From karthi at malagasy.com  Mon Jan  5 02:25:03 2004
From: karthi at malagasy.com (Karthikeyan Arumugam)
Date: Mon Jan  5 02:52:46 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] VOIP in NAT mode
Message-ID: <04f301c3d35d$093a49a0$12f0383e@KARTHI>

Dear list,

could u pls kindly explain me how VOIP works in natted mode..
for ex i have GK and enpoints registered with GK..
but how GK identifies the particular LAN IP or natted IP and routes the call..
pls explain me and if any white paper references would be appricated..

actually i have LAN natted to a single public IP. the endpoint uses LAN address.
GK uses Public IP.
so pls give me clear picture how Voip calls works in Natted mode or which parameter governs the same.

thanks by advance
regards
karthi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20040105/681e193c/attachment.html
From o_engenheiro71 at hotmail.com  Fri Jan  2 10:51:29 2004
From: o_engenheiro71 at hotmail.com (Andrew Croch)
Date: Mon Jan  5 08:43:30 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] ATA behind a firewall
Message-ID: <Law9-F78O2YYyac9Z3r00002771@hotmail.com>


I have been trying to use ATA behind firewall without success. Please 
consider the following scenario:
ATA using H323 and with private IP, behind NAT firewall (a simple home 
router such as linksys or netgear)
Gatekeeper (gnugk) with public IP

1. Can I terminate calls in two different ATAs behind the firewall ? (I 
imagine I need to do port forwarding in the router to a single ATA so only 
one ATA can terminate the call inside the LAN)

2. Can I call from one ATA behind firewall to another ATA behind another 
firewall using the gnugk ? Do I need a proxy for that ?

3. Is SIP better than H323 for NATed ATAs ?

Thanks,
Andrew

>From: "neil quiogue" <neil@quiogue.com>
>To: "Diego Costa" <diego@ifxnw.com.uy>,        "Cisco-Voip" 
><cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] ATA behind a firewall
>Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 07:01:33 +0800
>
>Actually, with Cisco ATA system version 3.0 (released December 15), there's
>support for STUN.  You just need to download the SIP software since H.323
>and SIP are now separate.
>
>Please check with your Cisco partner.
>
>Regards, Neil
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Diego Costa" <diego@ifxnw.com.uy>
>To: "Cisco-Voip" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
>Sent: mardi 30 décembre 2003 04:17
>Subject: [cisco-voip] ATA behind a firewall
>
>
> > Hello guys,
> >
> >     I want to try cisco ATA behind a NAT, I can use SIP and H323 also,
>I've
> > read some about STUN but in the documentation of the STUN servers that I
> > review, said that they don't work with Cisco ATA's.
> >
> >
> > The scenario would be:
> >
> >  ------------                     --------------                        
>--
>--
> > ---
> > | Gatekeeper |----Public IP's----| NAT FIREWALL |----Private IP's----> |
> > ATA-1 |
> >  ------------                     --------------                        
>--
>--
> > ---
> >
> > I would appreciate any help or suggestion.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Diego.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-voip mailing list
>cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_________________________________________________________________
Expand your wine savvy — and get some great new recipes — at MSN Wine. 
http://wine.msn.com

From wsisk at cisco.com  Mon Jan  5 09:13:28 2004
From: wsisk at cisco.com (Wes Sisk)
Date: Mon Jan  5 09:13:35 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] ATA behind a firewall
In-Reply-To: <Law9-F78O2YYyac9Z3r00002771@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <ELEMLGDGDBLINAJEIOCLOEPBNGAA.wsisk@cisco.com>

Andrew,

Because h323 embeds the L3 addr (ip addr) in the L4 message (h225),
your "simple home router" will have to be h323 aware, maintain translation
tables, and do packet re-writes.

/Wes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Andrew Croch
> Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 10:51 AM
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] ATA behind a firewall
>
>
>
> I have been trying to use ATA behind firewall without success. Please
> consider the following scenario:
> ATA using H323 and with private IP, behind NAT firewall (a simple home
> router such as linksys or netgear)
> Gatekeeper (gnugk) with public IP
>
> 1. Can I terminate calls in two different ATAs behind the firewall ? (I
> imagine I need to do port forwarding in the router to a single
> ATA so only
> one ATA can terminate the call inside the LAN)
>
> 2. Can I call from one ATA behind firewall to another ATA behind another
> firewall using the gnugk ? Do I need a proxy for that ?
>
> 3. Is SIP better than H323 for NATed ATAs ?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> >From: "neil quiogue" <neil@quiogue.com>
> >To: "Diego Costa" <diego@ifxnw.com.uy>,        "Cisco-Voip"
> ><cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> >Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] ATA behind a firewall
> >Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 07:01:33 +0800
> >
> >Actually, with Cisco ATA system version 3.0 (released December
> 15), there's
> >support for STUN.  You just need to download the SIP software since H.323
> >and SIP are now separate.
> >
> >Please check with your Cisco partner.
> >
> >Regards, Neil
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Diego Costa" <diego@ifxnw.com.uy>
> >To: "Cisco-Voip" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> >Sent: mardi 30 d?cembre 2003 04:17
> >Subject: [cisco-voip] ATA behind a firewall
> >
> >
> > > Hello guys,
> > >
> > >     I want to try cisco ATA behind a NAT, I can use SIP and H323 also,
> >I've
> > > read some about STUN but in the documentation of the STUN
> servers that I
> > > review, said that they don't work with Cisco ATA's.
> > >
> > >
> > > The scenario would be:
> > >
> > >  ------------                     --------------
>
> >--
> >--
> > > ---
> > > | Gatekeeper |----Public IP's----| NAT FIREWALL |----Private
> IP's----> |
> > > ATA-1 |
> > >  ------------                     --------------
>
> >--
> >--
> > > ---
> > >
> > > I would appreciate any help or suggestion.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Diego.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-voip mailing list
> > > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >cisco-voip mailing list
> >cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Expand your wine savvy ? and get some great new recipes ? at MSN Wine.
> http://wine.msn.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

From ORebollido at fenwick.com  Wed Jan 14 11:42:40 2004
From: ORebollido at fenwick.com (Oliver Rebollido)
Date: Wed Jan 14 11:42:56 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] CallManager 3.3 with Octel Voice Mail
Message-ID: <7E48977B13157B4D88B81D2A4870248D015F07F6@exchsvc01.firm.fenwick.llp>


We're currently on CallManager 3.2(2c) with Octel as our voice mail
system and plan on upgrading to 3.3(3), but would like to get some
feedback.  Are any of you running CallManager 3.3 with Octel?

Thanks,
Oliver


ATTENTION
The information contained in this message may be legally privileged
and confidential.  It is intended to be read only by the individual
or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that
any distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and/or Fenwick & West LLP by telephone at (650) 988-8500
and delete or destroy any copy of this message.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20040114/79307ede/attachment.html
From marcin_nowacki at sevenet.pl  Wed Jan 14 12:07:01 2004
From: marcin_nowacki at sevenet.pl (Marcin Nowacki)
Date: Wed Jan 14 12:03:59 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCM MIB
Message-ID: <ADED683E8CDD9E42A02F9B3F3F1BBABA114397@serwer1.sevenet>

Hello

 

Do anybody knows how or where I can configure parameters like :

- ccmPhoneFailed 

-ccmPhoneStatusUpdate 

-ccmGatewayFailed

I would like to receive traps from my CCM to ITM .

