[cisco-voip] Gatekeeper

Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com
Tue Apr 8 11:42:00 EDT 2008


You can indeed do HSRP but as I said before. Alternate Gatekeepers is a more Solid Redundancy Strategy than HSRP.

Jorge

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Christianno Marcenes
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 10:55 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Gatekeeper

Exactly, we are going to have 2 new GK's and the older one. But in the period of migration, 3 GKs have to talk.

And the 2 new GK's are going to work togheter (active and standy). I think to put HSRP between them? Is that correct?

On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila <jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com<mailto:jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com>> wrote:
The Fastest Way is to create remote Zones and Pass Traffic from one Zone into another. The More elegant way is to use Directory Gatekeepers as Chris Said. One piece of advice. With 400 Sites in the Zone I would recommend that you deploy and Alternate Gatekeeper, not just the one gatekeeper.


Jorge Rodríguez Aguila
CCNA,CCVP,CRMCS
Senior Voice/Data Network Consultant
Netxar Technologies
jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com<mailto:jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com>
Office 787-765-0058
PCS 787-688-8530



-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>] On Behalf Of Christopher M. Bomba
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 10:00 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Cc: christiannomarcenes at gmail.com<mailto:christiannomarcenes at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Gatekeeper

You can send the calls between the gatekeepers by configuring remote zones.  Also you can configure a third gatekeepers that acts as a directory gatekeeper and anything the FR GK doesn't know about send to DirGK and then the same for the MPLS GK.  That way the DirGK is the one who handles all the Location Requests.

Chris



From: "Christianno Marcenes" <christiannomarcenes at gmail.com<mailto:christiannomarcenes at gmail.com>>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Gatekeeper
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
       <e1bba7c70804080318v6b9893d9nbde07b5b979cf27d at mail.gmail.com<mailto:e1bba7c70804080318v6b9893d9nbde07b5b979cf27d at mail.gmail.com>>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi,

I need some help.

I have a FR Network with 400 remote sites with one GK on the concentrator.

This customer is migrating to MPLS, so we are going do configure another GK
to the MPLS Sites. How to do FR Sites "talk" with MPLS Sites? The old GK
will talk with the new GK? How to do this?



Best Regards,

--
Christianno Marcenes

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



--
Christianno Marcenes
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080408/0c2eeb46/attachment.html 


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list