[cisco-voip] CCM/CU vs CCME/CUE

Voice Noob voicenoob at gmail.com
Mon Aug 25 20:01:39 EDT 2008


 In the end you need to decide what type of system you want to manager and
which system gives you the features that you need. True there are some
things that CME can do, such as paging, that CCM cannot do without a third
party system. They are two completely different systems aimed at two
completely different markets. You need to decide if you want to manage
multiple configurations or a central configuration. Also I would take a hard
look at not doing CUE at each location. You can do central voicemail using
Unity or Unity connection and still have all of the CME sites go back to the
same voicemail system.


On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 6:49 PM, John Ramz <sforcejr at yahoo.com> wrote:

> WHat do you mean by dial plan?
> WHat else am I going to loose besides paging?
>
> I appreciate as much as info as you can provide. Is there any link to a
> cisco document that compares the 2 products ?
>
> Thanks and I appreciate your time
>
> John
>
>
>
>
> --- On Mon, 8/25/08, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CCM/CU vs CCME/CUE
> > To: sforcejr at yahoo.com
> > Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 5:30 PM
>  > Centrallized management / dial plan
> >
> > but another question is what am I going to loose... eg.
> > paging ;-(
> >
> > might be a bit costly to go full blown but in the same
> > case, you have a ton
> > of flexablity to expand.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:16 PM, John Ramz
> > <sforcejr at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In this company there is already one site with Cisco
> > Call Manager
> > > Express/Cisco Unity Express. They have a 2851 router
> > (max 96 users).
> > >
> > > We are getting quotes for CCM and CU to replace
> > CCME/CUE and extend VOIP to
> > > the rest of the locations(3). The price of the full
> > blown solution is very
> > > expensive. We also learned that the Licenses on the
> > phones do not transfer
> > > from CCME to CCM. I have been thinking if we should
> > just get CCME for the
> > > other locations and connect them all in a multisite
> > design.
> > >
> > > What would be the main disadvantages of doing this
> > opposed to going with a
> > > CCM/CU solution?
> > >
> > > What features are we losing if we decide to go that
> > route?
> > >
> > >
> > > Any ideas about mixing the two?
> > >
> > >
> > > Addt Info: Main location: 130 users, site A: 40 users,
> > Site B: 35 users,
> > > Site, C:45 users
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-voip mailing list
> > > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> > >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080825/d2bd5695/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list