Any help is needed :-)

Greetings

Marcin

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20040114/9c5df436/attachment.html
From versatile at direct-support.com  Wed Jan 14 12:14:51 2004
From: versatile at direct-support.com (J A Pine)
Date: Wed Jan 14 12:17:20 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] CallManager 3.3 with Octel Voice Mail
In-Reply-To: <7E48977B13157B4D88B81D2A4870248D015F07F6@exchsvc01.firm.fenwick.llp>
Message-ID: <018301c3dac1$ef1463a0$7e04a8c0@f800.ffplus.net>

We are using CallManager 3.3(3) here with Cisco Unity Voicemail 4.0(2).
Cisco Unity Voicemail package is some what of a pain to configure on
your network.  Unfortunately there isn't a standard Installation
Package.  Alot of the install you have to modify yourself in order for
it to work.  Although once it is setup, the Voicemail System is very
user friendly and offers tons of features.  The feature we use here the
most is Unified Messaging through Email.  This way you can receive your
voicemail no matter where you are as long as you have an internet
connection.  There's tons of additional features that come with it as
well, plus it is very well integrated with alot of the CallManager
features.
 
Jesse

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Oliver
Rebollido
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 8:43 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CallManager 3.3 with Octel Voice Mail


We're currently on CallManager 3.2(2c) with Octel as our voice mail
system and plan on upgrading to 3.3(3), but would like to get some
feedback.  Are any of you running CallManager 3.3 with Octel?
 
Thanks,
Oliver

ATTENTION

The information contained in this message may be legally privileged

and confidential.  It is intended to be read only by the individual

or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the reader

of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that

any distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly prohibited.



If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify

the sender and/or Fenwick & West LLP by telephone at (650) 988-8500



and delete or destroy any copy of this message.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20040114/c89df3b3/attachment.html
From diego at ifxnw.com.uy  Thu Jan 15 14:01:35 2004
From: diego at ifxnw.com.uy (Diego Costa)
Date: Thu Jan 15 13:55:34 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] Strange H323 issue...
Message-ID: <NHBBJDNFILCHLGHOFOFJMEOHDLAA.diego@ifxnw.com.uy>

I have 2 gateways called A and B, these are registered in the same
gatekeeper, using h323, when I make a call from A to B, I received fast-busy
tone, I've maked a h225 asn1 debug and I could see that the originator
gateway A put a release complete after a Setup Message.
I've got a dial-peer voip in GW A pointing to GW B with session target ras.
I've also tried changing the session target ipv4:a.b.c.d with the same
result.

But when I change the protocol to sipv2 it's works!.
I don't know what could be happening because I have anothers dial-peers in
gateway A with the same scenario using H323 and works without any problem.

Any suggestion or comment would be appreciated

Thanks!
Diego

From Scott.Voll at wesd.org  Thu Jan 15 16:57:48 2004
From: Scott.Voll at wesd.org (Voll, Scott)
Date: Thu Jan 15 16:57:53 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] How do I do Multicasting over RTP Header compression?
Message-ID: <A85EF8C2C10DA6499807D44B7FDFEB4F0120D79A@venus.wesd.org>

How do I configure my routers to do Multicasting over a Frame-relay (T1)
RTP Header compressed Link?

TIA

Scott Voll
Network Analyst, CCNA 
Willamette ESD


From MPuras at solunet.com  Thu Jan 15 17:04:56 2004
From: MPuras at solunet.com (MPuras@solunet.com)
Date: Thu Jan 15 17:05:09 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] VoIP - cRTP and VPN Tunnels
Message-ID: <719546A93D7DD511BA7800D0B7A87DF0025F5884@trinidad.solunet.com>

Hi all.  I would like to get some clarificatons on whether cRTP compresses
the IP/UDP/RTP headers after the voice traffic has been encrypted.  I need
to know whether I should be creating the IPSec site-to-site VPN tunnel from
with the firewall (Watchguard V10) that is sitting behing the Cisco 1721
router or create the tunnel from within the Cisco router itself.  I am not
sure if I create the VPN tunnel from within the firewall whether cRTP
configured on the router can still compress the IP/UDP/RTP headers for
traffic that is encrypted.  Can someone please clarify this for me.  

Thanks.


 


Mario Puras 
SoluNet/SoluServe TAC Lead 
Web Address:  www.solunet.com   
Mailto: mpuras@solunet.com 
Direct: (321) 309-1410 
Fax: (321) 676-1287  
Toll Free:  888.449.5766 (USA) / 888.SOLUNET (Canada) 

From joshua.ej.smith at usa.net  Fri Jan 16 08:47:07 2004
From: joshua.ej.smith at usa.net (joshua sahala)
Date: Fri Jan 16 08:47:17 2004
Subject: [[cisco-voip] VoIP - cRTP and VPN Tunnels]
Message-ID: <524iaPNvH9120S01.1074260827@uwdvg001.cms.usa.net>

MPuras@solunet.com wrote:

> Hi all.  I would like to get some clarificatons on whether cRTP
> compresses the IP/UDP/RTP headers after the voice traffic has been
> encrypted.  I need to know whether I should be creating the IPSec 
> site-to-site VPN tunnel from with the firewall (Watchguard V10) that 
> is sitting behing the Cisco 1721 router or create the tunnel from 
> within the Cisco router itself.  I am not sure if I create the VPN
> tunnel from within the firewall whether cRTP configured on the router
> can still compress the IP/UDP/RTP headers for traffic that is 
> encrypted.  Can someone please clarify this for me.  

mario,

you should probably do the tunnel from the cisco - if the router gets
an encrypted packet, it won't know what it is, and cannot compress the
rtp header...this is just an assumption, i haven't done it and don't
have any way to verify it

/joshua


> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Mario Puras 
> SoluNet/SoluServe TAC Lead 
> Web Address:  www.solunet.com   
> Mailto: mpuras@solunet.com 
> Direct: (321) 309-1410 
> Fax: (321) 676-1287  
> Toll Free:  888.449.5766 (USA) / 888.SOLUNET (Canada) 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 



"Walk with me through the Universe,
 And along the way see how all of us are Connected.
 Feast the eyes of your Soul,
 On the Love that abounds.
 In all places at once, seemingly endless,
 Like your own existence."
     - Stephen Hawking -



From Scott.Voll at wesd.org  Fri Jan 16 11:56:28 2004
From: Scott.Voll at wesd.org (Voll, Scott)
Date: Fri Jan 16 11:56:35 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] 7835 & 7825
Message-ID: <A85EF8C2C10DA6499807D44B7FDFEB4F0120D79F@venus.wesd.org>

Has anyone bought a 7835 or 7825 recently?  I was wondering who the
manufacturer is; HP or IBM? And what model was it?  And what were the
spec's? CPU, Memory, HDs, Etc.

TIA

Scott Voll
Network Analyst, CCNA 
Willamette ESD


From wsisk at cisco.com  Fri Jan 16 12:01:19 2004
From: wsisk at cisco.com (Wes Sisk)
Date: Fri Jan 16 12:01:27 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] 7835 & 7825
In-Reply-To: <A85EF8C2C10DA6499807D44B7FDFEB4F0120D79F@venus.wesd.org>
Message-ID: <ELEMLGDGDBLINAJEIOCLCEOLNHAA.wsisk@cisco.com>

It depends...
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/voiceapp/ps378/prod_models_home.html

ending in "i" is IBM
ending in "h" is HPQ

specs are diff for each server.
"7825" strictly speaking is EOS
7825H is avail and doc'd at the link above.

