[cisco-voip] Drive Mirroring

Matt Slaga (US) Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com
Fri Feb 16 09:23:56 EST 2007


Most of this is due to processor time.  HP has always been way ahead of
the curve compared to IBM with offloading most processor requirements
onto the RAID card.  Another reason I prefer compaq servers over big
blue.

 

 

 

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
CarlosOrtiz at bayviewfinancial.com
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 9:13 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Drive Mirroring

 


After working with the HP MCS servers and IBM MCS servers we have found
a HUGE difference in rebuild time for mirrored drives.    The HP's
usually rebuild in about 20-30 mins.  The IBM's take about 5 hrs.  Is
there anything that can be done to speed up the IBM process? Are there
any known issues? 

Carlos



-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070216/b43fcf4a/attachment.html 


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list