[cisco-voip] CCM/CU vs CCME/CUE

Voice Noob voicenoob at gmail.com
Tue Aug 26 12:48:13 EDT 2008


The question was in regards to licensing and not how to configure it.

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Steve G <smgustafson at gmail.com> wrote:

> I thought a new way to program SRST is by actually programming CME to
> retain more features and funtionality.
>
>
> On 8/26/08, Voice Noob <voicenoob at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> You can NOT transfer CME license to CCM. When you purchase a  phone the
>> old way you purchased it with a license for the system you were connected
>> to. CME licenses transfer to SRST licenses. If you did get them to transfer
>> you got luck from Cisco because this is NOT the way that it works.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:01 PM, William Roy <William.Roy at l7.com.au>wrote:
>>
>>> In terms of licensing we have "transferred" CCME license to CCM. If you
>>> do go down the CCM path, ring the TAC and open a case with licensing and
>>> tell them you are upgrading from CCME to CCM, they will ask you to fill in a
>>> spreadsheet with the number of phone and types and they will cut you a DLU
>>> license for the new CCM platform.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Wil
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
>>> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of John Ramz
>>> Sent: Tuesday, 26 August 2008 6:17 AM
>>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> Subject: [cisco-voip] CCM/CU vs CCME/CUE
>>>
>>> In this company there is already one site with Cisco Call Manager
>>> Express/Cisco Unity Express. They have a 2851 router (max 96 users).
>>>
>>> We are getting quotes for CCM and CU to replace CCME/CUE and extend VOIP
>>> to the rest of the locations(3). The price of the full blown solution is
>>> very expensive. We also learned that the Licenses on the phones do not
>>> transfer from CCME to CCM. I have been thinking if we should just get CCME
>>> for the other locations and connect them all in a multisite design.
>>>
>>> What would be the main disadvantages of doing this opposed to going with
>>> a CCM/CU solution?
>>>
>>> What features are we losing if we decide to go that route?
>>>
>>>
>>> Any ideas about mixing the two?
>>>
>>>
>>> Addt Info: Main location: 130 users, site A: 40 users, Site B: 35 users,
>>> Site, C:45 users
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080826/8ce4da91/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list