From yurtseven@meteksan.net.tr Fri Mar 7 09:08:16 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be reflex.meteksan.net.tr puck.NOSPAM (ns1.meteksan.net.tr [213.139.192.2]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h27E8ARL003250 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 09:08:13 -0500 Received: from yurtseven ([213.139.192.82]) by reflex.meteksan.net.tr (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id HBDU0I00.N18 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:09:54 +0200 From: "Ali Kemal Yurtseven" To: Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:09:54 +0200 Message-ID: <009a01c2e4b3$3a46e9c0$52c08bd5@net.meteksan.net.tr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Subject: [cisco-voip] 1751V codec complexity X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 14:08:16 -0000 Hi, I'm using NM-HDA-4FXS on 3700 in HQ. At the office sites , 1751-V , with VIC-2FXS cards are used. NM-HDA-4FXS card supports up to 8 channels with high codec complexity, 16 channels with medium/low complexity. I need 16 channels at the HQ, so I need to make the codec complexity on 1751's medium. On CCO, the document says I need to configure the VIC by "voice-card" command, however , on 1751 running 12.2(13)T1, that command is not available. I tried to use software advisor , searching for "codec complexity" , but didn't get any results. Has anybody experienced this kind of problem ? Ali Kemal Yurtseven Network Engineer Meteksan Net Phone: +90 312 2979035 Fax : +90 312 2979155 From eric@fnords.org Fri Mar 7 20:19:45 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be bourbon.fnords.org puck.NOSPAM (IDENT:lorica@bourbon.fnords.org [63.173.166.68]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h281JjRL024684 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 20:19:45 -0500 Received: by bourbon.fnords.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 1AEFC1A80; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:21:43 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:21:43 -0600 From: Eric Wieling To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 1751V codec complexity Message-ID: <20030308012142.GA30034@fnords.org> References: <009a01c2e4b3$3a46e9c0$52c08bd5@net.meteksan.net.tr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <009a01c2e4b3$3a46e9c0$52c08bd5@net.meteksan.net.tr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.26i X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 01:19:49 -0000 As far as I can tell the 175x doesn't support the "codec complexity" command. Try using the "voice class codec" command. Example: voice class codec 1 codec preference 2 g723r63 codec preference 4 g711ulaw dial-peer voice 200 voip destination-pattern 21.. voice-class codec 1 session protocol sipv2 session target sip-server On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 04:09:54PM +0200, Ali Kemal Yurtseven wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using NM-HDA-4FXS on 3700 in HQ. At the office sites , > 1751-V , with VIC-2FXS cards are used. NM-HDA-4FXS card supports up to 8 > channels with high codec complexity, 16 channels with medium/low > complexity. I need 16 channels at the HQ, so I need to make the codec > complexity on 1751's medium. On CCO, the document says I need to > configure the VIC by "voice-card" command, however , on 1751 running > 12.2(13)T1, that command is not available. I tried to use software > advisor , searching for "codec complexity" , but didn't get any results. > Has anybody experienced this kind of problem ? > > Ali Kemal Yurtseven > Network Engineer > Meteksan Net > Phone: +90 312 2979035 > Fax : +90 312 2979155 > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > From sjosephi@cisco.com Mon Mar 10 06:42:21 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com puck.NOSPAM (sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com [171.70.145.30]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2ABgL4x022414 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 06:42:21 -0500 Received: from syd-xch2.cisco.com (syd-xch2.cisco.com [64.104.193.206]) h2ABiPtu013153 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 03:44:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by syd-xch2.cisco.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <18CPQLNC>; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:44:27 +1100 Message-ID: <11D2868F916DD411982D00508B694F431BA53CCE@syd-xch2.cisco.com> From: "Josephides, Spyros" To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:44:26 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Subject: [cisco-voip] RE: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 1, Issue 2 X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 11:42:44 -0000 I would like to subcribe. -----Original Message----- From: cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net] Sent: Sunday, 9 March 2003 4:00 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 1, Issue 2 Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to cisco-voip@puck.nether.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to cisco-voip-request@puck.nether.net You can reach the person managing the list at cisco-voip-owner@puck.nether.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: 1751V codec complexity (Eric Wieling) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:21:43 -0600 From: Eric Wieling Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 1751V codec complexity To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Message-ID: <20030308012142.GA30034@fnords.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii As far as I can tell the 175x doesn't support the "codec complexity" command. Try using the "voice class codec" command. Example: voice class codec 1 codec preference 2 g723r63 codec preference 4 g711ulaw dial-peer voice 200 voip destination-pattern 21.. voice-class codec 1 session protocol sipv2 session target sip-server On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 04:09:54PM +0200, Ali Kemal Yurtseven wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using NM-HDA-4FXS on 3700 in HQ. At the office sites , 1751-V , > with VIC-2FXS cards are used. NM-HDA-4FXS card supports up to 8 > channels with high codec complexity, 16 channels with medium/low > complexity. I need 16 channels at the HQ, so I need to make the codec > complexity on 1751's medium. On CCO, the document says I need to > configure the VIC by "voice-card" command, however , on 1751 running > 12.2(13)T1, that command is not available. I tried to use software > advisor , searching for "codec complexity" , but didn't get any > results. Has anybody experienced this kind of problem ? > > Ali Kemal Yurtseven > Network Engineer > Meteksan Net > Phone: +90 312 2979035 > Fax : +90 312 2979155 > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 1, Issue 2 **************************************** From ftb9994577@yahoo.com Wed Mar 12 20:22:20 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be web20422.mail.yahoo.com puck.NOSPAM (web20410.mail.yahoo.com [66.163.169.98]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with SMTP id h2D1MJv3013449 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:22:19 -0500 Message-ID: <20030313012232.5717.qmail@web20422.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [63.147.63.3] by web20410.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:22:32 PST Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 17:22:32 -0800 (PST) From: fred barnes To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-736008026-1047518552=:5264" Subject: [cisco-voip] Lightweight RRQ gets an RRJ after 8 hours X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 01:22:20 -0000 --0-736008026-1047518552=:5264 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi All, I have a Voice gateway that registers with a Cisco Gatekeeper and receives RCF to all subsequent "Lightweight Registration requests" but getsan RRJ to a one after 8 hours. Has anyone seen this behaviour? What exactly is the Cisco Gatekeeper expecting to see in the lightweight request as they use some non standard data in the messages. This has been seen on a number of devices running the GK software 3640, 7200 etc Hope someone can help, Fred --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online --0-736008026-1047518552=:5264 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

Hi All,

I have a Voice gateway that registers with a Cisco Gatekeeper and receives RCF to all subsequent "Lightweight Registration requests" but getsan RRJ to a one after 8 hours.

Has anyone seen this behaviour?

What exactly is the Cisco Gatekeeper expecting to see in the lightweight request as they use some non standard data in the messages.

