[cisco-voip] CUCM Location question

[Wes Sisk]

2104 is a safe place to land for now.  At the time of posting (20 Mar) 
2104 had been stable in deployments for at least 4 weeks with no major 
issues.

i believe you were looking at CSCsm95717.

/wes

Erick Bergquist wrote:
> Ah, thanks. We're going to do proactive method. Whats the latest 5.1.3
> ES you would go with?  I did some bug hunting yesterday and found a
> bug involving cdcc leaks that was fixed in 5.1.3 2107 but didn't jot
> down the id. It looks like 2104 is the latest on the download page.
>
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
>   
>> Cdcc = call dependent call control, a logical pointer to a call in CM's
>> memory.
>>
>>  These types of issues are very interesting and challenging.  Most effective
>> approach so far has been:
>>  1. setup a trace archive server archive CM SDI and SDL and CTI SDI and SDL
>> traces.
>>  2. identify a period of low (no) utilization on the system, typically
>> midnight/early AM, call the first low period T1
>>  3. confirm counter value V1 at T1.
>>  4. wait for next low period T2. check counter.  If a leak has occurred (V2
>>     
>>> V1 with no obvious system activity)
>>>       
>>  collect all traces from T1 to T2.  Provide traces, T1, T2, V1, V2, to TAC.
>>
>>  TAC will run a series of scripts on these traces, especially CM SDL traces,
>> to identify potential leaks.
>>
>>  It is certainly non-trivial to collect the diagnostics let alone perform
>> the analysis.  If proactive upgrade is an option it is highly recommended.
>> Something late in the 5.1.3branch on 6.1 would be a much better starting
>> point.
>>
>>  /Wes
>>
>>
>>
>>  Erick Bergquist wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Ok, it appears to have a bandwidth leak. A reboot has cleared the
>>> issue and the bandwidth values in RTMT are good a day later.  What
>>> does cdcc stand for?  I'm searching bug toolkit for bugs. This is on a
>>> 5.1.1-3126-1 version cucm BTW.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> No, locations CAC does not include signaling.  sounds like a bandwidth
>>>>         
>> leak
>>     
>>>> has occurred. these are typically associated with cdcc leak as well.
>>>>         
>> /wes
>>     
>>>>  Erick Bergquist wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Does signalling traffic count toward location bandwidth?
>>>>>
>>>>> Have a setup where a site has audio bandwidth set to 1544, and when
>>>>> there are no phone calls active, it is using 39 bandwidth for
>>>>> CallsInProgress object under Locations in RTMT.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>