[cisco-voip] SCCP features with VG248

[Greg Hinson]

I know that VG224's used to be better than the 248 for reasons of T.38 faxing. Since 248's are configured for Skinny, and Skinny to H.323/SIP T.38 wasn't handled very gracefully in older versions of callmanager, a VG224 was preferred because it could be configured for MGCP or H.323.
 
-Greg
 
 



From: lelio at uoguelph.caTo: aman.chugh at gmail.comDate: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:50:11 -0400CC: cisco-voip at puck.nether.netSubject: Re: [cisco-voip] SCCP features with VG248



you can sell the VG224 on a few more things as well:

dual uplinks
routing participation
dial-peers
anything else that IOS gives you.
bulk load (v6 or higher i think)
 
 
Lelio--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ...seen on a Geek Squad patch cord: "While it is the same length, this 7' crossover cableis not regulation issue for most competitive Manhattan double dutch leagues.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Aman Chugh 
To: Lelio Fulgenzi 
Cc: Ed Leatherman ; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SCCP features with VG248

Thanks everyone for sharing this useful information. I seriously need to pursue my client to buy VG224 as It would require around 18 of these to support 400 extensions and some more rack space.
 
Aman 
On 8/28/08, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote: 


I don't think they are officially EOL'ed. I don't think they will be anytime soon. It's just that they are not directional. Of course, that may not be official either.
 
Lelio--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ...seen on a Geek Squad patch cord: "While it is the same length, this 7' crossover cableis not regulation issue for most competitive Manhattan double dutch leagues.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Ed Leatherman 
To: Lelio Fulgenzi 
Cc: Aman Chugh ; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SCCP features with VG248
 
someone have a link to that EOL announcement? last time I looked the only one there was for VG200.. I must have looked in the wrong place.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:


Unless they've already bought the VG248 you'll want to seriously consider the VG224. There was a point where the VG248 had more features but the VG224 is catching up if not already there and it is likely the more "directional" product. It is IOS based and any future feature building and development will likely be on this line. It is still competitively priced, i.e. you can buy a four pack of VG224s for less than two VG248s.
 
The biggest issue is density. You now need two RUs for every 48 ports.
 
Lelio--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ...seen on a Geek Squad patch cord: "While it is the same length, this 7' crossover cableis not regulation issue for most competitive Manhattan double dutch leagues.-- Ed LeathermanAssistant Director, Voice ServicesWest Virginia UniversityTelecommunications and Network Operations 
_________________________________________________________________
Get thousands of games on your PC, your mobile phone, and the web with Windows®.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/108588800/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080828/2ba5a9e9/attachment.html>