[cisco-voip] Fax Servers

[Jason Aarons (US)]

Our local Cisco engineers (sales) seems to push Linux 5.x, they have
told end users don't go to 4.2 as there is no 5.x upgrade path.  They
still say this today...I'm more interested in Win2K3 then no root
Linux...(give me root and it's another story)...

-----Original Message-----
From: embeleco [mailto:embeleco at gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 2:24 PM
To: Voll, Scott; Jason Aarons (US); ciscovoip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers

CCM4.2(3) already support T.38 on MGCP and it works very well.




On 2/28/07, Voll, Scott <Scott.Voll at wesd.org> wrote:
> Does it do an OCR for user name?  How does it work if I have a Fax
> number with many people using it?
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons
> (US)
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 9:47 AM
> To: ciscovoip
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
>
>
>
> It does a LDAP lookup on any attribute you want. Can also be closest
> match. So if my attribute ipPhone is 33604 (five digit extension) and
a
> fax comes in for 704-943-3604 you can setup closest match rule. You
> could also dump faxes to a printer for unknowns, etc.
>
>
>
> In practice we match AD attribute telephoneNumber.
>
>
>
> XMedius is really a great product.
>
>
>
> CVP, VoiceXML, T38 a lot of stuff doesn't work with MGCraP. However,
> Calling Party Name does and I understand T38 for MGCP is either just
> released or under development.
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 12:30 PM
> To: Linsemier, Matthew; ciscovoip
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
>
>
>
> How does the fax get to the right persons inbox?
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Linsemier, Matthew [mailto:MLinsemier at apcapital.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:20 AM
> To: Voll, Scott; ciscovoip
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
>
>
>
> I have implemented XMediusFax and from my opinion it to run circles
> around the fax services built into Cisco Unity.  There are small
> business and enterprise models.  A 4-port version of the small
business
> model goes for around $6100 which supports unlimited mailboxes and
> clients.  Any number of ports can be configured as inbound or
outbound,
> but not both.  The only caveat that we have run into (and it's the
same
> with all faxing solutions) is that there is only support for H.323.
> MGCP is not supported and according to the Interstar tech support
> engineers, this is a Cisco issue and has been in their court to
address
> (T.38 faxing) for about 2 years.
>
>
>
> -Matt
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 1:58 PM
> To: ciscovoip
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Fax Servers
>
>
>
> What kind of price range am I look at for a Fax server that ties in
with
> CM?  what are the best out there.  I have big xerox's that can do
> scanning so I would like to tie it all together.
>
>
>
> Can I use Unity as a fax server?  How does that work?
>
>
>
> Scott
>
> ________________________________
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT
>
> This communication and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
> protected by one or more legal privileges. It is intended solely for
the
> use of the addressee identified above. If you are not the intended
> recipient, any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this
> communication is UNAUTHORIZED.. Neither this information block, the
> typed name of the sender, nor anything else in this message is
intended
> to constitute an electronic signature unless a specific statement to
the
> contrary is included in this message. If you have received this
> communication in error, please immediately contact me and delete this
> communication from your computer. Thank you.
>
> ________________________________
>
> ________________________________
>
> Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee,
> you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in
> error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents
is
> strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to
this
> message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.
>
>
-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.