[cisco-voip] Is anyone using Unity Connection 8.0.1?

[Matthew Saskin]

linux-based and perhaps more importantly, provides for high availability
over the WAN.

Matthew Saskin
msaskin at gmail.com
203-253-9571

July 18, 2010 - 1500m swim (in the hudson), 40k bike, 10k run
Please support the Leukemia & Lyphoma Society
http://pages.teamintraining.org/nyc/nyctri10/msaskin


On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Mark Holloway <mh at markholloway.com> wrote:

> UCCX 8 is now Linux based, correct?
>
>
>  On Mar 22, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Matthew Saskin wrote:
>
>  fwiw, I've got a large financial as a customer that is making a move
> (initially) to 8.0 for most production users with the environment then
> migrating to later versions end of year.  This is a necessity to get past
> some alternate platform EOS issues, but serves as a bit of an indicator that
> the general level of acceptance of .0 platforms has increased.  I've got a
> number of customers lined up to move to CUCM 8.0 and UCCX 8.0 once it's
> orderable as well.
>
> Matthew Saskin
> msaskin at gmail.com
> 203-253-9571
>
> July 18, 2010 - 1500m swim (in the hudson), 40k bike, 10k run
> Please support the Leukemia & Lyphoma Society
> http://pages.teamintraining.org/nyc/nyctri10/msaskin
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Tanner Ezell <tanner.ezell at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I think Cisco's level of QA has improved over the last couple years in
>> regards to releases. It seems like there are less and less problems.
>>
>> I vote you go for 8 for the reasons mentioned. Additionally, you'll
>> gain valuable insight you share with us :)
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
>> wrote:
>> > Go with v8. Let's face it, if there's bugs in v7.1(3), you'll likely to
>> hear
>> > "it's fixed in v8. ;)
>> >
>> > ---
>> > Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>> > Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
>> > (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
>> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> > Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
>> >                               - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Billie Brown III" <trip.brown at duke.edu>
>> > To: "Ed Leatherman" <ealeatherman at gmail.com>
>> > Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 12:12:42 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Is anyone using Unity Connection 8.0.1?
>> >
>> > Capacity is the big driver.  We will ultimately need about 25,000
>> > subscribers.  Unity connection Release 8.0 gives 20,000 subscribers and
>> 250
>> > ports per system.  We plan to have two clusters networked.  We would
>> need
>> > three clusters if we went 7.x.
>> >
>> > Also, integrated messaging does not reduce total ports and subscribers
>> like
>> > it does in the 7.x releases.  And non-IMAP Idle clients do not reduce
>> > subscribers.  In Release 8.0, a port is a port.  It matters not if the
>> > subscriber is integratede with Exchange.  This is per Cisco.  I admit
>> that I
>> > too have .0 reservations but it is somewhat compelling.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > -trip
>> >
>> >
>> > On 3/22/10 12:03 PM, "Ed Leatherman" <ealeatherman at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I've never had good luck with .0 releases myself, at least for call
>> > manager. Normally wait till the .1 release where possible.
>> >
>> > What kind of reason did Cisco give for suggesting version 8?
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Billie Brown III <trip.brown at duke.edu
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >> We are in the process of moving 15,000 Unity 4.2.1 subscribers and
>> >> callhandlers to Unity Connection with the help of Cisco.  We originally
>> >> decided upon Unity Connection 7.1.3 but Cisco is now recommending that
>> we
>> >> go
>> >> ahead with Unity Connection Release 8.0.1.  Is anyone using Release
>> 8.0.1
>> >> in
>> >> a large, active/active environment?  Should we go with the brand new
>> >> release
>> >> or stay with 7.x?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Trip Brown
>> >> Duke University
>> >> Office of Information Technology
>> >>
>> >> Durham, NC 27701
>> >> 919-668-9228
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> cisco-voip mailing list
>> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ed Leatherman
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
>> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cisco-voip mailing list
>> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Tanner Ezell
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100322/8982bc29/attachment.html>