[cisco-voip] PRI NFAS

[James Buchanan]

Hello,

I know of no such change. If they are using NFAS, I would recommend
getting rid of it. The extra channel is not worth the loss of
flexibility in having multiple PRIs on redundant gateways or blades. 

Thanks,

James

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Aarons
(US)
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:59 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] PRI NFAS

Has there been any changes to allow NFAS with MGCP and be setup cia
CallManager? I thought NFAS required H323.

I have a site that has CMM blade setup with MGCP, but told me telco is
using NFAS. I am thinking they are confused and don't have NFAS.

-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip