[cisco-voip] AAR & Attendant Console

[Kris Seraphine]

Could you front the pilot point with a dummy CTI port?  Set a CTI port to
cfwdAll to your pilot point and configure the AAR Group and ext mask on the
CTI port line.  I think that would work but could complicate your dialplan a
bit.

Another option might be to have a translation pattern that matches the pilot
point DN in a lower-priority partition in the callers CSS.  If the call to
the pilot point DN was rejected due to location bandwidth you might be able
to make CM route  the call using the translation pattern by modifying a
system parameter (there are a few that deal with this but I don't remember
the parameters off the top of my head).  You could use the translation
pattern to replace the pilot DN with the DID.

On 2/19/07, Ruttman, Peter G. <PRuttman at foley.com> wrote:
>
>  We have a centralized Callmanager with offices throughout the U.S.  We
> have a RP that acts as a 3-digit shortcut from each office to every other
> office.  The RP forwards the call over the PSTN to the other office.  We
> would like to convert these numbers to use the internal numbers and use the
> WAN.  The thing I am trying to understand is how to invoke AAR if there
> isn't enough bandwidth when making the call.  Our main number is built on an
> AC pilot point.  On the AC pilot point, I can't configure the external phone
> number mask so that the call will reroute.  It seems that AC isn't currently
> compatible with AAR>
>
> How have others managed to get AAR to work through the WAN to AC Pilot
> points?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Pete Ruttman
>
> The preceding email message may be confidential or protected by the
> attorney-client privilege. It is not intended for transmission to, or
> receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this message in
> error, please (i) do not read it, (ii) reply to the sender that you received
> the message in error, and (iii) erase or destroy the message. Legal advice
> contained in the preceding message is solely for the benefit of the Foley &
> Lardner LLP client(s) represented by the Firm in the particular matter that
> is the subject of this message, and may not be relied upon by any other
> party.
>
>
> Internal Revenue Service regulations require that certain types of written
> advice include a disclaimer. To the extent the preceding message contains
> advice relating to a Federal tax issue, unless expressly stated otherwise
> the advice is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by
> the recipient or any other taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding Federal tax
> penalties, and was not written to support the promotion or marketing of any
> transaction or matter discussed herein.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>


-- 
kris seraphine
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070220/04ec2898/attachment.html