[cisco-voip] dial-peers and more specific vs less specific matching

Ted Nugent tednugent69 at yahoo.com
Sun Feb 11 22:17:20 EST 2007


Ahhh... ok... sorry been a long weekend.. :-)
Well in this case I would probably use voice
translation rules. 

voice translation-rule 5500
 rule 1 reject /919005655555/
!
voice translation-profile block
 translate called 5500
!
dial-peer voice 976001901 pots
 corlist outgoing call-toll-fraud
 translation-profile outgoing block
 huntstop
 destination-pattern 919005655555



 
--- Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:

> But I still don't see how to block them for the
> other extensions.....I would thinking blocking
> specific outbounding area codes is a regular thing.
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Ted Nugent 
>   To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
>   Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 9:34 PM
>   Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] dial-peers and more
> specific vs less specific matching
> 
> 
>   Your 919005655555 DP is assigned to your
>   call-toll-fraud COR List so you'd need to assigned
>   that cor list to the DN... You mentioned it the
> other
>   way around before??
> 
>   call-manager-fallback
>     cor incoming call-toll-fraud 1 3000
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   --- Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> 
>   > Well, I'm basically looking for an easy way to
>   > blocking calling to specific numbers, for
> example,
>   > 900 numbers. But not only do I want to block
> them, I
>   > want to be able to assign them to another CoR so
>   > that while they are blocked for the most people,
> I
>   > can assign the CoR to others. It has to be a
>   > scalable solution though, since we may want to
>   > prevent access to other specific area codes but
>   > assign them to others.
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   >   From: Ted Nugent 
>   >   To: Lelio Fulgenzi ;
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
>   >   Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 11:12 AM
>   >   Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] dial-peers and more
>   > specific vs less specific matching
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   That is the expected behavior, I try to think
> of
>   > it as
>   >   PT/CSS, the call_long_dist COR does not have
>   > visibilty
>   >   to the 976001901 DP because its in a different
>   > COR, it
>   >   can only see the DP in its COR list. I'm not
> 100%
>   >   certain what your trying to accomplish however
> if
>   > you
>   >   do not assign COR to a dailpeer it will be
> visible
>   > by
>   >   all COR lists, sorta like putting it in the
> null
>   > PT.
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >   --- Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>   > 
>   >   > Trying to get my head around these
> dial-peers,
>   > and
>   >   > just when I thought I knew what I was
> doing....
>   >   > 
>   >   > I created a few dial-peers, some more
> specific
>   > than
>   >   > others, in the hopes that I could
> selectively
>   > route
>   >   > calls based on the CoR list assigned. We do
>   >   > something similar in CallManager and I was
>   > hoping to
>   >   > emulate things as much as possible.
>   >   > 
>   >   > A simple example (pardon spelling errors):
>   >   > 
>   >   > dial-peer cor custom
>   >   >     name long_dist
>   >   >     name toll_fraud
>   >   > 
>   >   > dial-peer cor list call_long_dist
>   >   >     member long_dist
>   >   > 
>   >   > dial-peer cor list call_toll_fraud
>   >   >     member long_dist
>   >   >     member toll_fraud
>   >   > 
>   >   > dial-peer voice 91901 pots
>   >   >  corlist outgoing call_long_dist
>   >   >  destination-pattern 91..........
>   >   >  port 3/0:23
>   >   >  forward-digits 11
>   >   > 
>   >   > dial-peer voice 976001901 pots
>   >   >  corlist outgoing call_toll_fraud
>   >   >  huntstop
>   >   >  destination-pattern 919005655555
>   >   >  port 3/0:23
>   >   >  forward-digits 11
>   >   > 
>   >   > phones with an incoming dialpeer of
>   > call_long_dist
>   >   > can still call this 1900 number, because
> it's
>   >   > matching the 91.......... dial-peer.
>   >   > 
>   >   > is that the way things are supposed to work?
>   > even if
>   >   > there is a more specific dial-peer (that
> doesn't
>   >   > match it's cor list), it will use a less
>   > specific
>   >   > dial-peer that does match?
>   >   > 
>   >   > that seems odd to me.
>   >   > 
>   >   >
>   >  
>   >
>  
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   >   > Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>   >   > Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph
> *
>   >   > Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
>   >   > (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX
> (JNHN)
>   >   >
>   >  
>   >
>  
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>   >   > 
>   >   > ...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...
>   >   > >
>   > _______________________________________________
>   >   > cisco-voip mailing list
>   >   > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>   >   >
>   >
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>   >   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   >    
>   >  
>   >
>  
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
>   >   Now that's room service!  Choose from over
> 150,000
>   > hotels
>   >   in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to
> find
>   > your fit.
>   >  
> http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
>   > >
> _______________________________________________
>   > cisco-voip mailing list
>   > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>   >
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>   > 
> 
> 
> 
>    
>  
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
>   Have a burning question?  
>   Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from
> real people who know.
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. 
Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list