This has been seen on a number of devices running the GK software 3640, 7200 etc

Hope someone can help,

Fred


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online --0-736008026-1047518552=:5264-- From hcb@unco.de Wed Mar 12 23:09:32 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be pacserv.unco.de puck.NOSPAM (66-74-199-150.san.rr.com [66.74.199.150]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2D49Vv3020070 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 23:09:32 -0500 Received: from jolla.nikojet.com (jolla.unco.de [10.19.76.3]) (authenticated bits=0)h2D49j6n019186 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:09:45 -0800 Received: from jolla.unco.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])h2D49iuF003493 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:09:44 -0800 Received: (from hcb@localhost) by jolla.unco.de (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -5) id h2D49iZd003491 for cisco-voip@puck.nether.net; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:09:44 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jolla.unco.de: hcb set sender to hcb@unco.de using -f Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:09:44 -0800 From: Hielke Christian Braun To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Message-ID: <20030313040944.GB2811@jolla> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Subject: [cisco-voip] qos logging X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 04:09:32 -0000 Hi all, i am looking for a way to monitor and log latency, jitter, call completion and so on as5350 gateways. Basically something like the call-tracker but only for voip. Is there a way to log such statistics via syslog or radius? Or is there a other way to do it? What kind of tools/options are you using to monitor and guarantee a minimal qos for voice calls? Thanks, Christian. From diego@ifxnw.com.uy Thu Mar 13 06:44:56 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be neopostman.ifxnw.com.uy puck.NOSPAM (mailserver.ifxnw.com.uy [206.99.52.175]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with SMTP id h2DBis87012125 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 06:44:55 -0500 Received: (qmail 3780 invoked by uid 505); 13 Mar 2003 11:45:09 -0000 Received: from diego@ifxnw.com.uy by neopostman by uid 0 with qmail-scanner-1.15 (f-prot: 3.11. spamassassin: 2.41. Clear:SA:0(-0.1/8.0):. Processed in 0.327111 secs); 13 Mar 2003 11:45:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO diego) (206.99.52.1) by mailserver.ifxnw.com.uy with SMTP; 13 Mar 2003 11:45:08 -0000 From: "Diego Costa" To: "Hielke Christian Braun" , Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] qos logging Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 08:49:14 -0300 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20030313040944.GB2811@jolla> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=8.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_01_02 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:44:57 -0000 Do you have tried with SAA? http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/126/saa.html Diego Costa -----Mensaje original----- De: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]En nombre de Hielke Christian Braun Enviado el: Jueves, 13 de Marzo de 2003 01:10 a.m. Para: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Asunto: [cisco-voip] qos logging Hi all, i am looking for a way to monitor and log latency, jitter, call completion and so on as5350 gateways. Basically something like the call-tracker but only for voip. Is there a way to log such statistics via syslog or radius? Or is there a other way to do it? What kind of tools/options are you using to monitor and guarantee a minimal qos for voice calls? Thanks, Christian. _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip From hcb@unco.de Sun Mar 16 14:14:33 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be pacserv.unco.de puck.NOSPAM (66-74-199-150.san.rr.com [66.74.199.150]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2GJEWmt030063 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 14:14:33 -0500 Received: from jolla.nikojet.com (jolla.unco.de [10.19.76.3]) (authenticated bits=0)h2GJF76n004438 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:15:07 -0800 Received: from jolla.unco.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])h2GJF7uF026002 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:15:07 -0800 Received: (from hcb@localhost) by jolla.unco.de (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -5) id h2GJF7VP026000 for cisco-voip@puck.nether.net; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:15:07 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jolla.unco.de: hcb set sender to hcb@unco.de using -f Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:15:07 -0800 From: Hielke Christian Braun To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] qos logging / cgma Message-ID: <20030316191507.GC15741@jolla> References: <20030313040944.GB2811@jolla> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 19:14:34 -0000 Hello, thanks for your reply. It is not exactly what i am looking for. I found this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/105/voip_monitor.html The Cisco Gateway Management Agent (CGMA) seems to be it, but it is xml/tcp based Does anybody use that feature? What software do you use to poll the data from the gateway? I could not find any informations on the cisco site about the software. thanks, christian. On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 08:49:14AM -0300, Diego Costa wrote: > Do you have tried with SAA? > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/126/saa.html > > Diego Costa > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]En nombre de Hielke Christian > Braun > Enviado el: Jueves, 13 de Marzo de 2003 01:10 a.m. > Para: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > Asunto: [cisco-voip] qos logging > > > Hi all, > > i am looking for a way to monitor and log latency, jitter, call > completion and so on as5350 gateways. Basically something like > the call-tracker but only for voip. Is there a way to log such > statistics via syslog or radius? > > Or is there a other way to do it? What kind of tools/options are you > using to monitor and guarantee a minimal qos for voice calls? > > Thanks, > Christian. > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > -- Hielke C. Braun VP system engineering Nikotel Inc. | Phone: +1 858 777 1820 4660 La Jolla Village Drive | Fax: +1 858 777 1810 Suite 775 | Ripe: HCB42-RIPE San Diego CA 92122 | Mail: hcb@nikotel.com From jared Tue Mar 18 16:13:04 2003 Received: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) id h2ILD4Lv000436 for cisco-voip@puck.nether.net; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 16:13:04 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 16:13:04 -0500 From: Jared Mauch To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Message-ID: <20030318211304.GC30262@puck.nether.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Subject: [cisco-voip] 7960 sip notify check-sync X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:13:04 -0000 does anyone have a easy to use *nix based application that can do the check-sync notification to a series of ip phones? - jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine. From jared Wed Mar 19 10:32:31 2003 Received: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) id h2JFWVus025958 for cisco-voip@puck.nether.net; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 10:32:31 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 10:32:31 -0500 From: Jared Mauch To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Message-ID: <20030319153231.GB22032@puck.nether.