[cisco-voip] configure VG224 with MGCP and/or SCCP

Lelio Fulgenzi lelio at uoguelph.ca
Tue Oct 9 11:17:13 EDT 2012


have the SIP configurations helped for alarm panels? 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil) 


----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Pedersen" <PedersenE at bennettjones.com> 
To: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com>, "Dennis Heim" <dennis.heim at wwt.com>, "abbas Wali" <abbaseo at gmail.com>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2012 11:11:21 AM 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] configure VG224 with MGCP and/or SCCP 




I wasn't able to get modem passthrough working with the VG224s on MGCP and our PRI gateways on SIP even though the SRND says it works. The NSE switchover never happened. I didn't have a lot of time to troubleshoot so I ended up switching the ports to SIP, which is a lot of config, but works great. 





From: Jason Aarons (AM) [mailto:jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com] 
Sent: 09 October 2012 9:07 AM 
To: Eric Pedersen; Heim, Dennis; abbas Wali; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] configure VG224 with MGCP and/or SCCP 



Correct me if wrong, but I understand a problem with VG224 SCCP is lack of standards based T.38. 



I’ve switched to SIP default for my VG224s. However SIP VG224 breaks shared lines between IP Phones and Analog Polycoms. 



I would pick VG224 SCCP over VG224 MGCP if SIP wasn’t a option. 





From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [ mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net ] On Behalf Of Eric Pedersen 
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 11:02 AM 
To: Heim, Dennis; abbas Wali; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] configure VG224 with MGCP and/or SCCP 





If I recall correctly, with SCCP you can only configure fax and modem settings globally and they apply to all ports, but you can configure per-port settings with MGCP. I don't know if that matters in your particular situation. 





From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [ mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net ] On Behalf Of Heim, Dennis 
Sent: 08 October 2012 11:55 AM 
To: abbas Wali; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] configure VG224 with MGCP and/or SCCP 



You can configure each port whatever you want it to be. To be honest ever since, IOS 15, SCCP is the no brainer. Back in the day SCCP sucked for modems, and faxes. In the last couple years I have not had any problems with it. The thing to keep in mind is the SCCP or MGCP will consume an SRST device license. 



Dennis Heim 

Sr. UC Engineer 

World Wide Technology 

Office: 314.212.1814 

Email: dennis.heim at wwt.com 

www.wwt.com 



From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [ mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net ] On Behalf Of abbas Wali 
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 1:37 PM 
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Subject: [cisco-voip] configure VG224 with MGCP and/or SCCP 



Hi all, 

simple question: 

need to configure a VG224 to support fax, modem and a PDQ (credit card machine). looked around, some says SCCP is best some says MGCP. can I configure both i.e. 12 ports with SCCP and 12 with MGCP. 

thanks in advance. 

Abbas 



itevomcid The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged subject matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication, e-mail communications may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized parties. If you do not wish us to communicate with you by e-mail, please notify us at your earliest convenience. In the absence of such notification, your consent is assumed. Should you choose to allow us to communicate by e-mail, we will not take any additional security measures (such as encryption) unless specifically requested. The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged
subject matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact
the sender and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication,
e-mail communications may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized
parties. If you do not wish us to communicate with you by e-mail, please
notify us at your earliest convenience. In the absence of such
notification, your consent is assumed. Should you choose to allow us to
communicate by e-mail, we will not take any additional security measures
(such as encryption) unless specifically requested. 
_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20121009/331344e1/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list