[f-nsp] Ibgp Routes.

Stephen J. Wilcox steve at telecomplete.co.uk
Tue Mar 7 05:48:13 EST 2006


Hi Armand,
 no, they just send the best ebgp routes to each other - therefore each router 
has a copy of the full routing table based on all the routes from its ebgp 
neighbors and the (best) routes from the ibgp neighbors.

If one of the transits fails then the other router will have all the best routes 
and will advertise them all to its ibgp neighbor. The convergence will take a 
couple of minutes if we assume thats going to be about 90000 routes.

Steve

On Tue, 7 Mar 2006, A.P. Krijgsman wrote:

> Dear Steven,
> 
> As you can see in the Summary, both routes have only one transit uplink.
> Each router only has one bgp session for external routes.
> Wouldn't that mean that they need to sent all eBGP routes to the iBGP 
> neighbor?
> Or does it match the routes from both routers?
> 
> I wonder what happens if one of our uplinks fails. Will I be able to sent 
> full transit over the iBGP session?
> 
> Regards,
> Armand
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve at telecomplete.co.uk>
> To: "A. Krijgsman - QCC" <a.krijgsman at quality-control-centre.net>
> Cc: <foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 11:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [f-nsp] Ibgp Routes.
> 
> 
> >
> > thats normal bgp behaviour
> >
> > ibgp does not send full routes unless you configure them to each be route
> > reflector clients.. they will only send the best external routes
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, A. Krijgsman - QCC wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> Does anyone has an explination for this?
> >> - Two routers in VRRP-E.
> >> - IBGP session between them.
> >>
> >> Why don't the IBGP peers sent eachother their entire received 
> >> full-transtit
> >> routes?
> >> Does not make sense to me :-(
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Armand
> >>
> >>
> >> Summary:
> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> RT1:
> >> SSH at ams-gs-rt1>show ip bgp summary
> >>   BGP4 Summary
> >>   Router ID: 195.144.2.2   Local AS Number : 35829
> >>   Confederation Identifier : not configured
> >>   Confederation Peers:
> >>   Maximum Number of Paths Supported for Load Sharing : 1
> >>   Number of Neighbors Configured : 2, UP: 2
> >>   Number of Routes Installed : 325556
> >>   Number of Routes Advertising to All Neighbors : 118348
> >>   Number of Attribute Entries Installed : 61441
> >>   Neighbor Address  AS#   State   Time     Rt:Accepted Filtered Sent
> >> ToSend
> >>   195.144.2.3       35829 ESTAB   3d 9h59m    143228   0        118347 0
> >>   217.170.9.129     24785 ESTAB   4d12h11m    182327   0        1      0
> >>
> >>
> >> RT2:
> >> SSH at ams-gs-rt2>show ip bgp summary
> >>   BGP4 Summary
> >>   Router ID: 84.233.188.98   Local AS Number : 35829
> >>   Confederation Identifier : not configured
> >>   Confederation Peers:
> >>   Maximum Number of Paths Supported for Load Sharing : 1
> >>   Number of Neighbors Configured : 2, UP: 2
> >>   Number of Routes Installed : 297731
> >>   Number of Routes Advertising to All Neighbors : 143226
> >>   Number of Attribute Entries Installed : 52427
> >>   Neighbor Address  AS#   State   Time     Rt:Accepted Filtered Sent
> >> ToSend
> >>   84.233.188.97     8928  ESTAB   7d 2h57m    179398   0        1      0
> >>   195.144.2.2       35829 ESTAB   3d 9h58m    118332   0        143225 0
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> foundry-nsp mailing list
> >> foundry-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
> >>
> >
> > 
> 
> 
> 




More information about the foundry-nsp mailing list