From Scott.Voll at wesd.org  Thu Jul  3 09:17:19 2003
From: Scott.Voll at wesd.org (Voll, Scott)
Date: Thu Jul  3 11:19:34 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] Tadiran <-> Cisco
Message-ID: <A85EF8C2C10DA6499807D44B7FDFEB4F17DD65@venus.wesd.org>

Has anyone successfully integrated Cisco VoIP with a Tadiran Coral
III???  What can you tell me about things I need to know or think about?
Any information would be great.

Thanks in advance.

Scott Voll
Network Analyst, CCNA 
Willamette ESD
Phone: (503) 385-4571
scott.voll@wesd.org


From dalai at mobicom.mn  Fri Jul  4 12:58:55 2003
From: dalai at mobicom.mn (Oyundalai.N)
Date: Thu Jul  3 22:59:12 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] VoIP documentation source
Message-ID: <02ea01c341e0$96db73b0$2500a8c0@dalai>

Hello all
I see the list is not so active, but my question is folloing.

Please help to find a good starting document about VoIP?
Thank you.

Oyundalai.N
Internet department
Mobicom Company
Mobile: +976-99111034
Tel(office): +976-11-326903
Fax(office) +976-11-326827

From joe at go-ac.com  Mon Jul  7 08:36:49 2003
From: joe at go-ac.com (Joe Kearns)
Date: Mon Jul  7 10:38:58 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] For Sale - AS5400 Voice Systems
Message-ID: <A9D437DFD307284FBEAAFF370461A8DA73CE3B@ac-server01.AmericanCommunicationsInc.com>

Please contact me with any questions/interest

 

AS54-8T1-192-DC/AC


chassis, 2x108NP, 1x8CT1                     192 voice ports
$28,000 each

 

AS54-8E1-240-DC/AC


chassis, 2x108NP, 1x8CE1                    240 voice ports
$28,000 each

 

AS54-16T1-384-DC/AC


chassis, 3x108NP, 1x60NP, 2x8T1         384 voice ports
$35,000 each

 

AS54-16E1-480-DC/AC


chassis, 5x108NP, 2x8E1                      480 voice ports
$40,000 each

 

AS54-CT3-384-DC/AC


chassis, 4x108NP, 1xCT3                      384 voice ports
$33,000 each

 

AS54-CT3-480-DC/AC


chassis, 5xNP108, 1xCT3                      480 voice ports
$35,000 each

 

AS54-CT3-648-DC/AC


chassis, 6xNP108, 1xCT3                      648 voice ports
$46,000 each

 

AS54-CT3-648-DC/AC


 chassis, 6xNP108, 1xCT3                     648 DATA ports
$46,000 each

 

Systems are in great condition and include a 30 day warranty. 

 

Thank you,

 

Joe Kearns
American Communications
Phone  (805) 968-3800 x201
Fax      (805) 968-3802
joe@go-ac.com <mailto:joe@go-ac.com> 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20030707/87672a72/attachment.htm
From cearle at cbltech.ca  Wed Jul  9 15:35:57 2003
From: cearle at cbltech.ca (Chris Earle (CBL))
Date: Wed Jul  9 14:27:34 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] ATA-186: no answer
Message-ID: <013c01c34648$eff757e0$6b01a8c0@chris>

Hey everyone,

just a quick question someone might be able to help me out with.
I've got an ATA-186 (v2.15) running with the GNUGK, and everything registers
fine, and I can make calls to other IPs/aliases with the ATA, but for some
reason, I can't receive calls in?
On the call request in the gatekeeper it drops the call right away, stating
'unknown' as the reason for disengaging.

Anyone know what's going on here?