/Wes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 11:56 AM
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] 7835 & 7825
> 
> 
> Has anyone bought a 7835 or 7825 recently?  I was wondering who the
> manufacturer is; HP or IBM? And what model was it?  And what were the
> spec's? CPU, Memory, HDs, Etc.
> 
> TIA
> 
> Scott Voll
> Network Analyst, CCNA 
> Willamette ESD
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
From rratliff at cisco.com  Fri Jan 16 12:01:23 2004
From: rratliff at cisco.com (Ryan Ratliff)
Date: Fri Jan 16 12:01:37 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] 7835 & 7825
References: <A85EF8C2C10DA6499807D44B7FDFEB4F0120D79F@venus.wesd.org>
Message-ID: <055601c3dc52$5f40ff30$e5326640@amer.cisco.com>

Both the 7835 and 7825 are made by HP.  To know the specs you need more
detail on the model number.  You can find the different options at
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/voiceapp/ps378/index.html.

-Ryan
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll@wesd.org>
To: <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 11:56 AM
Subject: [cisco-voip] 7835 & 7825


> Has anyone bought a 7835 or 7825 recently?  I was wondering who the
> manufacturer is; HP or IBM? And what model was it?  And what were the
> spec's? CPU, Memory, HDs, Etc.
>
> TIA
>
> Scott Voll
> Network Analyst, CCNA
> Willamette ESD
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

From myattfam at comcast.net  Sun Jan 18 17:48:45 2004
From: myattfam at comcast.net (myattfam)
Date: Sun Jan 18 17:48:05 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco MCS-7830 upgradeable to 3.3 question
In-Reply-To: <200401171704.i0HH4dWN035660@puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <NGBBIGPLILAMBNHLNJJFKEJFCDAA.myattfam@comcast.net>

Would anyone be able to tell me if CallManager 3.3 can be installed on a
Cisco MCS-7830?  I would also be interested to know if a Compaq 1600R server
can be used to run CallManager.  I am trying to get a server together for my
home lab, of course, as cheap as possible.  Any suggestions would be
appreciated.

Thanks,
Tim

From medley at mac.com  Sun Jan 18 22:59:31 2004
From: medley at mac.com (Tim Medley)
Date: Sun Jan 18 22:59:27 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco MCS-7830 upgradeable to 3.3 question
In-Reply-To: <NGBBIGPLILAMBNHLNJJFKEJFCDAA.myattfam@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <013601c3de40$a5733550$0c00aa0a@gamepc>

Yes and yes.

I have upgraded a couple of Cisco MCS-7830's (Compaq 1600R) and a
non-cisco compaq 1600R without issue. 

Be aware that there is a good chance that the MCS7830 and/or Compaq
1600R may not be able to run CCM 4.0 without some sort of hacks.

Depending on your home lab needs/intent this may be important.

tim

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of myattfam
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 5:49 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco MCS-7830 upgradeable to 3.3 question

Would anyone be able to tell me if CallManager 3.3 can be installed on a
Cisco MCS-7830?  I would also be interested to know if a Compaq 1600R
server
can be used to run CallManager.  I am trying to get a server together
for my
home lab, of course, as cheap as possible.  Any suggestions would be
appreciated.

Thanks,
Tim

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

From myattfam at comcast.net  Mon Jan 19 03:22:46 2004
From: myattfam at comcast.net (myattfam)
Date: Mon Jan 19 03:38:22 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco MCS-7830 upgradeable to 3.3 question
In-Reply-To: <013601c3de40$a5733550$0c00aa0a@gamepc>
Message-ID: <NGBBIGPLILAMBNHLNJJFAEJHCDAA.myattfam@comcast.net>

Thanks for the info and suggestions.  

Do you remember if the Compaq 1600R required the exact 
same hardware specs as the 7830s or could you use a 
higher speed CPU?  A buddy said there is some type of 
hardware check in 3.3 and he didn't think there was 
registry hack for it.  I bought the 3.3 software, but
haven't tried installing it on anything yet.  I'm 
checking Ebay, looking for an inexpensive box.  I work 
on a SIP only project, but want to learn the fundamentals
of the H.323 side and also pass the CIPT cert exam. 

Any idea about when CCM 4.0 will be available?  Also any 
idea about when Cisco will ship a SIP version of CCM?  
Cisco has said they plan to add it, but they never have
given us a date, just "planned". :)

Thanks again,
Tim Myatt

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Medley [mailto:medley@mac.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 10:00 PM
To: 'myattfam'; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Cisco MCS-7830 upgradeable to 3.3 question


Yes and yes.

I have upgraded a couple of Cisco MCS-7830's (Compaq 1600R) and a
non-cisco compaq 1600R without issue. 

Be aware that there is a good chance that the MCS7830 and/or Compaq
1600R may not be able to run CCM 4.0 without some sort of hacks.

Depending on your home lab needs/intent this may be important.

tim

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of myattfam
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 5:49 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco MCS-7830 upgradeable to 3.3 question

Would anyone be able to tell me if CallManager 3.3 can be installed on a
Cisco MCS-7830?  I would also be interested to know if a Compaq 1600R
server
can be used to run CallManager.  I am trying to get a server together
for my
home lab, of course, as cheap as possible.  Any suggestions would be
appreciated.

Thanks,
Tim

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

From medley at mac.com  Mon Jan 19 09:49:47 2004
From: medley at mac.com (Tim Medley)
Date: Mon Jan 19 09:49:41 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco MCS-7830 upgradeable to 3.3 question
In-Reply-To: <NGBBIGPLILAMBNHLNJJFAEJHCDAA.myattfam@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <014001c3de9b$7cc37fb0$0c00aa0a@gamepc>

Tim,

The Cisco CCM installer does a hardware check and looks at the BIOS to
determine what model server it is. As long as the CPU and Memory are at
the minimum required specs for the server model, you will be ok.

The 7830/1600R's are big and bulky which would cost you a bundle to have
shipped. You might try looking on ebay for a Compaq Prosignia 740, which
is what the 7820's were. It's a mini-tower and a lot less bulky than the
7830 or 7835's.

I am running 4 Prosignia 740's in my home lab, for CCM, CCC and IPCC.

There are some registry hacks and tricks that you can use to load CCM
3.3 on a non-supported hardware platform. For exmple an IBM Gl300 or a
Compaq Armada laptop. This works in varying success to bypass the Cisco
hardware detection function. This is getting harder and harder to do
each time Cisco rev's CCM, but it is an option.

CCM 4.0 should be available this week in limited availability. You have
to go through your cisco account team and request it. In March CCM
4.0(1) will be publicly available and should be downloadable from CCO.

CCM 4.0 is supposed to introduce SIP gateway trunking. You will be able
to use SIP as a gateway protocol between CCM and a SIP capable gateway.
SIP Proxy will not be part of CCM 4.0 so SIP phones will not be able to
register directly with CCM.

More and More SIP functionality should appear in each new version of
CCM, I would guess that by the end of the year, Cisco will have
implement most of the SIP functionality/features into CCM. Cisco is a
driving force behind SIP, and supports SIP in many of it's products.

Tim





-----Original Message-----
From: myattfam [mailto:myattfam@comcast.net] 
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 3:23 AM
To: medley@mac.com; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Cisco MCS-7830 upgradeable to 3.3 question

Thanks for the info and suggestions.  

