[cisco-voip] Unity External Transcoding

Kevin Thorngren kthorngr at cisco.com
Tue Mar 28 12:33:20 EST 2006


sure they have command G729 codecs.  Should be: sure they have common 
G729 codecs :-)


On Mar 28, 2006, at 10:59 AM, Kevin Thorngren wrote:

> I would first suspect a mismatch between the G729 codec(s) that the GW
> is configured for and what the Transcoder is configured to support.
> Check the IOS config of both routers to make sure they have command
> G729 codecs.
>
> Kevin
> On Mar 28, 2006, at 10:49 AM, Pritchard, Jon wrote:
>
>> I'm attempting to enable Unity external transcoding for g729
>> connections to offload CPU and improve voice quality.  I have a PVDM2
>> based DSPFarm with 80 transcoder sessions.  I have successfully
>> disabled native transcoding on Unity and have verified external
>> transcoding is in play when calling Unity internally (VM or AA) from a
>> Region set for g729 relative to the Region Unity is in.   However,
>> when external calls are routed to Unity from the g729 regions I get
>> disconnected with what "sounds" like a codec mismatch.
>>
>> I compared the CCM traces (detailed/debug) of the successful internal
>> calls vs. the failed external calls.  The successful calls showed the
>> MediaResourceManager negotiating the transcoder connection and minimal
>> MediaTerminatePointControl activity.  The unsuccessful calls didn't
>> show a specific error but does show trying to push a G711ulaw payload
>> during the MediaTerminationPointControl phase and no interaction with
>> the MediaResourceManager to set up transcoding.
>>
>> The gateways involved are 1760 H323 on 12.3(8)T4 and have both G711
>> and G729 codecs enabled via codec class in the dial-peers, pref 1 G711
>> and pref 2. G729.
>>
>> The really weird part is the external connections have been and still
>> are successful when Unity is running native transcoding with the rest
>> of the configuration is the same.
>>
>> Is it possible I'm missing something relative to MTP requirements?
>> MTP resource is currently limited CallManagers and is within scope of
>> the MRGL for all devices, VM ports and gateways included.
>>
>> Any insight you might have would be appreciated.
>>
>> Thx,
>> Jon Pritchard
>>  
>>
>>
>>
>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
>> addressee and may contain information that is privileged and
>> confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended
>> recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient,
>> you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication
>> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message
>> and any attachments from your system.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>




More information about the cisco-voip mailing list