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Subject: [cisco-voip] 7960 sip notify check-sync X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 15:32:31 -0000 does anyone have a easy to use *nix based application that can do the check-sync notification to a series of ip phones? - jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine. From abender@taqua.com Wed Mar 19 13:10:19 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be apollo.taqua.com puck.NOSPAM ([63.101.52.22]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2JIAIU5007059; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:10:19 -0500 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] 7960 sip notify check-sync MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:10:27 -0500 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [cisco-voip] 7960 sip notify check-sync Thread-Index: AcLuLczKUBDKt3QRTOODeSCol8DfcQAFH1yQ From: "Bender, Andrew" To: "Jared Mauch" , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by puck.nether.net id h2JIAIU5007059 X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 18:11:22 -0000 There is a utility called sipsak (sipsak.berlios.de) that will allow you to send arbitrary SIP messages from a text file. That should do the job. It may try to send a bunch of retries, if it doesn't see what it thinks is a final response, but source is included. Vovida also has a heavier app for configuring the 7960's in sip mode, but it uses apache IIRC. (http://www.vovida.org/applications/downloads/siptiger/) Good Luck, Andrew Bender taqua.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared@puck.nether.net] > > does anyone have a easy to use *nix based application that > can do the check-sync notification to a series of ip phones? > > - jared From jared Wed Mar 19 13:16:09 2003 Received: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) id h2JIG9oF007988; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:16:09 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:16:09 -0500 From: Jared Mauch To: "Bender, Andrew" Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 7960 sip notify check-sync Message-ID: <20030319181609.GE1085@puck.nether.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 18:16:12 -0000 yeah, i've tried using sipsak before .. i've never been quite sure i've gotten the syntax correct.. i'm basically looking for a unix version of this: http://www.spettel.de/ralf/projekte/voip/help.html (ideally not gui, more like a cli thing :) ) - jared On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 01:10:27PM -0500, Bender, Andrew wrote: > There is a utility called sipsak (sipsak.berlios.de) that will allow you to send arbitrary SIP messages from a text file. That should do the job. It may try to send a bunch of retries, if it doesn't see what it thinks is a final response, but source is included. > > Vovida also has a heavier app for configuring the 7960's in sip mode, but it uses apache IIRC. (http://www.vovida.org/applications/downloads/siptiger/) > > Good Luck, > Andrew Bender > taqua.com > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared@puck.nether.net] > > > > does anyone have a easy to use *nix based application that > > can do the check-sync notification to a series of ip phones? > > > > - jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine. From abender@taqua.com Wed Mar 19 15:25:17 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be apollo.taqua.com puck.NOSPAM ([63.101.52.22]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2JKPHU5015793; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 15:25:17 -0500 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] 7960 sip notify check-sync MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 15:25:32 -0500 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [cisco-voip] 7960 sip notify check-sync Thread-Index: AcLuQ6kwt588v0xTSS6OCWBllSBZwgAEUSSA From: "Bender, Andrew" To: "Jared Mauch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by puck.nether.net id h2JKPHU5015793 cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 20:25:20 -0000 If you are using sipsak, make sure there are 2 CR+LF's at the end of the message body, and include ALL of the headers, including the request line, just like from a libpcap dump. Turn off all of their "helpful" header processing automata (like via, etc.) using command line switches. Cisco 7960 SIP docs have an example body of the notify message, I think. Regards, Andrew Bender taqua.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared@puck.nether.net] > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 1:16 PM > To: Bender, Andrew > Cc: Jared Mauch; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 7960 sip notify check-sync > > > yeah, i've tried using sipsak before .. > > i've never been quite sure i've gotten the syntax correct.. > > i'm basically looking for a unix version of this: > http://www.spettel.de/ralf/projekte/voip/help.html > > (ideally not gui, more like a cli thing :) ) > > - jared > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 01:10:27PM -0500, Bender, Andrew wrote: > > There is a utility called sipsak (sipsak.berlios.de) that > will allow you to send arbitrary SIP messages from a text > file. That should do the job. It may try to send a bunch of > retries, if it doesn't see what it thinks is a final > response, but source is included. > > > > Vovida also has a heavier app for configuring the 7960's in > sip mode, but it uses apache IIRC. > (http://www.vovida.org/applications/downloads/siptiger/) > > > > Good Luck, > > Andrew Bender > > taqua.com > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared@puck.nether.net] > > > > > > does anyone have a easy to use *nix based application that > > > can do the check-sync notification to a series of ip phones? > > > > > > - jared > > -- > Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net > clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements > are only mine. > From yurtseven@meteksan.net.tr Fri Mar 21 03:54:32 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be reflex.meteksan.net.tr puck.NOSPAM (reflex.meteksan.net.tr [213.139.192.2]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2L8sQU5001955 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 03:54:29 -0500 Received: from yurtseven ([213.139.192.82]) by reflex.meteksan.net.tr (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id HC3CRH00.S5B for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:54:53 +0200 From: "Ali Kemal Yurtseven" To: Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:54:52 +0200 Message-ID: <001901c2ef87$898d7dd0$52c08bd5@net.meteksan.net.tr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Subject: [cisco-voip] QoS X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:54:41 -0000 Hi, Our customer has some branch offices and a HQ connected to our POP's at various locations. Bandwidth of the HQ link is higher than the office links. VoIP is implemented on these locations. When an office starts a download from HQ, voice problems occur. QoS is implemented using "ip rsvp bandwidth" and "fair-queue" , but since these apply to output queue , in this situation, as there is no congestion on HQ link but congestion on office input, voice problems are observed. What are your suggestions ? Do I have to use MLP and interleaving ? Ali Kemal Yurtseven Network Engineer Meteksan Net Phone: +90 312 2979035 Fax : +90 312 2979155 From jpablo.romero@ifxnw.com.ar Fri Mar 21 07:57:49 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be ifxnetworks.com.arforged)) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2LCvlU5019584 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 07:57:48 -0500 Received: (qmail 28876 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2003 13:00:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jprb) ([192.168.50.46]) (envelope-sender ) by 0 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 21 Mar 2003 13:00:06 -0000 From: "Juan Pablo Romero" To: Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:00:09 -0300 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0012_01C2EF90.A8633C00" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Subject: [cisco-voip] RV: ATA 186 Voice + Fax X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:57:49 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C2EF90.A8633C00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi All, Perhaps any of you went crazy before me with something like the following and can at least confirm the following: I have two ATA 186 registered at a 2620 GK. What I’m trying to do is to send a fax using port 0 while a voice communication is already placed in port 1 and I’m not being able to do that. I’ve tried setting both ports in fax mode: 0x0012 (which uses G711) but I get the same error, so I’m discarding a codec issue here. If I only send a fax, everything works fine The most strange thing is that I can first send a fax and while it’s being sent, place a call on the other line and this works fine! Has anyone had a similar problem in the past? Is it a known ATA’s limitation? Thanks, Juan ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C2EF90.A8633C00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi = All,

Perhaps any of you went crazy = before me with something like the following and can at least confirm the = following:

I have two ATA 186 registered = at a 2620 GK.

What I’m trying to do = is to send a fax using port 0 while a voice communication is already placed in port 1 and = I’m not being able to do that.

 

I’ve tried setting both = ports in fax mode: 0x0012 (which uses G711) but I get the same error, so I’m = discarding a codec issue here.

If I only send a fax, = everything works fine

The most strange thing is = that I can first send a fax and while it’s being sent, place a call on the = other line and this works fine!

Has anyone had a similar = problem in the past? Is it a known ATA’s = limitation?

 

Thanks,

 

Juan<= /p>

------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C2EF90.A8633C00-- From dwing@cisco.com Fri Mar 21 15:17:53 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be sj-core-2.cisco.com puck.NOSPAM (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2LKHqU5019262 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:17:52 -0500 Received: from mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com [171.71.163.14]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2LKI2mW000288; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:18:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from DWINGW2K4 ([171.69.33.48]) by mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.1-GA) with SMTP id AFI86238; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:16:44 -0800 (PST) From: "Dan Wing" To: "Ali Kemal Yurtseven" , Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] QoS Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:18:02 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <001901c2ef87$898d7dd0$52c08bd5@net.meteksan.net.tr> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 20:17:53 -0000 Unfortunately you didn't indicate which products or call signaling you're using, but only a few of our VoIP products signal RSVP. You should configure the voice gateways (or IP phones) to send voice media with specific IP ToS bits and queue those marked packets ahead of non-marked packets using LLQ. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/voice-qos/voip-mlppp.html#llq_cfg -d > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net > [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Ali Kemal > Yurtseven > Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:55 AM > To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > Subject: [cisco-voip] QoS > > > Hi, > > Our customer has some branch offices and a HQ connected to our > POP's at various locations. Bandwidth of the HQ link is higher than the > office links. VoIP is implemented on these locations. When an office > starts a download from HQ, voice problems occur. QoS is implemented > using "ip rsvp bandwidth" and "fair-queue" , but since these apply to > output queue , in this situation, as there is no congestion on HQ link > but congestion on office input, voice problems are observed. What are > your suggestions ? Do I have to use MLP and interleaving ? > > Ali Kemal Yurtseven > Network Engineer > Meteksan Net > Phone: +90 312 2979035 > Fax : +90 312 2979155 > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip From jlewis@lewis.org Fri Mar 21 19:40:48 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be redhat1.mmaero.com puck.NOSPAM (IDENT:root@redhat1.mmaero.com [208.152.224.2]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2M0eleM016190 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:40:48 -0500 Received: from localhost (jlewis@localhost) by redhat1.mmaero.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h2M0feF16592 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:41:40 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: redhat1.mmaero.com: jlewis owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:41:40 -0500 (EST) From: jlewis@lewis.org X-X-Sender: jlewis@redhat1.mmaero.com To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: [cisco-voip] VOIP QoS questions X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 00:40:48 -0000 I'm testing out QoS following the example at http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/voice-qos/voip-qos-fr-atm.html. My setup is a 7206vxr (12.2(14)S), PA-MC-T3, M13 MUX, 1602 (12.2(16), wic-1T, and an Adtran TSU LT. I've setup both ends following the "Frame Relay Connected Router" example config, with the only real difference being that circuit I'm simulating is a 384k CIR frame. The first odd thing I've noticed is that the LLQ service policy doesn't work as expected. i.e. I expected it to reserve at least the bandwidth specified in the priority statement for that class of packets. Instead, packets in that class seem to get only the reserved bandwith...and not even all of it. i.e. policy-map VOIP class voice priority 64 class class-default fair-queue An FTP transfer who's packets all fall in the voice class runs at about 4KB/s. With the priority set to 256, I get 27KB/s in the voice class. An FTP transfer who's packets are not in the voice class will run along at 35KB/s if they're the only traffic...30KB/s if there's a voice class transfer going on at the same time. The LLQ policy does seem to do a reasonable job of reserving bandwidth...several other FTP transfers not in the voice class will take a back seat to the voice class packets, except in the case where priority is small enough (64) that packets outside the voice class actually get better throughput than those in the class. Another oddity I noticed is that if I configure the test circuit as a 6 channel HDLC circuit, I can FTP at 44KB/s. With the MLPPP over frame setup with [adapted from the example in the URL above] map-class frame-relay mlp no frame-relay adaptive-shaping frame-relay cir 384000 frame-relay bc 3840 frame-relay be 0 the best I can get is 35KB/s for packets not in the voice class or with the service policy disabled. If I change this to the sort of map-class we'd normally use to shape a frame customer, i.e. map-class frame-relay mlp frame-relay traffic-rate 384000 384000 no frame-relay adaptive-shaping then non voice class throughput goes up to about 40KB/s, but the voice class throughput falls to about 3KB/s. Most of the testing I've done (all the numbers above) are downloading data linux->7200->1600->linux. Am I missing something in the config, or is the IOS version just not working properly? It seems I have to bump the priority up to about 110 to actually get 64kbit/s reserved, and overall, I'm losing about 80kbit/s of the 384k circuit's capacity. Here's most of the config from the 7206...irrelevant parts clipped. boot system flash slot0:c7200-p-mz.122-14.S.bin class-map match-all voice match access-group 105 ! policy-map VOIP class voice priority 64 class class-default fair-queue ! frame-relay switching ! controller T3 2/0 cablelength 10 t1 1 channel-group 0 timeslots 1-24 ! interface Serial2/0/1:0 no ip address encapsulation frame-relay IETF frame-relay traffic-shaping frame-relay lmi-type ansi frame-relay intf-type dce ! interface Serial2/0/1:0.1 point-to-point frame-relay interface-dlci 16 ppp Virtual-Template1 class mlp ! interface Virtual-Template1 bandwidth 384 ip unnumbered Loopback0 no ip route-cache ip tcp header-compression iphc-format load-interval 30 max-reserved-bandwidth 99 service-policy output VOIP ppp multilink ppp multilink fragment-delay 10 ppp multilink interleave ip rtp header-compression iphc-format ! map-class frame-relay mlp no frame-relay adaptive-shaping frame-relay cir 384000 frame-relay bc 3840 frame-relay be 0 ! access-list 105 permit ip host 209.208.3.58 any ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis *jlewis@lewis.org*| I route System Administrator | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ From ShaneBreen@comcast.net Fri Mar 21 22:32:43 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be smtp.comcast.net puck.NOSPAM (smtp-out.comcast.net [24.153.64.115]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2M3WheM028408 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 22:32:43 -0500 Received: from SHANE (c-24-98-255-222.atl.client2.attbi.com [24.98.255.222]) by mtaout09.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003)) with SMTP id <0HC400LSYSJW91@mtaout09.icomcast.net> for cisco-voip@puck.nether.net; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 22:33:32 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 22:33:58 -0500 From: Shane Breen To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Message-id: <03b601c2f023$dfc0eec0$deff6218@SHANE> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal Subject: [cisco-voip] WTS: ****NEW CISCO AS5350's**** X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 03:32:44 -0000 These Cisco gateways are brand new with 90 day factory warranty:0) AS535-2E1-60-AC $8,900 AS535-2T1-48-AC $8,800 AS535-4E1-120-AC $16,500 AS535-4T1-96-AC $15,500 AS535-8E1-216-AC $26,500 AS535-8T1-192-AC $25,500 Please let me know these are available for immediate delivery world wide. Thanks You, Shane Breen 404-808-4022 shanebreen@comcast.net From ftb9994577@yahoo.com Mon Mar 31 18:59:06 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be web20418.mail.yahoo.com puck.NOSPAM (web20406.mail.yahoo.com [66.163.169.94]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id h2VNx5Ea005231 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 18:59:06 -0500 Message-ID: <20030401000044.50808.qmail@web20418.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [63.147.63.3] by web20406.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:00:44 PST Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:00:44 -0800 (PST) From: fred barnes To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1081371964-1049155244=:50721" Subject: [cisco-voip] How do I change SIP firmware to MGCP firmware on a 7960 phone X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 23:59:07 -0000 --0-1081371964-1049155244=:50721 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi All, I have entered the mgcp binary filename OS79XX.TXT in the TFTP server and yet when I reboot the 7960 SIP phone it query's this file but never tries to load the MGCP binary. Am I missing something? Does anyone have a guide to how to configure the file so as to allow this change. I cannot find a way to delete the firmware, just how to remove the config on the Cisco TAC site. All suggestions appreciated. Fred --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! --0-1081371964-1049155244=:50721 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

Hi All,

I have entered the mgcp binary filename  OS79XX.TXT in the TFTP server and yet when I reboot the 7960 SIP phone it query's this file but never tries to load the MGCP binary. Am I missing something?

Does anyone have a guide to how to configure the file so as to allow this change.

I cannot find a way to delete the firmware, just how to remove the config on the Cisco TAC site.

All suggestions appreciated.