Do you remember if the Compaq 1600R required the exact 
same hardware specs as the 7830s or could you use a 
higher speed CPU?  A buddy said there is some type of 
hardware check in 3.3 and he didn't think there was 
registry hack for it.  I bought the 3.3 software, but
haven't tried installing it on anything yet.  I'm 
checking Ebay, looking for an inexpensive box.  I work 
on a SIP only project, but want to learn the fundamentals
of the H.323 side and also pass the CIPT cert exam. 

Any idea about when CCM 4.0 will be available?  Also any 
idea about when Cisco will ship a SIP version of CCM?  
Cisco has said they plan to add it, but they never have
given us a date, just "planned". :)

Thanks again,
Tim Myatt

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Medley [mailto:medley@mac.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 10:00 PM
To: 'myattfam'; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Cisco MCS-7830 upgradeable to 3.3 question


Yes and yes.

I have upgraded a couple of Cisco MCS-7830's (Compaq 1600R) and a
non-cisco compaq 1600R without issue. 

Be aware that there is a good chance that the MCS7830 and/or Compaq
1600R may not be able to run CCM 4.0 without some sort of hacks.

Depending on your home lab needs/intent this may be important.

tim

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of myattfam
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 5:49 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco MCS-7830 upgradeable to 3.3 question

Would anyone be able to tell me if CallManager 3.3 can be installed on a
Cisco MCS-7830?  I would also be interested to know if a Compaq 1600R
server
can be used to run CallManager.  I am trying to get a server together
for my
home lab, of course, as cheap as possible.  Any suggestions would be
appreciated.

Thanks,
Tim

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

From karthi at malagasy.com  Wed Jan 21 02:19:19 2004
From: karthi at malagasy.com (Karthikeyan Arumugam)
Date: Wed Jan 21 02:18:22 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] E&m Gateways
Message-ID: <04a801c3dfee$e318ce10$12f0383e@KARTHI>

Dear list,

can any one suggest me low cost Gateways With more E&M trunk ports (24ports)
in one single module
or rack module . the purpose is all remote PBXs will be connected to this
Gateway through E&M trunk through VSAT.
the Gateway will be at Central place and all the remote PBX connected to
this PBX through VSAT for trunk.
pls kindly suggest me if such gateway exist in the market ..

thanks
kind regards
karthi

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20040121/3fbee2e0/attachment.html
From amendoza at Niku.com  Wed Jan 21 11:27:54 2004
From: amendoza at Niku.com (Anthony Mendoza)
Date: Wed Jan 21 11:28:08 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] Registry Hacks for CCM Install
Message-ID: <400EA88A.9090507@niku.com>


Does anyone have a link to a page that gives details on what registry 
hacks need to occur on a non MCS box to get call Manager installed? 
I've got some older PIII hardware that I want to install Extension 
Mobility on, but they aren't Compaq or IBM boxes..

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks,
-- 
Anthony Mendoza

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message and or attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, copying, or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this e-mail or its attachments in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any system and destroy any copies.
From karthi at malagasy.com  Thu Jan 22 08:33:23 2004
From: karthi at malagasy.com (Karthikeyan Arumugam)
Date: Thu Jan 22 08:32:18 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] E&M channel banks interfaced with Gateway
Message-ID: <08e701c3e0ec$4f34a620$12f0383e@KARTHI>

dear list,

i just want to know wheter channel banks support or route calls to the specific ports.
i plan to purchase E&M channel banks which will be interfaced to VSAT and then to voice Gateway.

the setup is like this


                                                                    E&M trunks                                                             E1
many remote PBX with E&M trunks > VSAT  ----------------------  VSAT >  30ports E&M channel bank ---------- VoiceGateway ---- VOIP

i think there wont be any problem in out going calls from the remote PBX extensions. But How does Incoming call work??
in the sense how does channel bank knows which remote PBX it has to send the call...
our GW simply routes all the calls to the Channel banks . how can be implemented???
does channel bank should support DID?? All i want is how the channel bank will indentify the incmong call is for specific remote PBX.

for ex i have remote1 with PBX extensions 02210 20 XXX where XXX are extensions of the PBX, in the same way i have another remote2
with PBX extensions 02210 30 XXX . Now there is incmong call from the Public network for 02210 20 XXX, our Voice gateway simply route the with 02210 calls to this channel bank connected to E1. now how does the channel bank manuplate or send to remote1 exactly...
iam bit confused...would the channel bank have any option for this??

pls kindly reply your suggestions and guidence .

thanks
kind regards
karthi
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20040122/6aabe905/attachment.html
From Scott.Voll at wesd.org  Thu Jan 22 13:35:00 2004
From: Scott.Voll at wesd.org (Voll, Scott)
Date: Thu Jan 22 13:35:07 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] ICD \ IPCC
Message-ID: <A85EF8C2C10DA6499807D44B7FDFEB4F0120D7D0@venus.wesd.org>

Can someone tell me, or direct me to a link for what the difference is
between Standard and Enhanced IPCC?

TIA

Scott 

From medley at mac.com  Thu Jan 22 16:02:44 2004
From: medley at mac.com (Tim Medley)
Date: Thu Jan 22 16:02:39 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] ICD \ IPCC
In-Reply-To: <A85EF8C2C10DA6499807D44B7FDFEB4F0120D7D0@venus.wesd.org>
Message-ID: <00ab01c3e12b$15d21a40$0d00aa0a@gamepc>

Here you go:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/custcosw/ps1846/products_data_she
et09186a008019ade0.html


tm

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 1:35 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] ICD \ IPCC

Can someone tell me, or direct me to a link for what the difference is
between Standard and Enhanced IPCC?

TIA

Scott 

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

From ibisson at galahadinc.com  Wed Jan 14 17:52:54 2004
From: ibisson at galahadinc.com (Irene Bisson)
Date: Mon Jan 26 09:41:53 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] Caller ID question with CM
Message-ID: <003e01c3daf1$25a7bff0$0700a8c0@bad>

If "VOIP" comes up on my caller ID what does that mean?  I keep getting that.  Thanks! 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20040114/1ae81852/attachment.html
From steve at godus.freeserve.co.uk  Fri Jan 16 04:49:00 2004
From: steve at godus.freeserve.co.uk (Steven Godfrey)
Date: Mon Jan 26 09:41:58 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCM MIB
In-Reply-To: <ADED683E8CDD9E42A02F9B3F3F1BBABA114397@serwer1.sevenet>
Message-ID: <001201c3dc15$fd5361f0$8a1c10ac@intechnology.co.uk>

I think this may help:

ftp://ftp.cisco.com/pub/mibs/v2/CISCO-CCM-MIB.my


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Marcin Nowacki
Sent: Wednesday January 2004 17:07
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCM MIB


Hello

Do anybody knows how or where I can configure parameters like :
- ccmPhoneFailed 
-ccmPhoneStatusUpdate 
-ccmGatewayFailed
I would like to receive traps from my CCM to ITM .
Any help is needed J
Greetings
Marcin


________________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the 
CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further information
visit
http://www.citc.it

___


________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System. For more information on a proactive email security
service working around the clock, around the globe, visit
http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 1972 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20040116/013e785c/winmail.bin
From versatile at direct-support.com  Mon Jan 26 12:05:01 2004
From: versatile at direct-support.com (J A Pine)
Date: Mon Jan 26 12:06:05 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] Caller ID question with CM
In-Reply-To: <003e01c3daf1$25a7bff0$0700a8c0@bad>
Message-ID: <006e01c3e42e$894fc200$7e04a8c0@f800.ffplus.net>

Is this in reguards to inbound or outbound calls?  If they are inbound
calls, make sure your provider is passing caller ID to you.  Also check
the the gateway configuration and make sure you have the "Significant
Digits" set to ALL or 7 under Inbound Calls.
 
