.kADJQpg5024472@mail.cvvm.com> From: "Sarpreet" To: Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:26:58 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-index: AccHWa9hW0/t0g/nT+GzF+35g+Lmvg== X-Greylist: Delayed for 00:52:54 by milter-greylist-3.0rc7 (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:20:03 -0500 (EST) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by puck.nether.net id kADKK2GO008825 Subject: [c-ubr] Help with uBR7111 X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:20:03 -0000 Hi, I have a customer with a problem with his uBR7111, I need to know if it's the up converter on the unit or if it's a config problem.. please help. Information to troubleshoot below: show ver show inventory show diag config ---- Script started on Fri 10 Nov 2006 03:01:34 PM PST elf@zealous ~ > telnet cmts Trying 192.168.1.78... Connected to cmts. Escape character is '^]'. Synapse Development CMTS User Access Verification Username: elf Password: cmts#show ver Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) EGR Software (UBR7100-IK8SU2-M), Version 12.3(17a)BC2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport Copyright (c) 1986-2006 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Thu 20-Jul-06 17:37 by hqluong Image text-base: 0x60008EB8, data-base: 0x61E96000 ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.0(5r)XE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) BOOTLDR: EGR Software (UBR7100-BOOT-M), Version 12.3(17a)BC2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) cmts uptime is 2 days, 5 minutes System returned to ROM by power-on System image file is "slot0:ubr7100-ik8su2-mz.123-17a.BC2.bin" This product contains cryptographic features and is subject to United States and local country laws governing import, export, transfer and use. Delivery of Cisco cryptographic products does not imply third-party authority to import, export, distribute or use encryption. Importers, exporters, distributors and users are responsible for compliance with U.S. and local country laws. By using this product you agree to comply with applicable laws and regulations. If you are unable to comply with U.S. and local laws, return this product immediately. A summary of U.S. laws governing Cisco cryptographic products may be found at: http://www.cisco.com/wwl/export/crypto/tool/stqrg.html If you require further assistance please contact us by sending email to export@cisco.com. cisco uBR7111 (EGR) processor (revision A) with 122880K/73728K bytes of memory. Processor board ID 20755807 R527x CPU at 225MHz, Implementation 40, Rev 10.0, 2048KB L2 Cache Last reset from power-on Bridging software. X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. 2 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) 1 Cable Modem network interface(s) 125K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. 16384K bytes of Flash PCMCIA card at slot 0 (Sector size 128K). 16384K bytes of Flash PCMCIA card at slot 1 (Sector size 128K). 8192K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 256K). Configuration register is 0x2102 cmts#show inventory NAME: "Chassis", DESCR: "uBR7111 Universal Broadband Router" PID: N/A , VID: N/A, SN: N/A NAME: "module 0", DESCR: "Gibraltar,G-20" PID: N/A , VID: N/A, SN: 20755807 NAME: "module 1", DESCR: "uBR7111" PID: UBR7111 , VID: N/A, SN: CAB0526JCN3 cmts#show diag Slot 0: 10/100 Fast-ethernet with RJ45 Integrated port adapter, 2 ports Integrated port adapter is analyzed EEPROM contents at hardware discovery: Hardware revision 1.5 Board revision A0 EEPROM format version 1 EEPROM contents (hex): 0x00: 01 D3 01 05 01 3C B5 5F 49 0F 3D 08 00 00 00 00 0x10: 50 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Slot 1: Integrated DOCSIS Modem Card (ASIC) 1 Down/1 Up Port adapter Port adapter is analyzed Port adapter insertion time 2d00h ago EEPROM contents at hardware discovery: Hardware Revision : 3.0 Top Assy. Part Number : 800-08454-02 Board Revision : B0 Product (FRU) Number : UBR7111 CLEI Code : CNMBCF0ARA Deviation Number : 0-0 Fab Version : 03 PCB Serial Number : CAB0526JCN3 RMA Test History : 00 RMA Number : 0-0-0-0 RMA History : 00 Calibration Data : Minimum: -10 dBmV, Maximum: 25 dBmV Calibration values : 0x9A5B 0x9519 0x971A 0x9207 0x912C EEPROM format version 4 EEPROM contents (hex): 0x00: 04 FF 40 02 4A 41 03 00 C0 46 03 20 00 21 06 02 0x10: 42 42 30 CB 89 55 42 52 37 31 31 31 20 20 C6 8A 0x20: 43 4E 4D 42 43 46 30 41 52 41 80 00 00 00 00 02 0x30: 03 C1 8B 43 41 42 30 35 32 36 4A 43 4E 33 03 00 0x40: 81 00 00 00 00 04 00 C8 0D F6 19 05 9A 5B 95 19 0x50: 97 1A 92 07 91 2C 0C 28 FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 0x60: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF 0x70: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF cmts#config Configuring from terminal, memory, or network [terminal]? Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. cmts(config)#so   ^Z cmts#sow    how start Using 3633 out of 129016 bytes ! version 12.3 no service pad service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec service password-encryption service udp-small-servers max-servers no-limit ! hostname cmts ! boot-start-marker boot-end-marker ! ! cable modulation-profile 2 request 0 16 0 8 qpsk scrambler 152 no-diff 64 fixed uw8 cable modulation-profile 2 initial 5 34 0 48 qpsk scrambler 152 no-diff 128 fixed uw16 cable modulation-profile 2 station 5 34 0 48 qpsk scrambler 152 no-diff 128 fixed uw16 cable modulation-profile 2 short 4 76 12 8 qpsk scrambler 152 no-diff 72 shortened uw8 cable modulation-profile 2 long 9 236 0 8 qpsk scrambler 152 no-diff 80 shortened uw8 cable modulation-profile 3 request 0 16 0 8 16qam scrambler 152 no-diff 128 fixed uw16 cable modulation-profile 3 initial 5 34 0 48 16qam scrambler 152 no-diff 256 fixed uw16 cable modulation-profile 3 station 5 34 0 48 16qam scrambler 152 no-diff 256 fixed uw16 cable modulation-profile 3 short 5 76 7 8 16qam scrambler 152 no-diff 144 shortened uw16 cable modulation-profile 3 long 8 231 0 8 16qam scrambler 152 no-diff 160 shortened uw16 cable modulation-profile 4 request 0 16 0 8 qpsk scrambler 152 no-diff 64 fixed uw16 cable modulation-profile 4 initial 5 34 0 48 qpsk scrambler 152 no-diff 128 fixed uw16 cable modulation-profile 4 station 5 34 0 48 qpsk scrambler 152 no-diff 128 fixed uw16 cable modulation-profile 4 short 5 76 7 8 16qam scrambler 152 no-diff 144 shortened uw16 cable modulation-profile 4 long 8 231 0 8 16qam scrambler 152 no-diff 160 shortened uw16 no cable qos permission create no cable qos permission update cable qos permission modems cable time-server ! cable config-file main.cm service-class 1 max-upstream 128 service-class 1 guaranteed-upstream 10 service-class 1 max-downstream 10000 service-class 1 max-burst 1600 cpe max 10 timestamp ! aaa new-model ! ! aaa authentication login default local aaa authorization exec default local aaa session-id common ip subnet-zero ! ip cef ip domain name synapse.com ! ip dhcp pool main network 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 bootfile main.cm default-router 10.1.1.1 option 7 ip 10.1.1.1 option 4 ip 10.1.1.1 lease 7 0 10 ! ip ssh authentication-retries 2 ip ssh port 2000 rotary 0 ! username elf privilege 15 secret 5 $1$1.7P$2qjz1.N4brEnZ.IKnhJsv1 username ian password 7 053B571B22444C0539061C ! ! ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 192.168.1.78 255.255.254.0 no ip route-cache cef no ip route-cache duplex auto speed auto ! interface FastEthernet0/1 no ip address no ip route-cache cef no ip route-cache shutdown duplex auto speed auto ! interface Cable1/0 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 no cable packet-cache cable downstream annex B cable downstream modulation 64qam cable downstream interleave-depth 32 cable downstream frequency 711000000 cable downstream channel-id 0 no cable downstream rf-shutdown cable downstream rf-power 50 cable upstream 0 frequency 29744000 cable upstream 0 channel-width 200000 cable upstream 0 minislot-size 64 cable upstream 0 power-level 0 cable upstream 0 modulation-profile 1 cable upstream 0 s160atp10millisecond-bucket no cable upstream 0 shutdown cable arp filter request-send 3 2 cable arp filter reply-accept 3 2 cable dhcp-giaddr policy ! ip classless no ip http server no ip http secure-server ! ! cdp run ! snmp-server community monitor RO banner motd ^C Synapse Development CMTS ^C ! line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 session-timeout 32000 transport input all transport output none line vty 5 15 session-timeout 32000 transport input all transport output none ! end cmts# Thank you for your help. Regards, Sarpreet Basi Knowledge Computers Email: sar@knowledgecomputers.net Toll-free: 800.967.6609 x102 International: 250.748.0818 x102 Fax: 250.748.3388 Mobile: 250.709.0336 ----------------------------- AOL IM: sarpreetb MSN: sarpreet@hotmail.com www.knowledgecomputers.net From adeel_373@yahoo.com Tue Nov 14 11:19:41 2006 Received: from web51913.mail.yahoo.com (web51913.