[cisco-voip] Cisco CRS upgrade question

[Jonathan Charles]

Someone mentioned that if you use the same IP for the server, that the old
CAD will tell you it needs to upgrade... but I have never seen it...



Jonathan

On 2/23/07, Jerri Robbins <jrobbins at mercurypay.com> wrote:
>
>  Not a citric environment.  I like the idea of giving the users admin
> rights to the Cisco directory as long as my sys admin agrees.  Otherwise, we
> can push it out via SMS to install as admin.  We did that with the previous
> version.  Just trying to figure an easier way since it is already installed
> and would only have to pull the new version from the CRS server.
>
>
>
> *Jerri*
>
> *From:* Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll at wesd.org]
> *Sent:* Friday, February 23, 2007 8:54 AM
> *To:* Jonathan Charles; Jason Aarons (US)
> *Cc:* Jerri Robbins; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* RE: [cisco-voip] Cisco CRS upgrade question
>
>
>
> I don't know if you have a citrix environment but you could use that as an
> alternative.  You don't get all the features, but you would not have to give
> them rights on the local machines.
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Charles
> *Sent:* Friday, February 23, 2007 7:12 AM
> *To:* Jason Aarons (US)
> *Cc:* Jerri Robbins; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco CRS upgrade question
>
>
>
> There was some talk about publishing CAD as an MSI that you could give
> rights to install... Also, you may want to adjust group policy to give the
> users admin rights to the C:\program files\cisco directory...
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On 2/23/07, *Jason Aarons (US)* <jason.aarons at us.didata.com> wrote:
>
> Having CAD users not be Local Administrator is unsupported by Cisco in all
> current versions. It's in the manual. It creates problems such as failover
> in a HA cluster won't work properly. It's problems you usually can't see.
>
>
>
> Cisco is working on a future CAD that requires fewer permissions than
> root/Administrator! Trust me I complained about the permission issue.
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net on behalf of Jerri Robbins
> *Sent:* Fri 2/23/2007 7:17 AM
> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Cisco CRS upgrade question
>
> Has anyone upgraded to the new UCCX version yet?  How did you handle the
> CAD upgrade that goes with it?  Our end users are users only, not power
> users or local admins.  With over 200 machines to update, I wonder a good
> way to do it.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Jerri
>    ------------------------------
>
> *Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you
> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and
> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you. *
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20070223/0e714718/attachment.html