[cisco-voip] anyone running 4.1(3)sr3 yet?

Erick Bergquist erickbe at yahoo.com
Sat Mar 4 15:55:32 EST 2006


So I see 4.1(3)sr3 has been pulled from CCO now. 

Is the bugs below reason or something more?? 

--- Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:

> That is what broke things.  CSCsd54037 is what fixes
> it.
> 
> /Wes
> 
> Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:
> > The bug says it's fixed in 4.1(3)SR03 and the
> release notes say the 
> > same. Is this incorrect? Also, can you translate
> the issue? Is it a 
> > CDR problem in the end?
> >  
> >
> > Resolved Caveats for Cisco CallManager - Release
> 4.1(3)SR3:*//*
> >
> > *4.1(3**)SR3***
> >
> > CSCeg25365: E-mail information erased after PAB
> entry edited on phone
> >
> > CSCeg42700: Find/List Trunks:Search RP by % works
> like IsEmpty
> >
> > CSCeg65968: User unable to edit PAB entry if
> nickname crosses 26 character
> >
> > CSCsa70351: CFNA/CFB External not working for T1
> CAS or BRI loopback calls
> >
> > CSCsa99905: CFNCExtCallingSearchSpace shared
> setting not getting reset 
> > to default
> >
> > CSCsb07528: AXL listUserByName does not return
> user with blank First Name
> >
> > */CSCsb15241: CCM send internal conference bridge
> number as the 
> > connected party number/*
> >
> > ** 
> > ** 
> >
> >     ----- Original Message -----
> >     *From:* Ryan Ratliff
> <mailto:rratliff at cisco.com>
> >     *To:* erickbe at yahoo.com
> <mailto:erickbe at yahoo.com>
> >     *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck-nether.net
> <mailto:cisco-voip at puck-nether.net>
> >     *Sent:* Thursday, March 02, 2006 6:15 PM
> >     *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] anyone running
> 4.1(3)sr3 yet?
> >
> >     If you are using DMS-100 PRIs with hold off
> going to SR3 for now.   
> >     See CSCsb15241 for details.
> >
> >     -Ryan
> >
> >     On Mar 1, 2006, at 10:21 PM, Erick Bergquist
> wrote:
> >
> >     On a lab system, so far so good. Anything to
> look or
> >     watch out for? Have a customer planning on
> loading it
> >     later this week.
> >
> >     --- Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com
> <mailto:wsisk at cisco.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     > How's it performing?
> >     >
> >     >
> _______________________________________________
> >     > cisco-voip mailing list
> >     > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> >     >
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >     >
> >
> >
> >    
> __________________________________________________
> >     Do You Yahoo!?
> >     Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> >     http://mail.yahoo.com
> >    
> _______________________________________________
> >     cisco-voip mailing list
> >     cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> >    
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >    
> _______________________________________________
> >     cisco-voip mailing list
> >     cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> >    
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >   
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list