I've looked all over and thought I'd finally post something here.

thanks for any help

-- 
C  h  r  i  s    E  a  r  l  e
System Solutions Specialist


From cearle at cbltech.ca  Wed Jul  9 15:37:38 2003
From: cearle at cbltech.ca (Chris Earle (CBL))
Date: Wed Jul  9 14:29:17 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] Re: ATA-186: no answer
Message-ID: <015b01c34649$2c8d4ac0$6b01a8c0@chris>

more info for the debuggers out there, since I just got prserv working:

"GK->0: GCF:GK@0xc0a8016b-1719
OpenH323GK
GK<-0: RRQ
GK->0: RCF:TTL 300
0:30;0,0,0,0,
PDU overflow : 3176 0x1
Wed Jul 09 13:01:05 2003 Hello from ata0008a3962981@192.168.1.23 (1174-0)
Build 020927a: v2.15 ata18x
RBytes Chksum: 0x0  0x0
[0]MPT mode 0
[2]MPT mode 0
[1]MPT mode 0
[3]MPT mode 0
GK zone<.>192.168.1.107: 2200
0x1488a8 delayed RRQ: 27 ticks: 300
GK<-0: GRQ"


the line PDU overflow mean anything to anyone?

!


-- 
C  h  r  i  s    E  a  r  l  e
System Solutions Specialist

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Earle (CBL)" <cearle@cbltech.ca>
To: <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:35 PM
Subject: ATA-186: no answer


> Hey everyone,
>
> just a quick question someone might be able to help me out with.
> I've got an ATA-186 (v2.15) running with the GNUGK, and everything
registers
> fine, and I can make calls to other IPs/aliases with the ATA, but for some
> reason, I can't receive calls in?
> On the call request in the gatekeeper it drops the call right away,
stating
> 'unknown' as the reason for disengaging.
>
> Anyone know what's going on here?
>
> I've looked all over and thought I'd finally post something here.
>
> thanks for any help
>
> -- 
> C  h  r  i  s    E  a  r  l  e
> System Solutions Specialist
>
>

From jkeane at bis-internet.co.uk  Mon Jul 14 14:56:35 2003
From: jkeane at bis-internet.co.uk (John Keane)
Date: Mon Jul 14 09:00:59 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] 
Message-ID: <001a01c34a07$5b2bf5e0$dd02a8c0@jkdell>

Dear list 
 
Is there a way to register ranges of numbers from a cisco gateway with a
gatekeeper. I have looked on CCO and it seems only full numbers can be
registered.
 
Any ideas welcome.
 
John Keane 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.493 / Virus Database: 292 - Release Date: 25/06/2003
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20030714/b65949ee/attachment.htm
From jeff at expertcity.com  Mon Jul 14 11:24:59 2003
From: jeff at expertcity.com (Jeff Behl)
Date: Mon Jul 14 13:27:19 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] 7200 VXB-2TE1 h323 gateway...
Message-ID: <3F12E76B.5040901@expertcity.com>

i have a 7200 with the above which is currently registered to the cm. 
what i'd like to do is put each pri port into its own route group then 
create a route list of the two groups.  is this possible in this 
situation?  right now putting the gateway by itself into a route group 
isn't possible as it doesn't show up as a possible addtion when creating 
one, though I've heard that it won't show up if the gateway is already 
defined for use in a dial pattern...

thanks

From wsisk at cisco.com  Mon Jul 14 15:29:50 2003
From: wsisk at cisco.com (Wes Sisk)
Date: Mon Jul 14 14:32:19 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] 7200 VXB-2TE1 h323 gateway...
In-Reply-To: <3F12E76B.5040901@expertcity.com>
Message-ID: <ELEMLGDGDBLINAJEIOCLAEKHMGAA.wsisk@cisco.com>

Sounds like you have your route pattern directly at the gateway
so the gateway is not eligible to be in a routegroup.
To get around it consider something like this:

change your route patter to point at a route list
(this frees the gateway to be added to a route group)

Then configure your gateway to be in the route groups you desire.

