<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2655.35">
<TITLE>RE: [j-nsp] ORF</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Hi Hannes,</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Thanks for your reply. BTW, do you know any issues if a Juniper PE is talking to a PE (of other vendors) with BGP-ORF enabled? Or the other end PE must disable BGP-ORF to have IBGP come up?</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Thanks</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>David Xu</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Hannes Gredler [<A HREF="mailto:hannes@juniper.net">mailto:hannes@juniper.net</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:52 PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: Xu, David [CAR:X067:EXCH]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: Re: [j-nsp] ORF</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 11:08:48AM -0500, David Xu wrote:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>| ORF</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>| </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>| Hi There,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>| </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>| Anybody knows if Juniper support BGP ORF defined in</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>| * IETF RFC draft draft-chen-bgp-prefix-orf-01.txt</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>| * IETF RFC draft draft-ietf-idr-route-filter-02.txt</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>neither of the two is supported - current state of mind</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>is that due to the already very efficient policy processing</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>implementation in JUNOS, the suggestions being mentioned</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>in the draft don't justify the implementation effort;</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>/hannes </FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>