[cisco-voip] Mismatched CCM versions, side effects...

[Jonathan Charles]

Well, I am sure we are already experiencing that

They are on 4.5bSr4, should I bring them to SR12 first to fix the memory leak?



Jonatha

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
> No the blue screens would be the nonpaged pool memory leak you want to fix
> :)
> Just quirky call behavior for anything crossing nodes as CCM one one node
> may behave differently than CCM on another node due to missing bug fixes,
> etc.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Jul 17, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> When you say 'weird stuff'... do you mean blue screens?
> I just want to prepare myself for whatever calamity occurs...
>
>
> Jonathan
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>
> ES122 is newer than SR5b but as long as you end up on the same version you
> will be ok.  You can apply SR7 to all of them regardless of the current
> version (since all are already at some variant of 4.1.3) and as long as you
> remember wierd stuff can happen before they get there then you'll be ok.
> -Ryan
> On Jul 17, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> I ask, cuz my original plan was to apply sr5b to the Subscriber, then
> sr7 to the pub, then sr7 to the sub.... I figured it would be safest
> to patch the sub to the same ver
>
> Jonathan
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> So, es122 is newer than sr5b....
>
> Jonathan
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
> SR5b is based on ES106 with various fixes going up to ES115.
> The biggest fix between those two versions is  CSCsj37081 - CDP.sys causing
> nonpaged pool memory leak identified by Mdl tag.
> Unfortunately you need to be at SR7 to have the full fix for that.
> The general mismatched version warning I give is:
> Worst case, CCM crashes, repeatedly.
> Most likely case, calls fail between the nodes running mismatched versions.
> Best case, various wierd things happen you can't explain.
> In any case TAC won't touch the system.
> -Ryan
> On Jul 17, 2008, at 11:57 AM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> So, just curious as to what potential side effects could be in the
> following:
> Publisher CCM 4.1(3)Sr5b
> Subscriber: CCM 4.1(3)es122.1
> I am thinking really bad things, but I want the customer to understand
> how bad...  they are pushing back on patching.... I want rain of fire
> kind of stuff....
>
> Jonathan
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>