For outbound calls, there's 2 places you can configure the caller ID
displayed.  You also need to make sure that your provider is passing
caller ID for outbound calls as well.  You should check the "Caller ID
DN" on the gateway configuration for the Outbound Calls.  Also, verify
you have a # specified in the "Calling Party Transform Mask" of the
Route Pattern you are using to dial out with.  This is what it passed to
the provider to display on outbound calls.
 
Hope this helps!
 
Jesse

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Irene Bisson
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 2:53 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Caller ID question with CM


If "VOIP" comes up on my caller ID what does that mean?  I keep getting
that.  Thanks! 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20040126/a5b7f95c/attachment.html
From Scott.Voll at wesd.org  Mon Jan 26 13:39:18 2004
From: Scott.Voll at wesd.org (Voll, Scott)
Date: Mon Jan 26 13:39:24 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] Call reporting
Message-ID: <A85EF8C2C10DA6499807D44B7FDFEB4F01681353@venus.wesd.org>

Can someone direct me to some info on how to set up CAR on CM 3.3.3 to
give me the following info on a per extension bases:

-- Extension
-- # of Long distance Calls
-- number of minutes on the long distance calls
-- Called numbers
-- If I can do it, set a Price per minute and make billable invoices.

TIA

Scott


From Scott.Voll at wesd.org  Tue Jan 27 11:05:15 2004
From: Scott.Voll at wesd.org (Voll, Scott)
Date: Tue Jan 27 11:05:24 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] FXO
Message-ID: <A85EF8C2C10DA6499807D44B7FDFEB4F0120D803@venus.wesd.org>

Is anyone using CM with a V-Gateway running FXO ports?  I have a 1760
running two FXO ports and it takes 5 seconds(I timed it)to place the
call after the numbers is dialed.  Is there any way to speed that up?

TIA


Scott Voll
Network Analyst, CCNA 
Willamette ESD


From mahaffey at ebk4.com  Wed Jan 28 11:50:56 2004
From: mahaffey at ebk4.com (Brian Mahaffey)
Date: Wed Jan 28 11:51:04 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] CallManager 3.3 Install Guide
Message-ID: <001d01c3e5be$e6c56930$2801a8c0@mahaffey>

Hello,

I'm currently trying to learn how to install the callmanger 3.3.  I have a couple of books, Callmanager 3.3 a router with FXO ports and a inline powered switch.  I'm reading the Cisco installation guide to install Callmanager 3.3 and it is pretty vague in a dummy term.  I was wondering does anyone have any Step-By-Step for dummies on how to properly install configure and administrate Cisco Call Manager 3.3? Or does anyone know of a place where I can get some info?

Hey I appreciate it. Thank You

Brian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20040128/295dea07/attachment.html
From versatile at direct-support.com  Wed Jan 28 12:04:42 2004
From: versatile at direct-support.com (J A Pine)
Date: Wed Jan 28 12:08:06 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] CallManager 3.3 Install Guide
In-Reply-To: <001d01c3e5be$e6c56930$2801a8c0@mahaffey>
Message-ID: <000f01c3e5c0$d625f840$7e04a8c0@f800.ffplus.net>

All your Cisco CallManager installation, system, and administration
guides can be found at:
 
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/ps4153/index.html
 
Trust me, these documents are very detailed and step by step.  Just
follow along.  Cisco is usually pretty good at documenting things.  The
one area they lack is their Rascal service and span link documentation.
Also, their Unity docs are detailed but sloppy.  Hope this helps!
 
Jesse

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brian Mahaffey
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 8:51 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CallManager 3.3 Install Guide


Hello,
 
I'm currently trying to learn how to install the callmanger 3.3.  I have
a couple of books, Callmanager 3.3 a router with FXO ports and a inline
powered switch.  I'm reading the Cisco installation guide to install
Callmanager 3.3 and it is pretty vague in a dummy term.  I was wondering
does anyone have any Step-By-Step for dummies on how to properly install
configure and administrate Cisco Call Manager 3.3? Or does anyone know
of a place where I can get some info?
 
Hey I appreciate it. Thank You
 
Brian

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20040128/a272f24a/attachment.html
From Scott.Voll at wesd.org  Wed Jan 28 12:29:54 2004
From: Scott.Voll at wesd.org (Voll, Scott)
Date: Wed Jan 28 12:30:04 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] Wireless Headset
Message-ID: <A85EF8C2C10DA6499807D44B7FDFEB4F0168135D@venus.wesd.org>

I have a customer that would like to have a wireless headset attached to
there 7940.  Has anyone found something like that, that works?  I don't
want to have to spend $$$$ for an AP and a 7920. Especially since they
are walking in an area of about 20 x 20.  

Thanks

Scott Voll
Network Analyst, CCNA 
Willamette ESD


From versatile at direct-support.com  Wed Jan 28 12:58:13 2004
From: versatile at direct-support.com (J A Pine)
Date: Wed Jan 28 12:59:49 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] Wireless Headset
In-Reply-To: <A85EF8C2C10DA6499807D44B7FDFEB4F0168135D@venus.wesd.org>
Message-ID: <000201c3e5c8$4fa3ca60$7e04a8c0@f800.ffplus.net>

GN Netcom sent us a sample wireless headset that works with our 7940 &
7960 phones.  The headset has a button that you press when you hear a
call, basically it just lifts the handset up and the call is answered.
Very simple design, and the range is awesome.  Check them out:

http://www.gnnetcom.com/usa2003/

Jesse

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 9:30 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Wireless Headset


I have a customer that would like to have a wireless headset attached to
there 7940.  Has anyone found something like that, that works?  I don't
want to have to spend $$$$ for an AP and a 7920. Especially since they
are walking in an area of about 20 x 20.  

Thanks

Scott Voll
Network Analyst, CCNA 
Willamette ESD


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


From ORebollido at fenwick.com  Wed Jan 28 15:56:33 2004
From: ORebollido at fenwick.com (Oliver Rebollido)
Date: Wed Jan 28 15:56:46 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] Wireless Headset
Message-ID: <7E48977B13157B4D88B81D2A4870248D015F08AC@exchsvc01.firm.fenwick.llp>


I'm actually going to place an order today for the only 2 wireless
headsets that I know of that is for the 7940/7960 IP phones.  I'll be
ordering them from here:
http://gbh.com/c_featuredproducts.asp

Oliver

-----Original Message-----
From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 9:30 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Wireless Headset

I have a customer that would like to have a wireless headset attached to
there 7940.  Has anyone found something like that, that works?  I don't
want to have to spend $$$$ for an AP and a 7920. Especially since they
are walking in an area of about 20 x 20. 

Thanks

Scott Voll
Network Analyst, CCNA
Willamette ESD

ATTENTION
The information contained in this message may be legally privileged
and confidential.  It is intended to be read only by the individual
or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that
any distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and/or Fenwick & West LLP by telephone at (650) 988-8500
and delete or destroy any copy of this message.