Fred


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! --0-1081371964-1049155244=:50721-- From jared Mon Mar 31 19:15:59 2003 Received: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) id h310FxOs006642; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 19:15:59 -0500 Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 19:15:58 -0500 From: Jared Mauch To: fred barnes Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] How do I change SIP firmware to MGCP firmware on a 7960 phone Message-ID: <20030401001558.GC5939@puck.nether.net> References: <20030401000044.50808.qmail@web20418.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030401000044.50808.qmail@web20418.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 00:15:59 -0000 On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 04:00:44PM -0800, fred barnes wrote: > > Hi All, > > I have entered the mgcp binary filename OS79XX.TXT in the TFTP server and yet when I reboot the 7960 SIP phone it query's this file but never tries to load the MGCP binary. Am I missing something? > > Does anyone have a guide to how to configure the file so as to allow this change. > > I cannot find a way to delete the firmware, just how to remove the config on the Cisco TAC site. > > All suggestions appreciated. You want the P0S (note the zero) image in your OS79XX.TXT (mine has P0S30203) then make sure you have this line in your SIPDefault or your SIPxxyyzz.cnf file (or similar). image_version: P0S3-04-2-00 - jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine. From cisco@peakpeak.com Tue Apr 1 13:30:35 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be gash2.peakpeak.com puck.NOSPAM (mail.peakpeak.com [207.174.178.17]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h31IUYEa026773 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:30:34 -0500 Received: from LONGS.peakpeak.com (vaio.peakpeak.com [207.174.178.127]) by gash2.peakpeak.com (8.9.3/8.9.3.1) with ESMTP id LAA19684 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 11:32:17 -0700 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030401112904.03cb9da8@pop.peakpeak.com> X-Sender: cisco@pop.peakpeak.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 11:29:55 -0700 To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net From: Cisco Geek Rotation In-Reply-To: <200304011700.h31H0KEc020189@puck.nether.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: [cisco-voip] VoIP question -> Autoattendant X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 18:30:35 -0000 Has anyone run across an autoattendant that can be used with VoIP and/or SIPage to handle and route calls? What are people doing to get this functionality? Chris From jlewis@lewis.org Mon May 5 13:56:15 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be redhat1.mmaero.com puck.NOSPAM (IDENT:root@redhat1.mmaero.com [208.152.224.2]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h45HuEOc007772; Mon, 5 May 2003 13:56:15 -0400 Received: from localhost (jlewis@localhost) by redhat1.mmaero.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h45HubL26531; Mon, 5 May 2003 13:56:37 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: redhat1.mmaero.com: jlewis owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 13:56:37 -0400 (EDT) From: jlewis@lewis.org X-X-Sender: jlewis@redhat1.mmaero.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: [cisco-voip] CBWFQ + 3640 + subinterfaces X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 17:56:15 -0000 Anyone know if there's an IOS for the 3640 that will do service policies (CBWFQ) on ATM subinterfaces? I know 12.2S on the 7200 series can do this...but there is no S for the 3640. Maybe one of the later 12.2[insert random letter] trains? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis *jlewis@lewis.org*| I route System Administrator | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ From fizquierdo@datagrama-networks.com Mon May 5 15:35:29 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be anguita.dti2.net puck.NOSPAM ([81.24.162.8]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h45JZROc015031; Mon, 5 May 2003 15:35:28 -0400 Received: from datagrama-networks.com by sanrafael_fax with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v6.0.8.R); Mon, 05 May 2003 21:35:44 +0200 Received: from datagrama-networks.com [81.24.160.66] by datagrama-networks.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.13) id AD0C1B85011E; Mon, 05 May 2003 21:35:40 +0200 Message-ID: <3EB6BD02.4000708@datagrama-networks.com> Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 21:35:30 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?F=E9lix_Izquierdo?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jlewis@lewis.org References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Return-Path: fizquierdo@datagrama-networks.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by puck.nether.net id h45JZROc015031 cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] Re: [nsp] CBWFQ + 3640 + subinterfaces X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 19:35:30 -0000 12.2M can do it, and of course 12.2T. Félix jlewis@lewis.org wrote: > Anyone know if there's an IOS for the 3640 that will do service policies > (CBWFQ) on ATM subinterfaces? I know 12.2S on the 7200 series can do > this...but there is no S for the 3640. Maybe one of the later 12.2[insert > random letter] trains? > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jon Lewis *jlewis@lewis.org*| I route > System Administrator | therefore you are > Atlantic Net | > _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > From jlewis@lewis.org Mon May 5 16:34:36 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be redhat1.mmaero.com puck.NOSPAM (IDENT:root@redhat1.mmaero.com [208.152.224.2]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h45KYZOc019598; Mon, 5 May 2003 16:34:35 -0400 Received: from localhost (jlewis@localhost) by redhat1.mmaero.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h45KYo627185; Mon, 5 May 2003 16:34:51 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: redhat1.mmaero.com: jlewis owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 16:34:50 -0400 (EDT) From: jlewis@lewis.org X-X-Sender: jlewis@redhat1.mmaero.com To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?F=E9lix_Izquierdo?= In-Reply-To: <3EB6BD02.4000708@datagrama-networks.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] Re: [nsp] CBWFQ + 3640 + subinterfaces X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 20:34:36 -0000 Using c3640-js-mz.122-12.bin, the command is accepted, but does not become part of the running config. i.e. it's accepted and ignored. I should add, this is a subinterface on an ATM DS3. Perhaps upgrading to c3640-js-mz.122-16.bin will fix it? On Mon, 5 May 2003, Félix Izquierdo wrote: > 12.2M can do it, and of course 12.2T. > > Félix > > > jlewis@lewis.org wrote: > > Anyone know if there's an IOS for the 3640 that will do service policies > > (CBWFQ) on ATM subinterfaces? I know 12.2S on the 7200 series can do > > this...but there is no S for the 3640. Maybe one of the later 12.2[insert > > random letter] trains? > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Jon Lewis *jlewis@lewis.org*| I route > > System Administrator | therefore you are > > Atlantic Net | > > _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis *jlewis@lewis.org*| I route System Administrator | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ From Francesco_Basili@alliedtelesyn.com Wed May 14 06:07:06 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be svr-wa-owa1.usa.alliedtelesyn.com puck.NOSPAM (mail.alliedtelesyn.com [67.105.133.98]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4EA75Tb023744 for ; Wed, 14 May 2003 06:07:06 -0400 Received: from svr-wa-e2k1.usa.alliedtelesyn.com ([149.35.31.3]) by svr-wa-owa1.usa.alliedtelesyn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Wed, 14 May 2003 03:07:15 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C31A4B.93BCD000" Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 12:04:00 -0700 Message-ID: <2D2400732F67504EA11CF37BF66D95A802D97945@svr-wa-e2k1.usa.alliedtelesyn.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: how to disable RTCP Thread-Index: AcMaAJYZydLJN4lBTFO3DMLd4Vni3g== From: "Basili Francesco" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 May 2003 10:07:15.0715 (UTC) FILETIME=[987CE530:01C31A00] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 17 May 2003 10:27:45 -0400 Subject: [cisco-voip] how to disable RTCP X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 10:07:07 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C31A4B.93BCD000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, does anyone know how to disable the RTCP protocol on cisco 2600 series configured as H.323 terminal (FXS pic)? thanks Francesco ------_=_NextPart_001_01C31A4B.93BCD000 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable how to disable RTCP

Hi,
does anyone know how to disable the RTCP protocol on = cisco 2600 series
configured as H.323 terminal (FXS pic)?

thanks
Francesco

------_=_NextPart_001_01C31A4B.93BCD000-- From wsisk@cisco.com Mon May 19 10:48:10 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be rooster.cisco.com puck.NOSPAM (bantam.cisco.com [64.102.19.199]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4JEm9Dp002142 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 10:48:10 -0400 Received: from wsiskpc (dhcp-64-102-50-160.cisco.com [64.102.50.160]) by rooster.cisco.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id h4JEmGH29885; Mon, 19 May 2003 10:48:16 -0400 (EDT) From: "Wes Sisk" To: "Basili Francesco" , Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] how to disable RTCP Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 10:48:16 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0150_01C31DF4.27726520" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <2D2400732F67504EA11CF37BF66D95A802D97945@svr-wa-e2k1.usa.alliedtelesyn.com> X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 14:48:10 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0150_01C31DF4.27726520 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit how to disable RTCPI do not believe this is possible. /Wes -----Original Message----- From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Basili Francesco Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 3:04 PM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] how to disable RTCP Hi, does anyone know how to disable the RTCP protocol on cisco 2600 series configured as H.323 terminal (FXS pic)? thanks Francesco ------=_NextPart_000_0150_01C31DF4.27726520 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable how to disable RTCP
I do=20 not believe this is possible. /Wes
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net=20 [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Basili=20 Francesco
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 3:04 = PM
To:=20 cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] how to = disable=20 RTCP

Hi,
does anyone know how = to disable=20 the RTCP protocol on cisco 2600 series
configured as=20 H.323 terminal (FXS pic)?