/Wes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Jeff Behl
> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:25 PM
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] 7200 VXB-2TE1 h323 gateway...
> 
> 
> i have a 7200 with the above which is currently registered to the cm. 
> what i'd like to do is put each pri port into its own route group then 
> create a route list of the two groups.  is this possible in this 
> situation?  right now putting the gateway by itself into a route group 
> isn't possible as it doesn't show up as a possible addtion when creating 
> one, though I've heard that it won't show up if the gateway is already 
> defined for use in a dial pattern...
> 
> thanks
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
From jeff at expertcity.com  Mon Jul 14 14:40:24 2003
From: jeff at expertcity.com (Jeff Behl)
Date: Mon Jul 14 16:42:43 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] 7200 VXB-2TE1 h323 gateway...
In-Reply-To: <ELEMLGDGDBLINAJEIOCLAEKHMGAA.wsisk@cisco.com>
References: <ELEMLGDGDBLINAJEIOCLAEKHMGAA.wsisk@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <3F131538.4050808@expertcity.com>

thanks.  one q remaining:  once I do this will i have the ability to 
add individual ports on the adaptor (there are two) to different route 
groups?


thanks again.
jeff

Wes Sisk wrote:

> Sounds like you have your route pattern directly at the gateway
> so the gateway is not eligible to be in a routegroup.
> To get around it consider something like this:
> 
> change your route patter to point at a route list
> (this frees the gateway to be added to a route group)
> 
> Then configure your gateway to be in the route groups you desire.
> 
> /Wes
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
>>[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Jeff Behl
>>Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:25 PM
>>To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>>Subject: [cisco-voip] 7200 VXB-2TE1 h323 gateway...
>>
>>
>>i have a 7200 with the above which is currently registered to the cm. 
>>what i'd like to do is put each pri port into its own route group then 
>>create a route list of the two groups.  is this possible in this 
>>situation?  right now putting the gateway by itself into a route group 
>>isn't possible as it doesn't show up as a possible addtion when creating 
>>one, though I've heard that it won't show up if the gateway is already 
>>defined for use in a dial pattern...
>>
>>thanks
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>cisco-voip mailing list
>>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



From wsisk at cisco.com  Mon Jul 14 17:45:56 2003
From: wsisk at cisco.com (Wes Sisk)
Date: Mon Jul 14 16:48:23 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] 7200 VXB-2TE1 h323 gateway...
In-Reply-To: <3F131538.4050808@expertcity.com>
Message-ID: <ELEMLGDGDBLINAJEIOCLAEKMMGAA.wsisk@cisco.com>

Nope.

To be able to route specific calls to different ports you will
either need to get a bit creative with your dialplan.

Currently you probably have dial-peers with something like 9.T
going out both ports.  Change this so 7.T goes out one port and 9.T goes
out the other port.  Then use the Route Pattern/Route List/Route Group
in /CCMAdmin to strip/prepend the appropriate trunk access code.

/Wes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Behl [mailto:jeff@expertcity.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 4:40 PM
> To: Wes Sisk
> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 7200 VXB-2TE1 h323 gateway...
> 
> 
> thanks.  one q remaining:  once I do this will i have the ability to 
> add individual ports on the adaptor (there are two) to different route 
> groups?
> 
> 
> thanks again.
> jeff
> 
> Wes Sisk wrote:
> 
> > Sounds like you have your route pattern directly at the gateway
> > so the gateway is not eligible to be in a routegroup.
> > To get around it consider something like this:
> > 
> > change your route patter to point at a route list
> > (this frees the gateway to be added to a route group)
> > 
> > Then configure your gateway to be in the route groups you desire.
> > 
> > /Wes
> > 
> > 
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> >>[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Jeff Behl
> >>Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:25 PM
> >>To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> >>Subject: [cisco-voip] 7200 VXB-2TE1 h323 gateway...
> >>
> >>
> >>i have a 7200 with the above which is currently registered to the cm. 
> >>what i'd like to do is put each pri port into its own route group then 
> >>create a route list of the two groups.  is this possible in this 
> >>situation?  right now putting the gateway by itself into a route group 
> >>isn't possible as it doesn't show up as a possible addtion when 
> creating 
> >>one, though I've heard that it won't show up if the gateway is already 
> >>defined for use in a dial pattern...
> >>
> >>thanks
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>cisco-voip mailing list
> >>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> >>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 
> 
From wsisk at cisco.com  Mon Jul 14 17:59:48 2003
From: wsisk at cisco.com (Wes Sisk)
Date: Mon Jul 14 17:02:17 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] 7200 VXB-2TE1 h323 gateway...
In-Reply-To: <ELEMLGDGDBLINAJEIOCLAEKMMGAA.wsisk@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <ELEMLGDGDBLINAJEIOCLIEKNMGAA.wsisk@cisco.com>

