[cisco-voip] lightning/surge protection on analog ports for emergency poles

Lelio Fulgenzi lelio at uoguelph.ca
Wed Mar 29 11:10:07 EST 2006


ok thanks. the panamax site talks about a $5,000,000 coverage. we'd have to make sure what the fine print is and whether they need to 'certify' the install and attached devices. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Network Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Sanity First : Number of days with fewer than
50 messages in my inbox at the end of the day:         14
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Wes Sisk 
  To: Lelio Fulgenzi 
  Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 11:08 AM
  Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] lightning/surge protection on analog ports for emergency poles


  so long as it works you will be fine, but if it doesn't you will have a burnt pizza box.  I've seen several cases of this.  No way to know what the load was that toasted the box, but the high rate of occurrence leads me to believe it's a pretty low threshold.

  /Wes

  Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: 
    so if i buy one of those fancy lightning protectors i still won't be safe?

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
    Network Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
    (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
    Sanity First : Number of days with fewer than
    50 messages in my inbox at the end of the day:         14
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Wes Sisk 
      To: Lelio Fulgenzi 
      Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
      Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 10:08 AM
      Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] lightning/surge protection on analog ports for emergency poles


      The vg248 does not comply to Bellcore specs for off premise extensions.  i.e. it doesn't have overload protection.  the vic-2 and vic-4 FXS modules for routers do have proper overload protection to minimize damage.

      /Wes

      Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: 
        What have others done for protection against the elements on their analog ports? We have a few emergency poles on our campus that get hit by lightning a few times a year, and where we understand there will be some replacement parts necessary, we don't want this thing travelling down the wirepath to our vg248 and blowing that thing up.

        --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.     Network Analyst (CCS)
        University of Guelph     Guelph, Ontario     N1G 2W1
        (519) 824-4120 x56354     (519) 767-1060 FAX 
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
        Sanity First : Number of days with less than
        50 messages in my inbox at the end of the day:          21
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20060329/79f0ad1d/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list