thanks
Francesco=20

------=_NextPart_000_0150_01C31DF4.27726520-- From jared Mon May 19 10:54:03 2003 Received: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) id h4JEs3es002356 for cisco-voip@puck.nether.net; Mon, 19 May 2003 10:54:03 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 10:54:03 -0400 From: Jared Mauch To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Message-ID: <20030519145403.GJ27086@puck.nether.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: [cisco-voip] PA-VXC/B/A and SIP? X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 14:54:04 -0000 Does anyone know if the PA-VXC/B/A supports SIP? - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine. From belen.pugliese@tecoar.com.ar Tue May 27 07:34:40 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be Tecoar puck.NOSPAM (int-200-49-213-138.movi.com.ar [200.49.213.138]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4RBYcaC031337 for ; Tue, 27 May 2003 07:34:39 -0400 Received: from Admin [200.49.213.142] by tecoar.com.ar [10.0.0.2] with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v5.0.5.R) for ; Tue, 27 May 2003 08:34:21 -0300 Message-ID: <00b401c32443$dcdbd8b0$160101c9@Admin> From: =?Windows-1252?Q?Bel=E9n_Pugliese?= To: Subject: [cisco-voip] WTS: ****NEW CISCO AS5350's**** Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 08:33:58 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00B1_01C3242A.B76B6140" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-MDRemoteIP: 200.49.213.142 X-Return-Path: belen.pugliese@tecoar.com.ar X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 11:34:40 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00B1_01C3242A.B76B6140 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Shane Breen,=20 Hi, I am Belen from Argentina, I recently saw your message searching the = web, and I would like to know, where did you find the prices of the = Cisco AS5350, particularly the AS535-4E1-120-AC. Best Regards, Belen Pugliese. Argentina [cisco-voip] WTS: ****NEW CISCO AS5350's**** Shane Breen ShaneBreen at comcast.net=20 Fri Mar 21 22:33:58 EST 2003=20 a.. Previous message: [cisco-voip] VOIP QoS questions=20 b.. Next message: [cisco-voip] How do I change SIP firmware to MGCP = firmware on a 7960 phone=20 c.. Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]=20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- These Cisco gateways are brand new with 90 day factory warranty:0) AS535-2E1-60-AC $8,900 AS535-2T1-48-AC $8,800 AS535-4E1-120-AC $16,500 AS535-4T1-96-AC $15,500 AS535-8E1-216-AC $26,500 AS535-8T1-192-AC $25,500 Please let me know these are available for immediate delivery world = wide. Thanks You, Shane Breen 404-808-4022 shanebreen at comcast.net ------=_NextPart_000_00B1_01C3242A.B76B6140 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Shane Breen,

Hi, I am Belen from Argentina, I recently saw your = message=20 searching the web, and I would like to know, where did you=20 find the prices of the Cisco AS5350, particularly the = AS535-4E1-120-AC.
 
Best Regards,
Belen Pugliese.
Argentina

[cisco-voip] WTS: ****NEW CISCO AS5350's****

Shane=20 Breen ShaneBreen=20 at comcast.net
Fri Mar 21 22:33:58 EST 2003=20

  • Previous message: [cisco-voip]=20 VOIP QoS questions
  • Next message: [cisco-voip]=20 How do I change SIP firmware to MGCP firmware on a 7960 phone
  • Messages sorted by: [=20 date ] [=20 thread ] [=20 subject ] [=20 author ] 
These Cisco =
gateways are brand new with 90 day factory warranty:0)

AS535-2E1-60-AC  $8,900
AS535-2T1-48-AC  $8,800
AS535-4E1-120-AC $16,500
AS535-4T1-96-AC  $15,500
AS535-8E1-216-AC $26,500
AS535-8T1-192-AC $25,500

Please let me know these are available for immediate delivery world =
wide.

Thanks You,

Shane Breen
404-808-4022
shanebreen at comcast.net
------=_NextPart_000_00B1_01C3242A.B76B6140-- From joshua.ej.smith@usa.net Thu May 29 07:43:02 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be cmsrelay02.mx.net puck.NOSPAM (cmsrelay02.mx.net [165.212.11.111]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id h4TBh1lb002733 for ; Thu, 29 May 2003 07:43:01 -0400 Received: from uadvg137.cms.usa.net (165.212.11.137) by cmsoutbound.mx.net with SMTP; 29 May 2003 11:42:33 -0000 Received: from uwdvg017.cms.usa.net [165.212.8.17] by uadvg137.cms.usa.net (ASMTP/) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.06H) with ESMTP id 420HeCLQE0411M37; Thu, 29 May 2003 11:42:31 GMT Received: from 216.199.153.34 [216.199.153.34] by uwdvg017.cms.usa.net (USANET web-mailer CM.0402.5.5); Thu, 29 May 2003 11:42:28 -0000 Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 07:42:28 -0400 From: Joshua Sahala To: Jared Mauch , Andy Melton X-Mailer: USANET web-mailer (CM.0402.5.5) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <072HeCLQC3216S17.1054208548@uwdvg017.cms.usa.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by puck.nether.net id h4TBh1lb002733 cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [cisco-voip] Re: [Re: [nsp] Translation Rules for India] X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 11:43:02 -0000 andy, each city is 9n (as far as i can remember, but i haven't had to try and do the entire country on one gateway) - i would try matching on that and write your peers to creatively match, then you can chew up the digits with prefixes or translation rules. (karnataka would be dialed 0119195nn... i believe, so you would only need to strip the 01191) you could try something like this on your pots peers (i am making the assupmtion that your are terminating on the pstn) dial-peer voice 1 pots dest 011919[5-n].T prefix 9 port 0/0:d Jared Mauch wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 03:40:00PM -0700, Andy Melton wrote: > > Sorry if this is OT>>> > > > > Has anyone constructed a set of VoIP translation rules for India? The > > country has city codes of variable length, from 2 to 4 digits which must > > be stripped off and replaced with an alternate pattern depending on the > > dialed digits. > > > > For example, our GW will be in Karnataka. Any call to Karnataka should > > be place as a local call, i.e. 01191 should be replaced by 95 (Rule 0 > > ^01191 95). However, other cities should be placed as long distance > > calls, i.e. strip the 01191 and pass the city code plus destination > > number. > > > > So the problem is that Karnataka has hundreds of cities, far more than > > the 10 translation rule capability. Does anyone have a template which > > makes some sense of the Indian dialing plan? > > Is there some reason you can't run some external translation > server (asterisk, ser, etc..) that will make sense of the dialplans > independently of your ios based devices? > > I've found that it's worthwhile to rewrite things to the longest > possible string eg: 001 313 555 1212 whenever possible, then create the > dial-peers as necessary to strip the irrelevant stuff off. > > - jared > > -- > Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net > clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine. > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > "Walk with me through the Universe, And along the way see how all of us are Connected. Feast the eyes of your Soul, On the Love that abounds. In all places at once, seemingly endless, Like your own existence." - Stephen Hawking - From Scott.Voll@wesd.org Tue Jun 10 17:34:16 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be venus.wesd.org puck.NOSPAM (venus.wesd.org [198.237.190.3]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h5ALYFlb015278 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 17:34:15 -0400 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 14:33:14 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C32F97.E6345DA5" X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Does this list get used?? X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 Thread-Index: AcMvl+YwRKfbuIiuQx+D4o+MFzjJng== From: "Voll, Scott" To: Subject: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used?? X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 21:34:17 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C32F97.E6345DA5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have not seen any activity on this list in a week or so. Is there anyone else subscribed? =20 We are looking at moving to Cisco IP Telephony. We are also looking into installing it our selves. Has anyone done the same? =20 =20 Scott Voll Network Analyst, CCNA=20 Willamette ESD scott.voll@wesd.org =20 =20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C32F97.E6345DA5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I have not seen any activity on this list in a week = or so. Is there anyone else subscribed?

 

We are looking at moving to Cisco IP Telephony.  = We are also looking into installing it our selves.  Has anyone done the same? 