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.48.76]) by puck.nether.net (8.13.8/8.12.9) with SMTP id kAEGJfX5054277 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:19:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from adeel_373@yahoo.com) X-Envelope-From: adeel_373@yahoo.com Received: (qmail 97794 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Nov 2006 15:19:35 -0000 Message-ID: <20061114151935.97792.qmail@web51913.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [64.102.254.33] by web51913.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:19:35 PST Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:19:35 -0800 (PST) From: Adeel Ahmed To: Sarpreet , cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net In-Reply-To: <200611131927.kADJQpg5024472@mail.cvvm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Delayed for 00:59:59 by milter-greylist-3.0rc7 (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]); Tue, 14 Nov 2006 11:19:41 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [c-ubr] Help with uBR7111 X-BeenThere: cisco-ubr@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List for discussion of the cisco uBR List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:19:42 -0000 What problem are you trying to solve? Are you having problems with modems coming online? If so, what state are they getting stuck in? Please send the output of "show cable modem" from this CMTS. Kind Regards, Adeel. --- Sarpreet wrote: > Hi, > > I have a customer with a problem with his uBR7111, I > need to know if it's > the up converter on the unit or if it's a config > problem.. please help. > > Information to troubleshoot below: > show ver > show inventory > show diag > config > > ---- > > Script started on Fri 10 Nov 2006 03:01:34 PM PST > elf@zealous ~ > telnet cmts > Trying 192.168.1.78... > Connected to cmts. > Escape character is '^]'. > Synapse Development CMTS > > User Access Verification > > Username: elf > Password: > > cmts#show ver > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) EGR Software (UBR7100-IK8SU2-M), Version > 12.3(17a)BC2, RELEASE > SOFTWARE (fc1) > Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport > Copyright (c) 1986-2006 by cisco Systems, Inc. > Compiled Thu 20-Jul-06 17:37 by hqluong > Image text-base: 0x60008EB8, data-base: 0x61E96000 > > ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.0(5r)XE2, RELEASE > SOFTWARE (fc1) > BOOTLDR: EGR Software (UBR7100-BOOT-M), Version > 12.3(17a)BC2, RELEASE > SOFTWARE (fc1) > > cmts uptime is 2 days, 5 minutes > System returned to ROM by power-on > System image file is > "slot0:ubr7100-ik8su2-mz.123-17a.BC2.bin" > > > This product contains cryptographic features and is > subject to United > States and local country laws governing import, > export, transfer and > use. Delivery of Cisco cryptographic products does > not imply > third-party authority to import, export, distribute > or use encryption. > Importers, exporters, distributors and users are > responsible for > compliance with U.S. and local country laws. By > using this product you > agree to comply with applicable laws and > regulations. If you are unable > to comply with U.S. and local laws, return this > product immediately. > > A summary of U.S. laws governing Cisco cryptographic > products may be found > at: > http://www.cisco.com/wwl/export/crypto/tool/stqrg.html > > If you require further assistance please contact us > by sending email to > export@cisco.com. > > cisco uBR7111 (EGR) processor (revision A) with > 122880K/73728K bytes of > memory. > Processor board ID 20755807 > R527x CPU at 225MHz, Implementation 40, Rev 10.0, > 