<style type="text/css">
<!--
TT { font-size: 10pt}
-->
</style>
<TT>
That's true.<BR>
But If we are running scheduled auto-configuration generator on <BR>
management station ,that is a big issue. <BR>
<BR>
Regards,<BR>
Han<BR>
--- Original Message ---<BR>
From: "Ben Buxton" B.Buxton@Planettechnologies.nl<BR>
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net<BR>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:30:09 +0100<BR>
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] vrrp on fxp0<BR>
<BR>
><BR>
>In this situation I would say that if you lose a RE, telnetting to a<BR>
>different IP address from the management station is the least of<BR>
>your concerns.<BR>
><BR>
>BB<BR>
><BR>
>><BR>
We use a management network via fxp0 with other devices.<BR>
>><BR>
I know what you mean, <BR>
>><BR>
But we don't want to change the router ip address on <BR>
>><BR>
management server to telnet when RE changed case.<BR>
>><BR>
If we run vrrp on fxp0 with interface tracking, we can access <BR>
>><BR>
always router without ip address change.<BR>
>><BR>
Of course we have to use predefined group re0 and re1 at that case.<BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
Thanks<BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
Han<BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
>><BR>
From: Guy Davies [mailto:Guy.Davies@telindus.co.uk]<BR>
>><BR>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 7:39 PM<BR>
>><BR>
To: 'Hangu Jeong'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net<BR>
>><BR>
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] vrrp on fxp0<BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<BR>
>><BR>
Hash: SHA1<BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
Why would you want to run vrrp on fxp0? VRRP gives you a degree of<BR>
>><BR>
resilience to a default route. Since you can't route traffic <BR>
>><BR>
via fxp0,<BR>
>><BR>
this makes no sense at all.<BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
The thing to do for the 2 REs is to have an IP address for <BR>
>><BR>
each. Both REs<BR>
>><BR>
are live even though one is master and the other slave so you <BR>
>><BR>
can log into<BR>
>><BR>
both of them independently. If you use the predefined groups <BR>
>><BR>
re0 and re1,<BR>
>><BR>
you can have an identical config on both REs which configures the IP<BR>
>><BR>
address of fxp0 depending upon which RE slot the config is <BR>
>><BR>
being installed<BR>
>><BR>
on.<BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
Regards,<BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
Guy<BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
From: Hangu Jeong [mailto:hgjeong@icraft21.com]<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:32 AM<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
Subject: [j-nsp] vrrp on fxp0<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
Hi all,<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
We have a M20 with 2 RE. <BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
Anybody tried to run vrrp on fxp0 for router management ?<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
Pls let me know, if anyabody have experience for that. <BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
Thaniks in advance<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
Han<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
<a href='http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp' target='_blank'>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp</a><BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<BR>
>><BR>
Version: PGP 8.0<BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
iQA/AwUBPi501Y3dwu/Ss2PCEQKD6QCdEy20aYHGz26fiwu0MI61o+60ccIAnRTn<BR>
>><BR>
WKY/cYap3Mic5JT1rruXyRaT<BR>
>><BR>
=OJaz<BR>
>><BR>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
This e-mail is private and may be confidential and is for the intended<BR>
>><BR>
recipient only. If misdirected, please notify us by <BR>
>><BR>
telephone and confirm<BR>
>><BR>
that it has been deleted from your system and any copies <BR>
>><BR>
destroyed. If you<BR>
>><BR>
are not the intended recipient you are strictly prohibited from using,<BR>
>><BR>
printing, copying, distributing or disseminating this e-mail or any<BR>
>><BR>
information contained in it. We use reasonable endeavors to <BR>
>><BR>
virus scan all<BR>
>><BR>
e-mails leaving the Company but no warranty is given that <BR>
>><BR>
this e-mail and<BR>
>><BR>
any attachments are virus free. You should undertake your own virus<BR>
>><BR>
checking. The right to monitor e-mail communications through <BR>
>><BR>
our network<BR>
>><BR>
is reserved by us. <BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
>><BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
>><BR>
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net<BR>
>><BR>
<a href='http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp' target='_blank'>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp</a><BR>
>><BR>
<BR>
><BR>
>_______________________________________________<BR>
>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net<BR>
><a href='http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp' target='_blank'>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp</a><BR>
</TT>
<br>