From mahaffey at ebk4.com  Wed Jan 28 18:49:09 2004
From: mahaffey at ebk4.com (Brian Mahaffey)
Date: Wed Jan 28 18:49:17 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCM 3.3 Configuration Question
Message-ID: <001201c3e5f9$52d8e770$2b01a8c0@mahaffey>

Hello,

Im currently doing a lab setup and i think i have it all correctly setup execpt for one little tiny configuration setting somewhere.  My Cisco 7960 Phone can see the router, get an ip address but it can't find the Call Manager.  it states that the ip of the CCM is 169.xxx.xxx.xxx subnet.  Is there a way to manually configure that IP address to 192.168.1.18 instead of timing out trying to find the CCM Server?

Thank You

Brian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20040128/9e8691a5/attachment.html
From versatile at direct-support.com  Wed Jan 28 18:56:50 2004
From: versatile at direct-support.com (J A Pine)
Date: Wed Jan 28 18:58:01 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCM 3.3 Configuration Question
In-Reply-To: <001201c3e5f9$52d8e770$2b01a8c0@mahaffey>
Message-ID: <009d01c3e5fa$685d3730$7e04a8c0@f800.ffplus.net>

Try specifying the Admin VLAN to the VLAN your CallManager is on.  Then
reboot the phone.

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brian Mahaffey
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 3:49 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCM 3.3 Configuration Question


Hello,
 
Im currently doing a lab setup and i think i have it all correctly setup
execpt for one little tiny configuration setting somewhere.  My Cisco
7960 Phone can see the router, get an ip address but it can't find the
Call Manager.  it states that the ip of the CCM is 169.xxx.xxx.xxx
subnet.  Is there a way to manually configure that IP address to
192.168.1.18 instead of timing out trying to find the CCM Server?
 
Thank You
 
Brian

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20040128/1a062ca4/attachment.html
From troy at nack.net  Wed Jan 28 20:19:10 2004
From: troy at nack.net (Troy Davis)
Date: Wed Jan 28 20:19:12 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCM 3.3 Configuration Question
In-Reply-To: <001201c3e5f9$52d8e770$2b01a8c0@mahaffey>
References: <001201c3e5f9$52d8e770$2b01a8c0@mahaffey>
Message-ID: <20040129011910.GD21088@nack.net>

Try changing the DHCP server to reply with option 150, set to the
CallManager/TFTP server's IP address.  If an IOS device does DHCP, use:

ip dhcp pool voice_pool
 option 150 ip 192.168.1.18

To use a hostname instead of an IP, set option 66 instead of 150 (and make
sure you're serving valid nameserver IPs).
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2797/products_tech_note09186a0080093fbe.shtml
may help.

Troy
From amendoza at Niku.com  Wed Jan 28 20:24:39 2004
From: amendoza at Niku.com (Anthony Mendoza)
Date: Wed Jan 28 20:24:53 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] CCM 3.3 Configuration Question
In-Reply-To: <20040129011910.GD21088@nack.net>
References: <001201c3e5f9$52d8e770$2b01a8c0@mahaffey>
	<20040129011910.GD21088@nack.net>
Message-ID: <401860D7.2080901@niku.com>


You can also make sure CiscoCCM1.<your domain> resolves to your call 
manager.  I've had to do that at remote offices where we were serving 
DHCP from network devices and did not have the option to send any custom 
dhcp options, like option 150 or 66.

On 1/28/2004 5:19 PM, Troy Davis wrote:

> Try changing the DHCP server to reply with option 150, set to the
> CallManager/TFTP server's IP address.  If an IOS device does DHCP, use:
> 
> ip dhcp pool voice_pool
>  option 150 ip 192.168.1.18
> 
> To use a hostname instead of an IP, set option 66 instead of 150 (and make
> sure you're serving valid nameserver IPs).
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2797/products_tech_note09186a0080093fbe.shtml
> may help.
> 
> Troy
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-- 
Anthony Mendoza

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message and or attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, copying, or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this e-mail or its attachments in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any system and destroy any copies.
From marcin_nowacki at sevenet.pl  Thu Jan 29 02:50:41 2004
From: marcin_nowacki at sevenet.pl (Marcin Nowacki)
Date: Thu Jan 29 02:47:33 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] Wireless Headset
Message-ID: <ADED683E8CDD9E42A02F9B3F3F1BBABA1143DD@serwer1.sevenet>

Does anyone knows how it is connected to 7940/60 ?

Marcin

-----Original Message-----
From: Oliver Rebollido [mailto:ORebollido@fenwick.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 9:57 PM
To: Voll, Scott; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Wireless Headset


I'm actually going to place an order today for the only 2 wireless
headsets that I know of that is for the 7940/7960 IP phones.  I'll be
ordering them from here:
http://gbh.com/c_featuredproducts.asp

Oliver

-----Original Message-----
From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 9:30 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Wireless Headset

I have a customer that would like to have a wireless headset attached to
there 7940.  Has anyone found something like that, that works?  I don't
want to have to spend $$$$ for an AP and a 7920. Especially since they
are walking in an area of about 20 x 20. 

Thanks

Scott Voll
Network Analyst, CCNA
Willamette ESD

ATTENTION
The information contained in this message may be legally privileged
and confidential.  It is intended to be read only by the individual
or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that
any distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and/or Fenwick & West LLP by telephone at (650) 988-8500
and delete or destroy any copy of this message.


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



From santiago.felipe at acens.com  Thu Jan 29 05:21:41 2004
From: santiago.felipe at acens.com (Santiago Felipe Perez)
Date: Thu Jan 29 05:21:48 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] Session target to an IP of VRF
Message-ID: <003201c3e651$b0b139d0$4400140a@macorp.acens.priv>

Hi,

is it possible to create a dial-peer voip with a session targert ipv4:
pointing to an IP of one VPN (vrf) ?

Santiago Felipe P?rez

From marcin_nowacki at sevenet.pl  Thu Jan 29 05:58:22 2004
From: marcin_nowacki at sevenet.pl (Marcin Nowacki)
Date: Thu Jan 29 05:55:14 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] Wireless Headset
Message-ID: <ADED683E8CDD9E42A02F9B3F3F1BBABA1143E3@serwer1.sevenet>

Ok. I've already checked it . It is connected between normal handset and
telephone.

Marcin

-----Original Message-----
From: Marcin Nowacki 
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 8:51 AM
To: Oliver Rebollido; Voll, Scott; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Wireless Headset

Does anyone knows how it is connected to 7940/60 ?

Marcin

-----Original Message-----
From: Oliver Rebollido [mailto:ORebollido@fenwick.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 9:57 PM
To: Voll, Scott; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Wireless Headset


I'm actually going to place an order today for the only 2 wireless
headsets that I know of that is for the 7940/7960 IP phones.  I'll be
ordering them from here:
http://gbh.com/c_featuredproducts.asp

Oliver

-----Original Message-----
From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 9:30 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Wireless Headset

I have a customer that would like to have a wireless headset attached to
there 7940.  Has anyone found something like that, that works?  I don't
want to have to spend $$$$ for an AP and a 7920. Especially since they
are walking in an area of about 20 x 20. 

Thanks

Scott Voll
Network Analyst, CCNA
Willamette ESD

ATTENTION
The information contained in this message may be legally privileged
and confidential.  It is intended to be read only by the individual
or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that
any distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify
the sender and/or Fenwick & West LLP by telephone at (650) 988-8500
and delete or destroy any copy of this message.