Oh, and then for the rest of the setup,
add the gateway to 2 different route groups with different
stip/prefix digits.  Then point the Pattern->List to the appropriate group.

/wes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Wes Sisk
> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 4:46 PM
> To: Jeff Behl
> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] 7200 VXB-2TE1 h323 gateway...
>
>
> Nope.
>
> To be able to route specific calls to different ports you will
> either need to get a bit creative with your dialplan.
>
> Currently you probably have dial-peers with something like 9.T
> going out both ports.  Change this so 7.T goes out one port and 9.T goes
> out the other port.  Then use the Route Pattern/Route List/Route Group
> in /CCMAdmin to strip/prepend the appropriate trunk access code.
>
> /Wes
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeff Behl [mailto:jeff@expertcity.com]
> > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 4:40 PM
> > To: Wes Sisk
> > Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 7200 VXB-2TE1 h323 gateway...
> >
> >
> > thanks.  one q remaining:  once I do this will i have the ability to
> > add individual ports on the adaptor (there are two) to different route
> > groups?
> >
> >
> > thanks again.
> > jeff
> >
> > Wes Sisk wrote:
> >
> > > Sounds like you have your route pattern directly at the gateway
> > > so the gateway is not eligible to be in a routegroup.
> > > To get around it consider something like this:
> > >
> > > change your route patter to point at a route list
> > > (this frees the gateway to be added to a route group)
> > >
> > > Then configure your gateway to be in the route groups you desire.
> > >
> > > /Wes
> > >
> > >
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> > >>[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Jeff Behl
> > >>Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:25 PM
> > >>To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> > >>Subject: [cisco-voip] 7200 VXB-2TE1 h323 gateway...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>i have a 7200 with the above which is currently registered to the cm.
> > >>what i'd like to do is put each pri port into its own route
> group then
> > >>create a route list of the two groups.  is this possible in this
> > >>situation?  right now putting the gateway by itself into a
> route group
> > >>isn't possible as it doesn't show up as a possible addtion when
> > creating
> > >>one, though I've heard that it won't show up if the gateway
> is already
> > >>defined for use in a dial pattern...
> > >>
> > >>thanks
> > >>
> > >>_______________________________________________
> > >>cisco-voip mailing list
> > >>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> > >>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

From anomet at tronet.com  Wed Jul 16 10:12:42 2003
From: anomet at tronet.com (=?iso-8859-2?Q?=22N=E9meth=2C_Pavol=22?=)
Date: Wed Jul 16 03:15:28 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] Re: John Keane
Message-ID: <A44DA7EDD8262343B02C64AF7E063A0744E130@kenya.ba.tronet.sk>

Hi there,

you are right, you cannot register a range, only full numbers. But you can try to use "h323-gateway voip tech-prefix" to register a tech-prefix and than every call to a number starting with the same numbers as the tech-prefix can be routed to the gateway.

Cheers,

anomet

From jeff at expertcity.com  Wed Jul 16 16:39:12 2003
From: jeff at expertcity.com (Jeff Behl)
Date: Wed Jul 16 18:41:38 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] 7200 VXB-2TE1 h323 gateway...
In-Reply-To: <ELEMLGDGDBLINAJEIOCLAEKMMGAA.wsisk@cisco.com>
References: <ELEMLGDGDBLINAJEIOCLAEKMMGAA.wsisk@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <3F15D410.1080800@expertcity.com>

thanks.  looks like tricky dialplan or wait unil MGCP comes out for the 
7200s, which rumor has it is slated for Dec...