 

Scott = Voll

Network = Analyst, CCNA

Willamette ESD

=00 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C32F97.E6345DA5-- From jared Tue Jun 10 19:09:27 2003 Received: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) id h5AN9R34018627; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:09:27 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:09:27 -0400 From: Jared Mauch To: "Voll, Scott" Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used?? Message-ID: <20030610230927.GD10766@puck.nether.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 23:09:27 -0000 On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:33:14PM -0700, Voll, Scott wrote: > I have not seen any activity on this list in a week or so. Is there > anyone else subscribed? Yeah. > We are looking at moving to Cisco IP Telephony. We are also looking > into installing it our selves. Has anyone done the same? I'm doing this with Cisco hardware, (phones, routers w/ NM-2V) running SIP based images with Asterisk. - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine. From listuser@peternixon.net Wed Jun 11 03:43:16 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be phat.nether.net puck.NOSPAM (phat.nether.net [204.212.45.10]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h5B7hElb016687 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 03:43:15 -0400 Received: from someone claiming to be nix-notebook.ipterminator.com PhAT.NOSPAM ([213.194.96.172]) by phat.nether.net (8.12.8/8.11.2) with ESMTP id h5B7Sobv025468 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 07:28:59 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nix-notebook.ipterminator.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3532B4B505 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:24:44 +0300 (EEST) From: Peter Nixon To: Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used?? Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:24:43 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: In-Reply-To: X-Message-Flag: Don't you wish you used Linux? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200306111024.43309.listuser@peternixon.net> X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 07:43:26 -0000 On Wed June 11 2003 00:33, Voll, Scott wrote: > I have not seen any activity on this list in a week or so. Is there > anyone else subscribed? I also subscribed a week or so ago and have not seen any traffic. > We are looking at moving to Cisco IP Telephony. We are also looking > into installing it our selves. Has anyone done the same? I run a large Cisco based VoIP termination network across several contries. -- Peter Nixon http://www.peternixon.net/ PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc From joshua.ej.smith@usa.net Wed Jun 11 07:04:51 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be cmsrelay03.mx.net puck.NOSPAM (cmsrelay03.mx.net [165.212.11.112]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id h5BB4plb026151 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 07:04:51 -0400 Received: from cmsapps02.cms.usa.net (165.212.11.138) by cmsoutbound.mx.net with SMTP; 11 Jun 2003 11:03:52 -0000 Received: from uwdvg008.cms.usa.net [165.212.8.8] by cmsapps02.cms.usa.net (ASMTP/) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.06H) with ESMTP id 258HFkLDY0031M38; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 11:03:50 GMT Received: from 216.199.153.34 [216.199.153.34] by uwdvg008.cms.usa.net (USANET web-mailer CM.0402.5.5); Wed, 11 Jun 2003 11:03:49 -0000 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 07:03:49 -0400 From: Joshua Sahala To: "Voll, Scott" , Subject: Re: [[cisco-voip] Does this list get used??] X-Mailer: USANET web-mailer (CM.0402.5.5) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <820HFkLDx7968S08.1055329429@uwdvg008.cms.usa.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by puck.nether.net id h5BB4plb026151 X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 11:04:52 -0000 "Voll, Scott" wrote: > --------------------------------------------- > Attachment: > MIME Type: multipart/alternative > --------------------------------------------- tsk tsk ;) > I have not seen any activity on this list in a week or so. Is there > anyone else subscribed? > > yep > > We are looking at moving to Cisco IP Telephony. We are also looking > into installing it our selves. Has anyone done the same? > > depends on what you want to do (and how much you want||can spend). i am using primarily h.323 for a multinational carrier voip network - sip may work better (and will probably provide more bells & whistles) for your needs /joshua > > Scott Voll > > Network Analyst, CCNA > > Willamette ESD > > scott.voll@wesd.org > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------- > Attachment: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > MIME Type: text/plain > --------------------------------------------- "Walk with me through the Universe, And along the way see how all of us are Connected. Feast the eyes of your Soul, On the Love that abounds. In all places at once, seemingly endless, Like your own existence." - Stephen Hawking - From nham.kandala@keaneindia.com Wed Jun 11 13:07:10 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be mx2 puck.NOSPAM (mx2.signaltreesolutions.com [4.23.25.3]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id h5BH78lb019963 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 13:07:09 -0400 Received: from 208.193.6.17 by mx2 (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Wed, 11 Jun 2003 09:54:37 -0700 Received: by exla01.metamorgs.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:12:32 -0700 Message-ID: <0861C25BF9E3D511B5C8009027E32A0A03761A@exla01.metamorgs.com> From: Nham Kandala To: "'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net'" Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used?? Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:12:31 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------InterScan_NT_MIME_Boundary" X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:07:11 -0000 This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --------------InterScan_NT_MIME_Boundary Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C3303C.A4A7FEB0" ------_=_NextPart_001_01C3303C.A4A7FEB0 Content-Type: text/plain Hi, We are thinking to use VoIP gatewaying using Cisco equipment. We are in the initial process, Any help/suggestions about the approach is appreciated. We will be using the Nortel PBXs in Branches. We want to install VG200 , with NM-HDs as VoIP gateways from Corporate to Branches. In corporate we want to terminate ISDN PRIs in to the central VG200. In the Branches, we want to connect Branch VG200s to the PBXs. Any better approach recommendations, any suggestions? Thank You, _________________________________________ Nham Kandala, 949-450-4693 -----Original Message----- From: Peter Nixon [mailto:listuser@peternixon.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:25 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used?? On Wed June 11 2003 00:33, Voll, Scott wrote: > I have not seen any activity on this list in a week or so. Is there > anyone else subscribed? I also subscribed a week or so ago and have not seen any traffic. > We are looking at moving to Cisco IP Telephony. We are also looking > into installing it our selves. Has anyone done the same? I run a large Cisco based VoIP termination network across several contries. -- Peter Nixon http://www.peternixon.net/ PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ------_=_NextPart_001_01C3303C.A4A7FEB0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used??

Hi,

We are thinking to use VoIP gatewaying using Cisco = equipment.

We are in the initial process, Any help/suggestions = about the approach is appreciated.

We will be using the Nortel PBXs in Branches.
We want to install VG200 , with NM-HDs as VoIP = gateways from Corporate to Branches.

In corporate we want to terminate ISDN PRIs in to the = central VG200.

In the Branches, we want to connect Branch VG200s to = the PBXs.

Any better approach recommendations, any = suggestions?


Thank You,
_________________________________________
Nham Kandala, 949-450-4693


-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nixon [mailto:listuser@peternixon.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:25 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Does this list get = used??

On Wed June 11 2003 00:33, Voll, Scott wrote:
> I have not seen any activity on this list in a = week or so. Is there
> anyone else subscribed?

I also subscribed a week or so ago and have not seen = any traffic.

> We are looking at moving to Cisco IP = Telephony.  We are also looking
> into installing it our selves.  Has anyone = done the same?

I run a large Cisco based VoIP termination network = across several contries.

--

Peter Nixon
http://www.peternixon.net/
PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip=

------_=_NextPart_001_01C3303C.A4A7FEB0-- --------------InterScan_NT_MIME_Boundary-- From wsisk@cisco.com Wed Jun 11 13:22:31 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be rooster.cisco.com puck.NOSPAM (bantam.cisco.com [64.102.19.199]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h5BHMUlb021442 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 13:22:30 -0400 Received: from wsiskpc (dhcp-64-102-50-160.cisco.com [64.102.50.160]) by rooster.cisco.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id h5BHLTH05858; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 13:21:29 -0400 (EDT) From: "Wes Sisk" To: "Nham Kandala" , Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used?? Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 13:21:29 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004C_01C3301C.5E2868F0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <0861C25BF9E3D511B5C8009027E32A0A03761A@exla01.metamorgs.com> X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:22:35 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_004C_01C3301C.5E2868F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit RE: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used??vg200's are End-Of-Sales for Cisco so you might be hard pressed to find them. /Wes -----Original Message----- From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Nham Kandala Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:13 PM To: 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net' Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used?? Hi, We are thinking to use VoIP gatewaying using Cisco equipment. We are in the initial process, Any help/suggestions about the approach is appreciated. We will be using the Nortel PBXs in Branches. We want to install VG200 , with NM-HDs as VoIP gateways from Corporate to Branches. In corporate we want to terminate ISDN PRIs in to the central VG200. In the Branches, we want to connect Branch VG200s to the PBXs. Any better approach recommendations, any suggestions? Thank You, _________________________________________ Nham Kandala, 949-450-4693 -----Original Message----- From: Peter Nixon [mailto:listuser@peternixon.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:25 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used?? On Wed June 11 2003 00:33, Voll, Scott wrote: > I have not seen any activity on this list in a week or so. Is there > anyone else subscribed? I also subscribed a week or so ago and have not seen any traffic. > We are looking at moving to Cisco IP Telephony. We are also looking > into installing it our selves. Has anyone done the same? I run a large Cisco based VoIP termination network across several contries. -- Peter Nixon http://www.peternixon.net/ PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ------=_NextPart_000_004C_01C3301C.5E2868F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used??
vg200's are End-Of-Sales for Cisco so you might = be hard=20 pressed to find them. /Wes
-----Original Message-----
From:=20 cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net=20 [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Nham=20 Kandala
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:13 PM
To: = 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net'
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Does = this=20 list get used??