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



From joshua.ej.smith at usa.net  Thu Jan 29 13:56:49 2004
From: joshua.ej.smith at usa.net (joshua sahala)
Date: Thu Jan 29 13:56:59 2004
Subject: [[cisco-voip] Session target to an IP of VRF]
Message-ID: <857iaCs5x1200S07.1075402609@uwdvg007.cms.usa.net>

"Santiago Felipe Perez" <santiago.felipe@acens.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> is it possible to create a dial-peer voip with a session targert ipv4:
> pointing to an IP of one VPN (vrf) ?

you could create a route pointing at that vrf, but the session target
needs to be an address of a terminating gateway

/joshua

> 
> Santiago Felipe P?rez
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 



"Walk with me through the Universe,
 And along the way see how all of us are Connected.
 Feast the eyes of your Soul,
 On the Love that abounds.
 In all places at once, seemingly endless,
 Like your own existence."
     - Stephen Hawking -



From psirt at cisco.com  Thu Jan 29 15:45:00 2004
From: psirt at cisco.com (Cisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team)
Date: Thu Jan 29 16:27:49 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco Security Advisory: Buffer Overrun in Microsoft
	Windows 2000 Workstation Service (MS03-049)
Message-ID: <200401292125.i0TLPk815851@rooster.cisco.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Cisco Security Advisory: Buffer Overrun in Microsoft Windows 2000
Workstation Service (MS03-049)

Revision 1.0 - FINAL

For Public Release 2004 January 29 18:00 UTC (GMT)

- -----------------------------------------------------------------------

Contents
========

    Summary
    Affected Products
    Details
    Impact
    Software Versions and Fixes
    Obtaining Fixed Software
    Workarounds
    Exploitation and Public Announcements
    Status of This Notice: FINAL
    Distribution
    Revision History
    Cisco Security Procedures

- -----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary
=======

This advisory describes a vulnerability that affects Cisco products and
applications running on Microsoft Windows 2000.

A vulnerability has been discovered that enables an attacker to execute
arbitrary code or perform a denial of service (DoS) against the server.
These vulnerabilities were discovered and publicly announced by
Microsoft in their Microsoft Security Bulletin MS03-049. More
information about the vulnerability can be found at the following URL:

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-049.asp 

All Cisco products and applications that are using unpatched Microsoft
Windows 2000 are vulnerable.

This advisory is available at:

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20040129-ms03-049.shtml

Affected Products
=================

To determine if a product is vulnerable, review the list below. If the
software versions or configuration information are provided, then only
those combinations are vulnerable. This is a list of appliance software
which needs patches downloaded from Cisco.

  * Cisco CallManager
   
  * Cisco Building Broadband Service Manager (BBSM)
   
      + BBSM Version 5.2
       
      + HotSpot 1.0
       
  * Cisco Customer Response Application Server (CRA)
   
  * Cisco Personal Assistant (PA)
   
  * Cisco Conference Connection (CCC)
   
  * Cisco Emergency Responder (CER)
   
  * Cisco IP Call Center Express (IPCC Express)
   
  * Cisco Internet Service Node (ISN)
   
Other Cisco products which run on a Microsoft based operating system
should strongly consider loading the patch from Microsoft at the
following URL:

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-049.asp 

This list is not all inclusive. Please refer to Microsoft's bulletin if
you think you have an affected Microsoft platform.

  * Cisco Unity
   
  * Cisco Building Broadband Service Manager (BBSM) versions 5.1 and
    prior
   
  * Cisco uOne Enterprise Edition
   
  * Cisco Latitude products
   
  * Cisco Network Registrar (CNR)
   
  * Cisco Internet Service Node (ISN)
   
  * Cisco Intelligent Contact Manager (ICM) (Hosted and Enterprise)
   
  * Cisco IP Contact Center (IPCC) (Express and Enterprise)
   
  * Cisco E-mail Manager (CEM)
   
  * Cisco Collaboration Server (CCS)
   
  * Cisco Dynamic Content Adapter (DCA)
   
  * Cisco Media Blender (CMB)
   
  * TrailHead (Part of the Web Gateway solution)
   
  * Cisco Networking Services for Active Directory (CNS/AD)
   
  * Cisco SN 5400 Series Storage Routers (driver to interface to
    Windows server)
   
  * CiscoWorks
   
      + CiscoWorks VPN/Security Management Solution (CWVMS)
       
      + User Registration Tool
       
      + Lan Management Solution
       
      + Routed WAN Management
       
      + Service Management
       
      + VPN/Security Management Solution
       
      + IP Telephony Environment Monitor
       
      + Small Network Management Solution
       
      + QoS Policy Manager
       
      + Voice Manager
       
  * Cisco Transport Manager (CTM)
   
  * Cisco Broadband Troubleshooter (CBT)
   
  * DOCSIS CPE Configurator
   
  * Cisco Secure Applications
   
      + Cisco Secure Scanner
       
      + Cisco Secure Policy Manager (CSPM)
       
      + Access Control Server (ACS)
       
  * Videoconferencing Applications
   
      + IP/VC 3540 Video Rate Matching Module
       
      + IP/VC 3540 Application Server
       
  * Cisco IP/TV Server
   
Details
=======

Default installations of Microsoft Windows 2000 Server automatically
enable the Workstation service. This vulnerability is not isolated to
Microsoft Windows 2000 Workstation edition.

The Microsoft Windows 2000 Workstation service is vulnerable to buffer
overflows and denial of service (DoS) attacks. This vulnerability can
be exploited to execute arbitrary code on a computer system or to
disrupt normal operation of the server.

The vulnerability has been described in more detail at the following
URL:

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-049.asp 

Impact
======

According to Microsoft, an attacker could gain System privileges on an
affected system, or could cause the Workstation service to fail. For a
full list of symptoms and for the most up to date information, please
see Microsoft's Bulletin at the following URL:

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-049.asp 

Software Versions and Fixes
===========================

Affected Cisco IP Telephony Applications: for all versions of Cisco
CallManager and all compatible versions of Cisco IP Interactive Voice
Response (IP IVR), Cisco IP Call Center Express (IPCC Express), Cisco
Personal Assistant (PA), Cisco Emergency Responder (CER), Cisco
Conference Connection (CCC), and Cisco Internet Service Node (ISN).

Customers should apply the win-OS-Upgrade-k9.2000-2-5sr4.exe or later
package located at the following URL: 

http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/cmva-3des?psrtdcat20e2

Cisco Building Broadband Service Manager

For BBSM Version 5.2, apply BBSM52SP2.exe found at the following URL: 

http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/bbsm52

Instructions for installing service patches on BBSM can be found at the
following URL: 

http://cco.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/netmgtsw/ps533/products_user_guide_chapter09186a00801da1bc.html

Cisco HotSpot 1.0

For HotSpot1.0, apply Service Pack 1 available at the following URL: 

http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/bbsmhs10

Obtaining Fixed Software
========================

Where Cisco provides the operating system bundled with the product,
Cisco is offering software upgrades free of charge to address these
vulnerabilities for all affected customers. Customers may only install
and expect support for the feature sets they have purchased.

Customers with contracts should obtain upgraded software through their
regular update channels. For most customers, this means that upgrades
should be obtained through the Software Center on Cisco's worldwide
website at http://www.cisco.com.

Customers whose Cisco products are provided or maintained through prior
or existing agreement with third-party support organizations such as
Cisco Partners, authorized resellers, or service providers should
contact that support organization for assistance with the upgrade,
which should be free of charge.

