<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2656.31">
<TITLE>RE: [j-nsp] M20 redundancy config?</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Yeah, perhaps a flag in the system menu - something like 'auto sync on commit' ?</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Sounds like a feature request to me !</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>From: Daniel Roesen [<A HREF="mailto:dr@cluenet.de">mailto:dr@cluenet.de</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Sent: 23 May 2003 13:49</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Subject: Re: [j-nsp] M20 redundancy config?</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 06:13:16AM -0700, billp wrote:</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> I also use "commit sync" when committing configs, and try and</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> do a "request system snapshot" on both RE's individually, </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> occasionally.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I still wonder why that can't be automated...</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Regards,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Daniel</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>_______________________________________________</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2><A HREF="http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp" TARGET="_blank">http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp</A></FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>