[cisco-voip] css, partitions and extension mobility

[Wes Sisk]

Leo,

I have not been able to test yet.  I am not aware of any special 
treatment of CSS when EM is used.  Please open a TAC case.

/Wes

Leonardo D'Urso wrote:

>Wes,
>
>I apologize for pressing, but have you notice or is it this a good
>argument for a tac query?
>Please let me know.
>
>thanks in advance.
>Leonardo
>
>
>On Sat, 22 May 2004, Wes Sisk wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Leonardo,
>>
>>I suspect ! is going to be a special case because it implies any digit, any
>>number of digits.  Therefore the idea of "better match" pretty much
>>disappears.
>>
>>We typically use calculations to see which is "better match"
>>
>>Example:
>>
>>91X = (1 possible match) * (1 possible match) * (10 possible matches) = 10
>>1XX = (1 possible match) * (10 possible matches) * (10 possible matches) =
>>100
>>
>>Therefore 91X is a closer match if both 9 and 1 are matched.
>>
>>However in the case of a variable length dialplan, this analysis does not
>>hold up.  I need to do a bit of testing, but I fear that solution was tested
>>with the fixed length US dialplan in mind.
>>
>>/Wes
>>
>>    
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Leonardo D'Urso [mailto:durso at alter.it]
>>>Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 11:09 AM
>>>To: Wes Sisk
>>>Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] css, partitions and extension mobility
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Hi Wes, hi all
>>>
>>>oh no Leonardo again! ;-)
>>>
>>>I have read the chapter in online manual (chapter 7 page 8,9), and I have
>>>read chapter 9 of Paul Girard: Troubleshooting ecc... I think my
>>>configuration respect the closest match concept.
>>>
>>>I have the same configuration on another customer of mine, with a
>>>difference, lines(DN) are defined statically on phones and no user device
>>>profile is in use. In this case all works fine.
>>>
>>>This is an example of configuration in which I describe all of components:
>>>
>>>the phone can call everyone. So it has a css in which there is a partition
>>>in which I have the rp 0.! that points to the voice gateway for this
>>>location.
>>>
>>>the user device profile, in which I have the line, has a css in which I
>>>have a partition in which I have a rp that blocks all calls to the
>>>international. This route pattern is 0.00!
>>>
>>>when I call:
>>>
>>>0001-555-5555555 (where the first zero is used to catch the line)
>>>
>>>the ccs of the user device profile defined into DN should match the block,
>>>and then go to the bogus voice gateway.
>>>
>>>But what happens is that the call is routed to voice gateway, and so this
>>>approach seems that don't works.
>>>
>>>Any idea?
>>>
>>>
>>>thanks in advance.
>>>Leonardo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Sat, 22 May 2004, Wes Sisk wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Leonard,
>>>>
>>>>It sounds like you are attemting use "An Alternative Approach
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>to Configuring
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Calling Search Spaces" found in the Callmanager 3.3 SRND
>>>>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/largeent/it/ese/srnd.html
>>>>
>>>>In order the for the blocking/permitting patterns to work as
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>described, your
>>>      
>>>
>>>>'permit' patterns must be a closer match than your 'deny' patterns.  The
>>>>"closest match" logic is best described in Chapter 9 of Paul
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Giralt's book
>>>      
>>>
>>>>"Troubleshooting Cisco IP Telephony".
>>>>
>>>>Currently Dialed Number Analyzer actually uses its own match
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>logic instead
>>>      
>>>
>>>>of using that of the currently active ccm.exe process.  This can lead to
>>>>incorrect results in very specific corner cases, such as yours.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>> 95% of the
>>>      
>>>
>>>>time, DNA should provide accurate results.
>>>>
>>>>/Wes
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>>>>>[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>Leonardo D'Urso
>>>      
>>>
>>>>>Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 6:45 PM
>>>>>To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>>Subject: [cisco-voip] css, partitions and extension mobility
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>hi there,
>>>>>
>>>>>I have done this configuration:
>>>>>
>>>>>my phones has a css in which I have a route pattern that
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>authorize all for
>>>      
>>>
>>>>>the phone.
>>>>>
>>>>>I have user device profile in which I have configured a css with
>>>>>partitions that don't permit for example international calls.
>>>>>
>>>>>When I try to verify with Dialed number analyzer all works fine, the
>>>>>international call, that is NOT authorized match the rule and ends on
>>>>>bogus gateway.
>>>>>
>>>>>But when I do this making phone call the call is routed.
>>>>>
>>>>>Is this an Extension mobility limit? I have this configuration without
>>>>>extension mobility and all works fine.
>>>>>
>>>>>thanks in advance,
>>>>>Leonardo
>>>>>
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>cisco-voip mailing list
>>>>>cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>>          
>>>>>