Hi,

We are thinking to use VoIP gatewaying using Cisco=20 equipment.

We are in the initial process, Any help/suggestions = about the=20 approach is appreciated.

We will be using the Nortel PBXs in Branches. =
We want to install VG200 , with NM-HDs as VoIP gateways from = Corporate=20 to Branches.

In corporate we want to terminate ISDN PRIs in to = the central=20 VG200.

In the Branches, we want to connect Branch VG200s to = the=20 PBXs.

Any better approach recommendations, any = suggestions?=20


Thank You,
_________________________________________
Nham=20 Kandala, 949-450-4693


-----Original Message-----
From: Peter=20 Nixon [mailto:listuser@peternixon.net]=20
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:25 = AM=20
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used?? =

On Wed June 11 2003 00:33, Voll, Scott wrote: =
> I have not seen any activity on this list in a week or = so. Is=20 there
> anyone else subscribed? =

I also subscribed a week or so ago and have not seen = any=20 traffic.

> We are looking at moving to Cisco IP = Telephony.  We=20 are also looking
> into installing it our = selves.  Has anyone done the same?

I run a large Cisco based VoIP termination network = across=20 several contries.

--

Peter Nixon
http://www.peternixon.net/= =20
PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/p= ublic.asc=20

_______________________________________________=20
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
http://puck.n= ether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip=20

------=_NextPart_000_004C_01C3301C.5E2868F0-- From nham.kandala@keaneindia.com Wed Jun 11 13:32:48 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be mx2 puck.NOSPAM (mx2.signaltreesolutions.com [4.23.25.3]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id h5BHWklb022029 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 13:32:47 -0400 Received: from 208.193.6.17 by mx2 (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:19:56 -0700 Received: by exla01.metamorgs.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:37:50 -0700 Message-ID: <0861C25BF9E3D511B5C8009027E32A0A03761D@exla01.metamorgs.com> From: Nham Kandala To: "'Wes Sisk'" , cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used?? Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:37:49 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------InterScan_NT_MIME_Boundary" X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:32:50 -0000 This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --------------InterScan_NT_MIME_Boundary Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C33040.2D6611D0" ------_=_NextPart_001_01C33040.2D6611D0 Content-Type: text/plain Wow. Thanks for the advise. Which device can hold multiple Multiflex T1 cards ? i.e.,, more than 2 . We looked at 8 port T1 card for 6509 and I think that won't really not suitable for connecting multiple ISDN PRIs directly to the VoIP Gateway. What is Q-SIG ? Thank You, _________________________________________ Nham Kandala, Corp IT, Keane Inc. 949-450-4693 -----Original Message----- From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:21 AM To: Nham Kandala; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used?? vg200's are End-Of-Sales for Cisco so you might be hard pressed to find them. /Wes -----Original Message----- From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Nham Kandala Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:13 PM To: 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net' Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used?? Hi, We are thinking to use VoIP gatewaying using Cisco equipment. We are in the initial process, Any help/suggestions about the approach is appreciated. We will be using the Nortel PBXs in Branches. We want to install VG200 , with NM-HDs as VoIP gateways from Corporate to Branches. In corporate we want to terminate ISDN PRIs in to the central VG200. In the Branches, we want to connect Branch VG200s to the PBXs. Any better approach recommendations, any suggestions? Thank You, _________________________________________ Nham Kandala, 949-450-4693 -----Original Message----- From: Peter Nixon [mailto:listuser@peternixon.net ] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:25 AM To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used?? On Wed June 11 2003 00:33, Voll, Scott wrote: > I have not seen any activity on this list in a week or so. Is there > anyone else subscribed? I also subscribed a week or so ago and have not seen any traffic. > We are looking at moving to Cisco IP Telephony. We are also looking > into installing it our selves. Has anyone done the same? I run a large Cisco based VoIP termination network across several contries. -- Peter Nixon http://www.peternixon.net/ PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip ------_=_NextPart_001_01C33040.2D6611D0 Content-Type: text/html RE: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used??

Wow.

Thanks for the advise.

 

Which device can hold multiple Multiflex T1 cards ? i.e.,, more than 2 .

We looked at 8 port T1 card for 6509 and I think that won't really not suitable for connecting multiple ISDN PRIs directly to the VoIP Gateway.

 

What is Q-SIG ?

 

 

Thank You,

_________________________________________

Nham Kandala, Corp IT, Keane Inc. 949-450-4693

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Wes Sisk [mailto:wsisk@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:21 AM
To: Nham Kandala; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used??

 

vg200's are End-Of-Sales for Cisco so you might be hard pressed to find them. /Wes

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Nham Kandala
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:13 PM
To: 'cisco-voip@puck.nether.net'
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used??

Hi,

We are thinking to use VoIP gatewaying using Cisco equipment.

We are in the initial process, Any help/suggestions about the approach is appreciated.

We will be using the Nortel PBXs in Branches.
We want to install VG200 , with NM-HDs as VoIP gateways from Corporate to Branches.

In corporate we want to terminate ISDN PRIs in to the central VG200.

In the Branches, we want to connect Branch VG200s to the PBXs.

Any better approach recommendations, any suggestions?

 

Thank You,
_________________________________________
Nham Kandala, 949-450-4693

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Nixon [mailto:listuser@peternixon.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:25 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used??

On Wed June 11 2003 00:33, Voll, Scott wrote:
> I have not seen any activity on this list in a week or so. Is there
> anyone else subscribed?

I also subscribed a week or so ago and have not seen any traffic.

> We are looking at moving to Cisco IP Telephony.  We are also looking
> into installing it our selves.  Has anyone done the same?

I run a large Cisco based VoIP termination network across several contries.

--

Peter Nixon
http://www.peternixon.net/
PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

------_=_NextPart_001_01C33040.2D6611D0-- --------------InterScan_NT_MIME_Boundary-- From nham.kandala@keaneindia.com Wed Jun 11 14:11:21 2003 Received: from someone claiming to be mx2 puck.NOSPAM (mx2.signaltreesolutions.com [4.23.25.3]) by puck.nether.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with SMTP id h5BIBKlb024493 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 14:11:20 -0400 Received: from 208.193.6.17 by mx2 (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:58:22 -0700 Received: by exla01.metamorgs.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 11:16:17 -0700 Message-ID: <0861C25BF9E3D511B5C8009027E32A0A037620@exla01.metamorgs.com> From: Nham Kandala To: "'Wes Sisk'" , cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used?? Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 11:16:16 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------InterScan_NT_MIME_Boundary" X-BeenThere: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Cisco VoIP list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:11:21 -0000 This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --------------InterScan_NT_MIME_Boundary Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C33045.8CBF9BB0" ------_=_NextPart_001_01C33045.8CBF9BB0 Content-Type: text/plain Another choice is a 3660 with Multiflex T1 cards I guess. Thank You, _________________________________________ Nham Kandala, 949-450-4693 -----Original Message----- From: Nham Kandala Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:38 AM To: 'Wes Sisk'; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Does this list get used?? Wow. Thanks for the advise. Which device can hold multiple Multiflex T1 cards ? i.e.,, more than 2 . We looked at 8 port T1 card for 6509 and I think that won't really not suit