[cisco-voip] Analog Cordless Phones

Nick Marus nmarus at gmail.com
Mon Mar 21 14:46:34 EST 2005


Not sure about the 24port fxs cards, but I do know that the ata188's
support feature codes similar to the vg248's.


On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:07:40 -0800, Anthony Mendoza <amendoza at niku.com> wrote:
> We're going to look into the feature codes..that might just do the
> trick.  I was searching on Cisco's site and I don't see a reference the
> feature code anywhere except for the VG248, is that the only product
> that supports it?  In our main office we have a Cat6509 with the 24port
> FXS blades (2 of them), but I can't find anything that references me
> being able to use feature codes with those cards.  Any help would be
> appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> Anthony Mendoza
> 
> Lelio Fulgenzi wrote this message, dated 3/17/2005 8:59 AM:
> > The VG248 has feature codes you can program using the # and * key. Have
> > you tried that? I'm sure I tried transfering using the feature codes and
> > it worked.
> >
> >
> >     ----- Original Message -----
> >     *From:* Anthony Mendoza <mailto:amendoza at Niku.com>
> >     *To:* cisco VoIP List <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> >     *Sent:* Thursday, March 17, 2005 11:23 AM
> >     *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Analog Cordless Phones
> >
> >     All,
> >
> >     I've got a situation where we would like to use wireless phones in one
> >     of our offices, but do not want to use the VoIP 802.11 Wireless Phones.
> >       Our solution is to use one of our Analog ports off of our VG248
> >     Gateway.  We get dial tone and everything fine, but transferring via
> >     hook switch does not produce reliable results with the handset we have.
> >       Is anyone doing this and can recommend a more compatible handset?
> >     This is for our receptionist in our UK office.  I realize your
> >     suggestions may only be for US brand names, but I'm quite happy to ship
> >     them a phone once I can verify results here in the US.
> >
> >     We have a TAC case open now to try and determine the incompatibility,
> >     but since they do not directly support analog end user devices they can
> >     only provide so many tips.
> >
> >     Thanks,
> >     --
> >     Anthony
> >
> >
> >     CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message and
> >     or attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
> >     addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any
> >     review, retransmission, dissemination, copying, or other use of this
> >     information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
> >     prohibited. If you received this e-mail or its attachments in error,
> >     please contact the sender and delete the material from any system and
> >     destroy any copies.
> >
> >     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     cisco-voip mailing list
> >     cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> >     https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 


-- 
Nick Marus
nmarus at gmail.com


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list