jeff

Wes Sisk wrote:

> Nope.
> 
> To be able to route specific calls to different ports you will
> either need to get a bit creative with your dialplan.
> 
> Currently you probably have dial-peers with something like 9.T
> going out both ports.  Change this so 7.T goes out one port and 9.T goes
> out the other port.  Then use the Route Pattern/Route List/Route Group
> in /CCMAdmin to strip/prepend the appropriate trunk access code.
> 
> /Wes
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jeff Behl [mailto:jeff@expertcity.com]
>>Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 4:40 PM
>>To: Wes Sisk
>>Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 7200 VXB-2TE1 h323 gateway...
>>
>>
>>thanks.  one q remaining:  once I do this will i have the ability to 
>>add individual ports on the adaptor (there are two) to different route 
>>groups?
>>
>>
>>thanks again.
>>jeff
>>
>>Wes Sisk wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Sounds like you have your route pattern directly at the gateway
>>>so the gateway is not eligible to be in a routegroup.
>>>To get around it consider something like this:
>>>
>>>change your route patter to point at a route list
>>>(this frees the gateway to be added to a route group)
>>>
>>>Then configure your gateway to be in the route groups you desire.
>>>
>>>/Wes
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
>>>>[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Jeff Behl
>>>>Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 1:25 PM
>>>>To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>>>>Subject: [cisco-voip] 7200 VXB-2TE1 h323 gateway...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>i have a 7200 with the above which is currently registered to the cm. 
>>>>what i'd like to do is put each pri port into its own route group then 
>>>>create a route list of the two groups.  is this possible in this 
>>>>situation?  right now putting the gateway by itself into a route group 
>>>>isn't possible as it doesn't show up as a possible addtion when 
>>
>>creating 
>>
>>>>one, though I've heard that it won't show up if the gateway is already 
>>>>defined for use in a dial pattern...
>>>>
>>>>thanks
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>cisco-voip mailing list
>>>>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>>>>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>


From listuser at peternixon.net  Fri Jul 18 16:29:45 2003
From: listuser at peternixon.net (Peter Nixon)
Date: Fri Jul 18 08:32:21 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] 5300 and 5350 SNMP mibs
Message-ID: <200307181529.45342.listuser@peternixon.net>

Hi List

Can someone point me in the right direction to get the SNMP MIB information 
for Cisco 5300 and 5350 gateways. I want to be able to see Number of active 
calls voice ports and also PRI status in OpenNMS.

TIA

-- 

Peter Nixon
http://www.peternixon.net/
PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc

From Ian.MacKinnon at thus.net  Fri Jul 18 14:35:45 2003
From: Ian.MacKinnon at thus.net (MacKinnon, Ian)
Date: Fri Jul 18 08:39:06 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] 5300 and 5350 SNMP mibs
Message-ID: <658BCF999CDBD211AAE100805FD71D700F3416C3@bsqtelntd04.scottishtelecom.com>

There is a good doc, including oids at 
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/univgate/ps501/products_implementation_design_guide_chapter09186a00800eaafd.html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Nixon [mailto:listuser@peternixon.net]
> Sent: Friday 18 July 2003 13:30
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] 5300 and 5350 SNMP mibs
> 
> 
> Hi List
> 
> Can someone point me in the right direction to get the SNMP 
> MIB information 
> for Cisco 5300 and 5350 gateways. I want to be able to see 
> Number of active 
> calls voice ports and also PRI status in OpenNMS.
> 
> TIA
> 
> -- 
> 
> Peter Nixon
> http://www.peternixon.net/
> PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 
From Scott.Voll at wesd.org  Fri Jul 18 16:40:48 2003
From: Scott.Voll at wesd.org (Voll, Scott)
Date: Fri Jul 18 18:43:51 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] signaling for PRI -- NewBee
Message-ID: <A85EF8C2C10DA6499807D44B7FDFEB4F17DD72@venus.wesd.org>

Newbee question-

What signaling do I want on my PRI?    DTMF / Pulse / Wink / Ground /
Immediate / B8ZS ??  These are my choices.  

