[cisco-voip] Alerting Name being passed to PBX

[William Roy]

Answers inline...

So thats a call from CCM to NEC...

   Yes that was a call from CCM to NEC

Where do you have the calling names filled in on the phone config?
Do you have both Display and Alerting name set on the line? (normal and ASCII?)

    Yes have Display and Alerting set for both normal and Ascii

Calling party settings on the gateway itself?

     Calling Party Presentation - Allowed
     Calling Party Selection - Originator
     Called party IE Number - Unknown
     Calling party IE number - Unknown
    Called Numbering Plan - Cisco CallManager
    Calling Numbering Plan - Cisco CallManager

    Display IE Delivery is greyed out and can not be set

Route patterns to the NEC set to offnet or on net?

    Currently set to onnet

 You dont have any route patterns / translation patterns in there doing any restriction on the calling opname?

     Nope

GW is definitely MGCP and set to Q.SIG?

     Yes



On 8/6/08, William Roy <William.Roy at l7.com.au<mailto:William.Roy at l7.com.au>> wrote:
No we do not get connected name once the call is connected only calling number. This is a debug from an IP phone to a NEC phone


ho-vgate-1#
ho-vgate-1#
*Aug  6 08:21:39.106: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x001E
        Sending Complete
        Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3
                Standard = CCITT
                Transfer Capability = Speech
                Transfer Mode = Circuit
                Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
        Channel ID i = 0xA9839F
                Exclusive, Channel 31
        Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '6005'
                Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
        Called Party Number i = 0x80, '4723'
                Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
*Aug  6 08:21:39.166: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- CALL_PROC pd = 8  callref = 0x801E
        Channel ID i = 0xA9839F
                Exclusive, Channel 31
*Aug  6 08:21:39.170: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- ALERTING pd = 8  callref = 0x801E
*Aug  6 08:21:43.158: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- CONNECT pd = 8  callref = 0x801E
        Progress Ind i = 0x8082 - Destination address is non-ISDN
        Connected Number i = 0x0081, '4723'
*Aug  6 08:21:43.162: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> CONNECT_ACK pd = 8  callref = 0x001E

________________________________
From: smithsonianwa at gmail.com<mailto:smithsonianwa at gmail.com> [smithsonianwa at gmail.com<mailto:smithsonianwa at gmail.com>] On Behalf Of Tim Smith [thsglobal at gmail.com<mailto:thsglobal at gmail.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, 6 August 2008 3:54 PM
To: William Roy
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Alerting Name being passed to PBX


Hi Wil,

What do you see with a debug isdn q931?

Do you get connected name once the call is established?

Cheers,

Tim.





On 8/6/08, William Roy <William.Roy at l7.com.au<mailto:William.Roy at l7.com.au>> wrote:
I have NEC IPX2400 PBX connected to a ISR2851 via an QSIG E1 link. The ISR is setup as an MGCP gateway with a CUCM 6.1 cluster. I am not seeing Calling name being passed either from an NEC phone to a Cisco IP phone or visa versa. Is there any debug I can run on the ISR to see if the cisco ip phone is sending Calling name?

regards
Wil

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080807/7459b1b8/attachment.html>