[cisco-voip] unassigned DNs in 4.x

[Kevin Thorngren]

I agree that Unassigned DN's can be a pain.  I have run into issues  
where I forgot I had added and deleted a DN to only get an error when  
adding it again.  A service parameter or other mechanism to control  
this would be a good idea.  I am sure this is said quite often but if  
there is something you would like changed work with your Cisco account  
team to create a feature request for this change.  There is no  
guarantee that the feature will be added but if multiple customers add  
their business case to the feature request then it may help to increase  
the chances of implementing the feature.  Being a Cisco employee, there  
is not much pull I have with development :-)

Kevin

On Mar 23, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi wrote:

> I think there should be service parameters for stuff like this. ;)
>  
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---------
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Network Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Sanity First : Number of days with fewer than
> 50 messages in my inbox at the end of the day:         14
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Kevin Thorngren
>> To: Voll, Scott
>> Cc: Matt Slaga (US) ; Seth Call ; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net ; Lelio  
>> Fulgenzi
>> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 2:55 PM
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] unassigned DNs in 4.x
>>
>> No, I wouldn't like to chime in ;-)
>>
>> Actually this URL explains why this feature was added:
>> http://www.ciscotaccc.com/voice/showcase?case=K91031031
>>
>> "Unassigned DNs allow customers to continue forwarding to voice mail  
>> or another destination for DNs that are no longer assigned to  
>> devices. This happens often when employees are reassigned or  
>> terminated."
>>
>> We had requirements from some customers for this type of feature.
>>
>> HTH,
>> Kevin
>> On Mar 23, 2006, at 1:10 PM, Voll, Scott wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Wes, Ryan, or Kevin like to chime in?
>>>  
>>> Scott
>>>  
>>> PS.  I’m with you all
>>>  
>>>
>>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net  
>>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio  
>>> Fulgenzi
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 8:21 AM
>>> To: Matt Slaga (US); Seth Call; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] unassigned DNs in 4.x
>>>  
>>> You have to remember that some people are doing in-house management,  
>>> so more work equals less $$. :(
>>>  
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>> -----------
>>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>>> Network Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G  
>>> 2W1
>>> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
>>> ^
>>> Sanity First : Number of days with fewer than
>>> 50 messages in my inbox at the end of the day:         14
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Matt Slaga (US)
>>>> To: Seth Call ; Lelio Fulgenzi ; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:31 AM
>>>> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] unassigned DNs in 4.x
>>>>  
>>>> Well, it does create more work for people like us....  That equals  
>>>> $$....
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net  
>>>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Seth Call
>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 9:25 AM
>>>> To: Lelio Fulgenzi; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] unassigned DNs in 4.x
>>>> There has to be a good reason for it, but I sure wish I knew what  
>>>> it was… maybe line creation is expensive?  And so if you are  
>>>> mucking around with lines and partitions a lot…
>>>>  
>>>> I don’t like it either, though
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net  
>>>> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio  
>>>> Fulgenzi
>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 8:20 AM
>>>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>> Subject: [cisco-voip] unassigned DNs in 4.x
>>>>  
>>>> ok, who else doesn't like how DNs hang around after you delete  
>>>> them? i can understand an actual deletion, but if i create a DN in  
>>>> partition A and move it to partition B, voila, an unassigned DN in  
>>>> partition A now exists.
>>>>  
>>>> ugh.
>>>>  
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>>> ------------
>>>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>>>> Network Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G  
>>>> 2W1
>>>> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
>>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
>>>> ^^
>>>> Sanity First : Number of days with fewer than
>>>> 50 messages in my inbox at the end of the day:         14
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Disclaimer:
>>>>
>>>> This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
>>>> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
>>>> designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
>>>> intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
>>>> this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
>>>> this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
>>>> unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
>>>> notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
>>>> from your computer. Thank you.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 7185 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060323/c1a2190f/attachment.bin