<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
Hello J.<br>
<br>
I see two possible solutions for your problem, although I'm not sure, so
let's ask experts for comments...<br>
<br>
1) You could match all the traffic to and from your Customer with an IP filter
(with rate-limit to 20MB) and then try to<br>
apply this filter to the forwarding table. You might need separate routing-instance
to minimize possible hazzard for <br>
other customers (just in case). Here are some <a href="http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos56/swconfig56-policy/html/firewall-config22.html">
clues</a>
for version 5.6.<br>
<br>
2) You could also try to configure both SCU and DCU profiles, match your
Customer's traffic for example by means of BGP communities<br>
(just as if trying to <a href="http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos56/feature-guide-56/html/fg-scu.html">
account it by SCU/DCU</a>
) and then perform rate-limiting based on SCU/DCU, as discussed in January,2003
in this list.<br>
Question is - what value of limit to choose, 20MB?<br>
<br>
Certainly there are limitations:<br>
a) It is impossible to guarantee the even distribution of these 20MB between
interfaces when both demand more than 10MB.<br>
Even worse - if one demands more than 10MB, second might experience packet
drops - which is obviously not what you want.<br>
By the way, your description of what you want is incomplete.<br>
<br>
b) Rate-limiting by IP tends to recognize direction of the traffic (to or
from your Customer) and treat it independently,<br>
which makes it hard to limit traffic to 10MB in both directions. I mean 5MB
to and 5MB from is not the same as 10MB limit on circuit.<br>
Same about SCU/DCU.<br>
<br>
There might be other things I can't see, comments are welcome.<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
Alexander<br>
<br>
<br>
jgrewal wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:00e601c2c5bb$280b9880$72010f0a@host">
<meta content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name="GENERATOR">
<style></style>
<div> </div>
<blockquote dir="Ltr" style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; border-left-width: 2px; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: rgb(0,0,0); margin-right: 0px; ">
<div><br>
</div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Hi Everybody,</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">my question is....can we have one queue
assigned to different interfaces and make that queue work independantly
on each interface??</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Is anybody have any solution to following:</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">We have a customer connected to our
M5 on two sub interfaces and we are running two BGP sessions with him.
His both the circuits are rate limited on sub interfaces to 10 MB. Now
he wants that at any given time if one of the circuit is used less and
other circuit have more bandwidth demand then the second circuit should
be able to use first circuit's bandwidth and vica versa....is this possible
with juniper????its ok if we need to change his circuit to one and then
achive this on ip based rate limit or through queues or any other possible
way.....</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Pls if anybody have some sample configuration
on this ...send me...it would be gr8 help for me....</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">thanks,</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">J.S.Grewal<br>
</font></div>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><br><hr width="90%" size="4"><br>_______________________________________________<br>juniper-nsp mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net">juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net</a><br><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp">http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp</a><br></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>