2048KB L2 Cache > Last reset from power-on > Bridging software. > X.25 software, Version 3.0.0. > 2 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s) > 1 Cable Modem network interface(s) > 125K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory. > > 16384K bytes of Flash PCMCIA card at slot 0 (Sector > size 128K). > 16384K bytes of Flash PCMCIA card at slot 1 (Sector > size 128K). > 8192K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size > 256K). > Configuration register is 0x2102 > > cmts#show inventory > NAME: "Chassis", DESCR: "uBR7111 Universal Broadband > Router" > PID: N/A , VID: N/A, SN: N/A > > NAME: "module 0", DESCR: "Gibraltar,G-20" > PID: N/A , VID: N/A, SN: 20755807 > > NAME: "module 1", DESCR: "uBR7111" > PID: UBR7111 , VID: N/A, SN: CAB0526JCN3 > > > cmts#show diag > Slot 0: > 10/100 Fast-ethernet with RJ45 Integrated port > adapter, 2 ports > Integrated port adapter is analyzed > EEPROM contents at hardware discovery: > Hardware revision 1.5 Board revision A0 > EEPROM format version 1 > EEPROM contents (hex): > 0x00: 01 D3 01 05 01 3C B5 5F 49 0F 3D 08 00 00 > 00 00 > 0x10: 50 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 > 00 00 > > Slot 1: > Integrated DOCSIS Modem Card (ASIC) 1 Down/1 Up > Port adapter > Port adapter is analyzed > Port adapter insertion time 2d00h ago > EEPROM contents at hardware discovery: > Hardware Revision : 3.0 > Top Assy. Part Number : 800-08454-02 > Board Revision : B0 > Product (FRU) Number : UBR7111 > CLEI Code : CNMBCF0ARA > Deviation Number : 0-0 > Fab Version : 03 > PCB Serial Number : CAB0526JCN3 > RMA Test History : 00 > RMA Number : 0-0-0-0 > RMA History : 00 > Calibration Data : Minimum: -10 dBmV, > Maximum: 25 dBmV > Calibration values : 0x9A5B 0x9519 0x971A > 0x9207 0x912C > EEPROM format version 4 > EEPROM contents (hex): > 0x00: 04 FF 40 02 4A 41 03 00 C0 46 03 20 00 21 > 06 02 > 0x10: 42 42 30 CB 89 55 42 52 37 31 31 31 20 20 > C6 8A > 0x20: 43 4E 4D 42 43 46 30 41 52 41 80 00 00 00 > 00 02 > 0x30: 03 C1 8B 43 41 42 30 35 32 36 4A 43 4E 33 > 03 00 > 0x40: 81 00 00 00 00 04 00 C8 0D F6 19 05 9A 5B > 95 19 > 0x50: 97 1A 92 07 91 2C 0C 28 FF FF FF FF FF FF > FF FF > 0x60: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF > FF FF > 0x70: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF > FF FF > > cmts#config > Configuring from terminal, memory, or network > [terminal]? > Enter configuration commands, one per line. End > with CNTL/Z. > cmts(config)#so   > ^Z > cmts#sow    how start > Using 3633 out of 129016 bytes > ! > version 12.3 > no service pad > service timestamps debug datetime msec > service timestamps log datetime msec > service password-encryption > service udp-small-servers max-servers no-limit > ! > hostname cmts > ! > boot-start-marker > boot-end-marker > ! > ! > cable modulation-profile 2 request 0 16 0 8 qpsk > scrambler 152 no-diff 64 > fixed uw8 > cable modulation-profile 2 initial 5 34 0 48 qpsk > scrambler 152 no-diff 128 > fixed uw16 > cable modulation-profile 2 station 5 34 0 48 qpsk > scrambler 152 no-diff 128 > fixed uw16 > cable modulation-profile 2 short 4 76 12 8 qpsk > scrambler 152 no-diff 72 > shortened uw8 > cable modulation-profile 2 long 9 236 0 8 qpsk > scrambler 152 no-diff 80 > shortened uw8 > cable modulation-profile 3 request 0 16 0 8 16qam > scrambler === message truncated === ____________________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited From xlimitx@gmail.com Tue Nov 14 12:38:46 2006 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.232]) by puck.nether.net (8.13.8/8.12.9) with ESMTP id kAEHcjwh075904 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:38:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from xlimitx@gmail.com) X-Envelope-From: xlimitx@gmail.com Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id t12so420421wxc for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:38:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.23.2 with SMTP id 2mr1237589wxw.1163525920390; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:38:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.91.3 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:38:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Nov