Customers who purchase direct from Cisco but who do not hold a Cisco
service contract and customers who purchase through third-party vendors
but are unsuccessful at obtaining fixed software through their point of
sale should get their upgrades by contacting the Cisco Technical
Assistance Center (TAC). TAC contacts are as follows.

  * +1 800 553 2447 (toll free from within North America)
   
  * +1 408 526 7209 (toll call from anywhere in the world)
   
  * e-mail: tac@cisco.com
   
Please have your product serial number available and give the URL of
this notice as evidence of your entitlement to a free upgrade. Free
upgrades for non-contract customers must be requested through the TAC.

Please do not contact either "psirt@cisco.com" or
"security-alert@cisco.com" for software upgrades.

If you need assistance with the implementation of the workarounds, or
have questions on the workarounds, please contact the Cisco Technical
Assistance Center (TAC).

  * +1 800 553 2447 (toll free from within North America)
   
  * +1 408 526 7209 (toll call from anywhere in the world)
   
  * e-mail: tac@cisco.com
   
See http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/687/Directory/DirTAC.shtml for
additional TAC contact information, including special localized
telephone numbers and instructions and e-mail addresses for use in
various languages.

Workarounds
===========

Currently there are no known active worms exploiting this
vulnerability. However, users can protect themselves from the potential
infection by applying access control lists (ACLs).

The Workstation service receives packets on UDP and TCP ports 138, 139
and 445. Restricting traffic to these ports may help mitigate the
spread of any worm that exploits this vulnerability. Restricting
traffic to these ports may also help prevent improper access, DoS, and
other non-worm related exploitation.

Please also reference the Microsoft posting for additional workarounds:

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-049.asp 

Customers who have firewalls, or have deployed Network Intrusion
Detection Systems (NIDS) and/or Host Intrusion Detection Systems (HIDS)
in their network may be able to use these devices to detect attempted
exploitation or protect themselves from exploitation of this
vulnerability. Customers with these products should refer to their
product documentation from their vendor for information on how to
properly configure these devices.

Customers who have Cisco IDS devices installed in their network can
find more information at the following URL: 

http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/front.x/csec/csecHome.pl

Exploitation and Public Announcements
=====================================

The Cisco PSIRT is not aware of any active exploitation of this
vulnerability.

Status of This Notice: FINAL
============================

This is a final advisory. Although Cisco cannot guarantee the accuracy
of all statements in this advisory, all of the facts have been checked
to the best of our ability. Cisco does not anticipate issuing updated
versions of this advisory. Should there be a significant, material
change in the facts, Cisco may update this advisory.

A stand-alone copy or paraphrase of the text of this security advisory
that omits the distribution URL in the following section is an
uncontrolled copy, and may lack important information or contain
factual errors.

Distribution
============

This advisory will be posted on Cisco's worldwide website at 

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20040129-ms030-049.shtml

In addition to worldwide web posting, a text version of this notice is
clear-signed with the Cisco PSIRT PGP key and is posted to the
following e-mail and Usenet news recipients.

  * cust-security-announce@cisco.com
   
  * bugtraq@securityfocus.com
   
  * full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
   
  * vulnwatch@vulnwatch.org
   
  * first-teams@first.org (includes CERT/CC)
   
  * cisco@spot.colorado.edu
   
  * cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
   
  * comp.dcom.sys.cisco
   
  * Various internal Cisco mailing lists
   
Future updates of this advisory, if any, will be placed on Cisco's
worldwide website, but may or may not be actively announced on mailing
lists or newsgroups. Users concerned about this problem are encouraged
to check the above URL for any updates.

Revision History
================

+----------------------------------------+
| Revision |                 | Initial   |
| 1.0      | 2004-January-29 | public    |
|          |                 | release.  |
+----------------------------------------+

Cisco Security Procedures
=========================

Complete information on reporting security vulnerabilities in Cisco
products, obtaining assistance with security incidents, and registering
to receive security information from Cisco, is available on Cisco's
worldwide website at:

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/sec_incident_response.shtml

This includes instructions for press inquiries regarding Cisco
security notices. All Cisco security advisories are available at
http://www.cisco.com/go/psirt.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (SunOS)

iD8DBQFAGXivezGozzK2tZARAhk7AKD6b14z4fwTE8SFtg1hztVLvJp0nwCgkGwA
d0sYGIdzumtmlyWXaqUcqmw=
=2WYM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From solaalabi at yahoo.com  Fri Jan 30 01:43:48 2004
From: solaalabi at yahoo.com (=?iso-8859-1?q?Sola=20Alabi?=)
Date: Fri Jan 30 01:43:53 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] called failed
Message-ID: <20040130064348.87780.qmail@web41202.mail.yahoo.com>

Hi Guys ,
   am  new to Voip , got AS 5300 on my platform but experience alot of failed call what can I do to resolve this issue thanks.
                            
 
 


		
---------------------------------
Chat instantly with your online friends? 
Get the FREE Yahoo!Messenger
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20040130/5a4715ff/attachment.html
From sgsubs at intechnology.co.uk  Fri Jan 30 06:07:37 2004
From: sgsubs at intechnology.co.uk (SGSubs)
Date: Fri Jan 30 06:50:39 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] FXO
In-Reply-To: <A85EF8C2C10DA6499807D44B7FDFEB4F0120D803@venus.wesd.org>
Message-ID: <000001c3e721$453edab0$581c10ac@intechnology.co.uk>

voice-port 2/0
 timeouts interdigit 4


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
> Sent: Tuesday January 2004 16:05
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] FXO
> 
> 
> Is anyone using CM with a V-Gateway running FXO ports?  I have a 1760
> running two FXO ports and it takes 5 seconds(I timed it)to place the
> call after the numbers is dialed.  Is there any way to speed that up?
> 
> TIA
> 
> 
> Scott Voll
> Network Analyst, CCNA 
> Willamette ESD
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the 
> CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further 
> information visit
> http://www.citc.it
> 
> ___

________________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the 
CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further information visit
http://www.citc.it

___
From Scott.Voll at wesd.org  Fri Jan 30 10:21:40 2004
From: Scott.Voll at wesd.org (Voll, Scott)
Date: Fri Jan 30 10:22:28 2004
Subject: [cisco-voip] FXO
Message-ID: <A85EF8C2C10DA6499807D44B7FDFEB4F01681363@venus.wesd.org>

Sorry, I forgot to update on this...

I only had one phone line plugged in and it was trying to dial via the
second FXO that did not have a Phone line.  So it tried to dial,
couldn't then tried the FXO that did have a Phone line.

Layer one; you just can't have layer two without it.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: SGSubs [mailto:sgsubs@intechnology.co.uk] 
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 3:08 AM
To: Voll, Scott
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] FXO

voice-port 2/0
 timeouts interdigit 4


> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
> Sent: Tuesday January 2004 16:05
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] FXO
> 
> 
> Is anyone using CM with a V-Gateway running FXO ports?  I have a 1760
> running two FXO ports and it takes 5 seconds(I timed it)to place the
> call after the numbers is dialed.  Is there any way to speed that up?
> 
> TIA
> 
> 
> Scott Voll
> Network Analyst, CCNA 
> Willamette ESD
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the 
> CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further 
> information visit
> http://www.citc.it
> 
> ___

________________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the 
CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further information
visit
http://www.citc.it

___
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