We are just starting the Cvoice and CIPT class and have not yet got to
this but I need to get the PRI ordered.  

Thanks in advance.

Scott Voll
Network Analyst, CCNA 
Willamette ESD
Phone: (503) 385-4571
scott.voll@wesd.org

 

 



From wsisk at cisco.com  Fri Jul 18 22:12:05 2003
From: wsisk at cisco.com (Wes Sisk)
Date: Fri Jul 18 21:15:02 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] signaling for PRI -- NewBee
In-Reply-To: <A85EF8C2C10DA6499807D44B7FDFEB4F17DD72@venus.wesd.org>
Message-ID: <ELEMLGDGDBLINAJEIOCLMEDNMHAA.wsisk@cisco.com>

Scott,

Welcome to telecom :-)

I suggest spending several hours with a good good book like
Newton's Telecom Dictionary.

Your PRI uses a d-channel to do out of band signalling, but there
are several things "below" that if you think of this as a layered approach:

1. linecode: b8zs or ami
2. framing: esf or sf   (usually b8zs goes with esf and ami goes with sf)
3. then select your "isdn switch type" this is usually based on
what type of switch your carrier (or enterprise) is using
examples: primary-5ess primary-dms100 primary-ni

A PRI (Priarmay Rate Interface) uses out of band signaling via the
data channel (d-channel) to send calling/called party numbers. The voice
is the carried over the remaining bearer channels (b-channels) which
could be 1 or up to 23 on a single T1.  This is distinctly different from a
"voice t1" or "clear channel t1" or "robbed bit t1" or "t1-CAS"
CAS=Channel Associated Signaling.

For a Voice T1 you you have choices of Ground/Loop or E&M
Wink/Delay/Immediate.
These determine what type of signaling is used to initiate the call.
On a Voice T1 you would still have (by "layer")
1. linecode: b8zs or ami
2. framing: esf or sf   (usually b8zs goes with esf and ami goes with sf)
3. configure the number of ds0's and the signal type - Wink/Ground/Immediate
or Ground/Loop.

Avoid Ground/Loop if at all possible, chooose one of the 3 E&M types.

DTMF/Pulse are digit relay types.
DTMF = dual tone multi frequency is like your push button phone at home now.
pulse is like your phone when you were growing up (? age dependant)
with the dial that you spun around and around.

Use the keywords above and google or www.cisco.com to fill in the
gaps.

/Wes
-----------------------   Cisco Systems    -------------------------
Wes Sisk                    .        .     CSE Team Lead
Email: wsisk@cisco.com     .|.      .|.    Enterprise Voice TAC
Phone/Fax: 919-392-4515 .:|||||:..:|||||:. Research Triangle Park,NC

Case Update: http://www.cisco.com/kobayashi/support/tac/contact.shtml
   AVVID Sample Configs: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/788/
          Top Issues: http://www.cisco.com/tac/topissues



> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 6:41 PM
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] signaling for PRI -- NewBee
>
>
> Newbee question-
>
> What signaling do I want on my PRI?    DTMF / Pulse / Wink / Ground /
> Immediate / B8ZS ??  These are my choices.
>
> We are just starting the Cvoice and CIPT class and have not yet got to
> this but I need to get the PRI ordered.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Scott Voll
> Network Analyst, CCNA
> Willamette ESD
> Phone: (503) 385-4571
> scott.voll@wesd.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

From bdeaver at cisco.com  Fri Jul 18 23:25:50 2003
From: bdeaver at cisco.com (Bryan Deaver)
Date: Sat Jul 19 01:28:29 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] Re: John Keane
In-Reply-To: <A44DA7EDD8262343B02C64AF7E063A0744E130@kenya.ba.tronet.sk>
Message-ID: <DDEKLMJELHLLLHDJKPLEEEFEJDAA.bdeaver@cisco.com>

Check the below url.  In 12.2(15)T, a h323v4 feature was introduced which
seems to allow range destination patterns to be registered with a GK;
assuming the GK supports this functionality as well.

