[cisco-voip] dial-peers and more specific vs less specific matching
Lelio Fulgenzi
lelio at uoguelph.ca
Mon Feb 12 08:46:09 EST 2007
Thanks Ted....that's the idea I got after reading your post. Glad to see I'm on the right track.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...there's no such thing as a bad timbit...
----- Original Message -----
From: Ted Nugent
To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] dial-peers and more specific vs less specific matching
Yep, I personally like to make things a bit more
granular to give it more of a PT/CSS feel, works
better for me. I'd probably go this route, might have
fat fingered something but I think you'll get the idea
voice translation-rule 900
rule 1 reject /^91900/
!
voice translation-profile block
translate called 900
!
dial-peer cor custom
name long-dist
name toll-fraud
dial-peer cor list call-long-dist
member long-dist
!
dial-peer cor list call-toll-fraud
member toll-fraud
!
dial-peer cor list Unrestricted-Users
member long-dist
!
dial-peer cor list Restricted-Users
member long-dist
member toll-fraud
!
dial-peer voice 91901 pots
corlist outgoing call-long-dist
destination-pattern 91[2-9]..[2-9]......
port 3/0:23
forward-digits 11
dial-peer voice 1900 pots
corlist outgoing call-toll-fraud
translation-profile outgoing block
huntstop
destination-pattern 91900.......
call-manager-fallback
cor incoming Restricted-Users 1 3000 <-900s blocked
cor incoming Unrestricted-Users 1 3000 <-900s
allowed
--- Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> Ok then, so basically, I create a dial-peer that
> allows all long distance dialing, and then create
> dial-peers that block the area codes I want to block
> and then make sure that those dial-peers match the
> same CoR as the phones I want to prevent dialing
> those area codes. For everyone else, I make sure
> their CoR is a subset of the dial-peer cor so they
> do not match and therefor by pass the blocking
> dial-peer.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ted Nugent
> To: Lelio Fulgenzi ; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 10:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] dial-peers and more
> specific vs less specific matching
>
>
> Ahhh... ok... sorry been a long weekend.. :-)
> Well in this case I would probably use voice
> translation rules.
>
> voice translation-rule 5500
> rule 1 reject /919005655555/
> !
> voice translation-profile block
> translate called 5500
> !
> dial-peer voice 976001901 pots
> corlist outgoing call-toll-fraud
> translation-profile outgoing block
> huntstop
> destination-pattern 919005655555
>
>
>
>
> --- Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>
> > But I still don't see how to block them for the
> > other extensions.....I would thinking blocking
> > specific outbounding area codes is a regular
> thing.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Ted Nugent
> > To: Lelio Fulgenzi ;
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 9:34 PM
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] dial-peers and more
> > specific vs less specific matching
> >
> >
> > Your 919005655555 DP is assigned to your
> > call-toll-fraud COR List so you'd need to
> assigned
> > that cor list to the DN... You mentioned it
> the
> > other
> > way around before??
> >
> > call-manager-fallback
> > cor incoming call-toll-fraud 1 3000
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> >
> > > Well, I'm basically looking for an easy way
> to
> > > blocking calling to specific numbers, for
> > example,
> > > 900 numbers. But not only do I want to block
> > them, I
> > > want to be able to assign them to another
> CoR so
> > > that while they are blocked for the most
> people,
> > I
> > > can assign the CoR to others. It has to be a
> > > scalable solution though, since we may want
> to
> > > prevent access to other specific area codes
> but
> > > assign them to others.
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Ted Nugent
> > > To: Lelio Fulgenzi ;
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > > Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 11:12 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] dial-peers and
> more
> > > specific vs less specific matching
> > >
> > >
> > > That is the expected behavior, I try to
> think
> > of
> > > it as
> > > PT/CSS, the call_long_dist COR does not
> have
> > > visibilty
> > > to the 976001901 DP because its in a
> different
> > > COR, it
> > > can only see the DP in its COR list. I'm
> not
> > 100%
> > > certain what your trying to accomplish
> however
> > if
> > > you
> > > do not assign COR to a dailpeer it will be
> > visible
> > > by
> > > all COR lists, sorta like putting it in
> the
> > null
> > > PT.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Trying to get my head around these
> > dial-peers,
> > > and
> > > > just when I thought I knew what I was
> > doing....
> > > >
> > > > I created a few dial-peers, some more
> > specific
> > > than
> > > > others, in the hopes that I could
> > selectively
> > > route
> > > > calls based on the CoR list assigned. We
> do
> > > > something similar in CallManager and I
> was
> > > hoping to
> > > > emulate things as much as possible.
> > > >
> > > > A simple example (pardon spelling
> errors):
> > > >
> > > > dial-peer cor custom
> > > > name long_dist
> > > > name toll_fraud
> > > >
> > > > dial-peer cor list call_long_dist
> > > > member long_dist
> > > >
> > > > dial-peer cor list call_toll_fraud
> > > > member long_dist
> > > > member toll_fraud
> > > >
> > > > dial-peer voice 91901 pots
> > > > corlist outgoing call_long_dist
> > > > destination-pattern 91..........
> > > > port 3/0:23
> > > > forward-digits 11
> > > >
> > > > dial-peer voice 976001901 pots
> > > > corlist outgoing call_toll_fraud
> > > > huntstop
> > > > destination-pattern 919005655555
> > > > port 3/0:23
> > > > forward-digits 11
> > > >
> > > > phones with an incoming dialpeer of
> > > call_long_dist
> > > > can still call this 1900 number, because
> > it's
> > > > matching the 91.......... dial-peer.
> > > >
> > > > is that the way things are supposed to
> work?
> > > even if
> > > > there is a more specific dial-peer (that
> > doesn't
> > > > match it's cor list), it will use a less
> > > specific
> > > > dial-peer that does match?
> > > >
> > > > that seems odd to me.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>
=== message truncated ===>
_______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
It's here! Your new message!
Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070212/d65ee95b/attachment.html
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list