[cisco-voip] Fax Servers

[embeleco]

CCM4.2(3) already support T.38 on MGCP and it works very well.




On 2/28/07, Voll, Scott <Scott.Voll at wesd.org> wrote:
> Does it do an OCR for user name?  How does it work if I have a Fax
> number with many people using it?
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons
> (US)
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 9:47 AM
> To: ciscovoip
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
>
>
>
> It does a LDAP lookup on any attribute you want. Can also be closest
> match. So if my attribute ipPhone is 33604 (five digit extension) and a
> fax comes in for 704-943-3604 you can setup closest match rule. You
> could also dump faxes to a printer for unknowns, etc.
>
>
>
> In practice we match AD attribute telephoneNumber.
>
>
>
> XMedius is really a great product.
>
>
>
> CVP, VoiceXML, T38 a lot of stuff doesn't work with MGCraP. However,
> Calling Party Name does and I understand T38 for MGCP is either just
> released or under development.
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 12:30 PM
> To: Linsemier, Matthew; ciscovoip
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
>
>
>
> How does the fax get to the right persons inbox?
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Linsemier, Matthew [mailto:MLinsemier at apcapital.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:20 AM
> To: Voll, Scott; ciscovoip
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
>
>
>
> I have implemented XMediusFax and from my opinion it to run circles
> around the fax services built into Cisco Unity.  There are small
> business and enterprise models.  A 4-port version of the small business
> model goes for around $6100 which supports unlimited mailboxes and
> clients.  Any number of ports can be configured as inbound or outbound,
> but not both.  The only caveat that we have run into (and it's the same
> with all faxing solutions) is that there is only support for H.323.
> MGCP is not supported and according to the Interstar tech support
> engineers, this is a Cisco issue and has been in their court to address
> (T.38 faxing) for about 2 years.
>
>
>
> -Matt
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 1:58 PM
> To: ciscovoip
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
>
>
>
> What kind of price range am I look at for a Fax server that ties in with
> CM?  what are the best out there.  I have big xerox's that can do
> scanning so I would like to tie it all together.
>
>
>
> Can I use Unity as a fax server?  How does that work?
>
>
>
> Scott
>
> ________________________________
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
>
> This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
> protected by one or more legal privileges. It is intended solely for the
> use of the addressee identified above. If you are not the intended
> recipient, any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this
> communication is UNAUTHORIZED.. Neither this information block, the
> typed name of the sender, nor anything else in this message is intended
> to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to the
> contrary is included in this message. If you have received this
> communication in error, please immediately contact me and delete this
> communication from your computer. Thank you.
>
> ________________________________
>
> ________________________________
>
> Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
> you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
> error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is
> strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
> message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
>
>