I think this will do what you want.  I will say though I have not yet played
with this functionality and just going by the release-notes.

Bryan


http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122
t/122t15/ftgwzpre.htm



-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of N?meth, Pavol
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 12:13 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Re: John Keane


Hi there,

you are right, you cannot register a range, only full numbers. But you can
try to use "h323-gateway voip tech-prefix" to register a tech-prefix and
than every call to a number starting with the same numbers as the
tech-prefix can be routed to the gateway.

Cheers,

anomet

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

From hweiss at platformexperts.com  Tue Jul 22 12:10:56 2003
From: hweiss at platformexperts.com (Chana Weiss)
Date: Tue Jul 22 11:15:11 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] as5350 fax problem
Message-ID: <DA67D9BBF53D9C448713DF4ADF1FD6B0E352@apmail.atarpx.callingcard.com>

Im experiencing fax problem on my cisco as5350. im using fax protocol t38. calls seem to be failing and disconnecting with normal call clearing.. Any help would be GREATLY appreciated. 

Chana Weiss
Network Support
Platform Experts 
Phone: (877) 445-6083


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20030722/c2b11fd5/attachment.htm
From p.plantinga at ee.wits.ac.za  Wed Jul 23 12:59:29 2003
From: p.plantinga at ee.wits.ac.za (Paul Plantinga)
Date: Tue Jul 29 10:58:49 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] Does PQ/CBWFQ work on 3640 Ethernet IF
Message-ID: <00c601c35101$1b755f80$c6758d92@liki>

Hello,

I'm fairly new to this but am running IOS 12.1(5)T on a cisco3640 and am trying to implement some/any priority queueing of my voice on a 10Mg Ethernet IF. It seems that you can configure anything.. but that doesn't mean it will run, so from the release notes it appears I cannot do CBWFQ or PQ on this interface, however the Cisco feature navigator says I can. I tried to test them both and it seems that they are matching correctly and being queued correctly but changing the voice class queue limit seems to have no effect on the delay of my udp packets (i.e. they are being queued behind the tcp no matter?). So are the config commands being ignored? (but my packet losses indicate some effect in changing queue limit).
Ultimately, what form of PQ can I run for voice in my setup?

Regards
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20030723/2d23a966/attachment.htm
From bdeaver at cisco.com  Tue Jul 29 18:14:51 2003
From: bdeaver at cisco.com (Bryan Deaver)
Date: Tue Jul 29 20:18:04 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] Does PQ/CBWFQ work on 3640 Ethernet IF
In-Reply-To: <00c601c35101$1b755f80$c6758d92@liki>
Message-ID: <DDEKLMJELHLLLHDJKPLEIEFCJFAA.bdeaver@cisco.com>

Yes, llq should be supported on the ethernet interface but have not really
seen a working need for it on a lan interface.  Are you experiencing voice
quality problems currently without it?

How are you stressing the load on the interface to make sure that you are
able to test a difference in delay?  How are you measuring the delay on your
network?  You would need to make sure you have congestion on the interface
so that the PQ portion of llq can kick in.  Unfortunately if you are doing
this, I would expect you will likely see other issue though on the
half-duplex (assuming that this is) ethernet interface once you start to
cross 40% or so utilization as I recall.  You would likely need to implement
traffic shaping on the interface as well to throttle the traffic out to a
lower limit which then the PQ could kick in with the congestion occurring
now on the interface.

I looked at one of the enterprise design guides listed below, but again here
I don't see reference made to running this on a lan interface on the
gateway; though some time is spent on setting up various qos levels on the
switch based on dscp components which can be set on the 3640 GW with the
dial-peer subcommand "ip qos".

Bryan


http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/netsol/ns17/c649/ccmigratio
n_09186a00800d67ed.pdf


  -----Original Message-----
  From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Paul Plantinga
  Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 2:59 AM
  To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
  Subject: [cisco-voip] Does PQ/CBWFQ work on 3640 Ethernet IF


  Hello,

  I'm fairly new to this but am running IOS 12.1(5)T on a cisco3640 and am
trying to implement some/any priority queueing of my voice on a 10Mg
Ethernet IF. It seems that you can configure anything.. but that doesn't
mean it will run, so from the release notes it appears I cannot do CBWFQ or
PQ on this interface, however the Cisco feature navigator says I can. I
tried to test them both and it seems that they are matching correctly and
being queued correctly but changing the voice class queue limit seems to
have no effect on the delay of my udp packets (i.e. they are being queued
behind the tcp no matter?). So are the config commands being ignored? (but
my packet losses indicate some effect in changing queue limit).
  Ultimately, what form of PQ can I run for voice in my setup?

  Regards
  Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20030729/d9aa4c15/attachment.htm
From christos at thepipeline.net  Wed Jul 30 18:56:05 2003
From: christos at thepipeline.net (christos)
Date: Wed Jul 30 18:22:50 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] newbee-voip
Message-ID: <01fe01c356e5$632d0460$6402a8c0@filemark>

Hi
I hope I dont insult this list.  I just want to know where to find how to assemble the minimal router, ios version, cpe for a small voip setup.  I want to drive it over my existing data lines which would be either IP over T1, or frame.  I am thinking about doing this in a 2600 chasis or a 3600 chasis.  What is a recommended configuration of router, cards, ios, cpe.  Also please point me to where I can quickly and accurately learn more.  Thank you. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20030730/1a331cd1/attachment.htm
From christos at thepipeline.net  Wed Jul 30 19:33:54 2003
From: christos at thepipeline.net (christos)
Date: Wed Jul 30 19:00:41 2003
Subject: [cisco-voip] newbee-voip
References: <A85EF8C2C10DA6499807D44B7FDFEB4F0120D3C0@venus.wesd.org>
Message-ID: <022001c356ea$ab7df300$6402a8c0@filemark>

Hi Scott
I will follow up on all the leads.  I am not provisionining this internally.  This is to use my ISPs VoIP SIP gateway.  They will provide the numbers and I need to provide CPE dial tone.  What I was very initially considering is driving the voice over with the data.  This has to be low-end priced, i.e. netopia router with cicso ata-186 talking to a 2600 that would? uplink the data and send the sip/voip traffic to the gateway.  I believe? this is simpler than provisioning VoIP internally for an enterprise?  Thank you for the quick and depth of response.  
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Voll, Scott 
  To: christos 
  Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 6:40 PM
  Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] newbee-voip


  We are just started our VoIP project.  The 2621 is what we are using at the remote site and a 3640 at our hub site.  Both routers will have IP Plus IOS and a NM-HDV-1T1-24 in each for the PRI to the PSTN.  We are using 3550 24 port inline power switches on the local LAN, 4k and 4500's are also options.  You will also need the Cisco Call Manager for your routing of calls.  You will need two servers (Cisco OK'd) or you can look into the ICS 7750 for running the call manager.   We are running ours over Frame-Relay to this first site.  Have you contacted your local Cisco rep?  They should be able to show you a demo.  And get you more into.  If you do need to look into training, may I suggest KnowledgeNet.com.  Great price and good classes.  



  For learning more start with this PDF I attached.  I have a few more if you want them.  



  Scott Voll

  Network Analyst, CCNA

  Willamette ESD



  -----Original Message-----
  From: christos [mailto:christos@thepipeline.net] 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 2:56 PM
  To: Cisco
  Subject: [cisco-voip] newbee-voip



  Hi

  I hope I dont insult this list.  I just want to know where to find how to assemble the minimal router, ios version, cpe for a small voip setup.  I want to drive it over my existing data lines which would be either IP over T1, or frame.  I am thinking about doing this in a 2600 chasis or a 3600 chasis.  What is a recommended configuration of router, cards, ios, cpe.  Also please point me to where I can quickly and accurately learn more.  Thank you. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20030730/f60de008/attachment.htm
