From jared at puck.nether.net  Fri May  1 09:59:44 2009
From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 09:59:44 -0400
Subject: [Nsp-qos] is this list dead? :)
Message-ID: <20090501135944.GA65108@puck.nether.net>


	It appears so from my checks.  Should it go away?

	(This message is also meant to induce bounces that will cause auto
unsubscribes by the mail system).

	- Jared

-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared at puck.nether.net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.

From justin at justinshore.com  Fri May  1 10:55:09 2009
From: justin at justinshore.com (Justin Shore)
Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 09:55:09 -0500
Subject: [Nsp-qos] is this list dead? :)
In-Reply-To: <20090501135944.GA65108@puck.nether.net>
References: <20090501135944.GA65108@puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <49FB0D4D.7010708@justinshore.com>

I hope not.  Having just attended the Implementing QoS class in Dallas 
with several other SP engineers from around the Midwest, I would love to 
borrow from my fellow SP engineer's QoS knowledge for my own 
implementations.  Of course if you and I are the only ones on here....

Justin


Jared Mauch wrote:
> 	It appears so from my checks.  Should it go away?
> 
> 	(This message is also meant to induce bounces that will cause auto
> unsubscribes by the mail system).
> 
> 	- Jared
> 

From jared at puck.nether.net  Fri May  1 11:00:36 2009
From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 11:00:36 -0400
Subject: [Nsp-qos] is this list dead? :)
In-Reply-To: <49FB0D4D.7010708@justinshore.com>
References: <20090501135944.GA65108@puck.nether.net>
	<49FB0D4D.7010708@justinshore.com>
Message-ID: <DD6F7FD1-BD27-4638-84E3-E06FF7378762@puck.nether.net>

There are about 400 people here. Enjoy the list.

Jared Mauch

On May 1, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Justin Shore <justin at justinshore.com>  
wrote:

> I hope not.  Having just attended the Implementing QoS class in  
> Dallas with several other SP engineers from around the Midwest, I  
> would love to borrow from my fellow SP engineer's QoS knowledge for  
> my own implementations.  Of course if you and I are the only ones on  
> here....
>
> Justin
>
>
> Jared Mauch wrote:
>>    It appears so from my checks.  Should it go away?
>>    (This message is also meant to induce bounces that will cause auto
>> unsubscribes by the mail system).
>>    - Jared

From ken at kdmd.net  Fri May  1 11:00:04 2009
From: ken at kdmd.net (Ken Diliberto)
Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 08:00:04 -0700
Subject: [Nsp-qos] is this list dead? :)
In-Reply-To: <49FB0D4D.7010708@justinshore.com>
References: <20090501135944.GA65108@puck.nether.net>
	<49FB0D4D.7010708@justinshore.com>
Message-ID: <1241190004.4644.69.camel@neptune>

It's not dead - just mostly dead.  :-)

On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 09:55 -0500, Justin Shore wrote:

> I hope not.  Having just attended the Implementing QoS class in Dallas 
> with several other SP engineers from around the Midwest, I would love to 
> borrow from my fellow SP engineer's QoS knowledge for my own 
> implementations.  Of course if you and I are the only ones on here....
> 
> Justin
> 
> 
> Jared Mauch wrote:
> > 	It appears so from my checks.  Should it go away?
> > 
> > 	(This message is also meant to induce bounces that will cause auto
> > unsubscribes by the mail system).
> > 
> > 	- Jared
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> nsp-qos mailing list
> nsp-qos at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/nsp-qos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/nsp-qos/attachments/20090501/8ebaea24/attachment.html>

From Dan.Brzoska at netqos.com  Fri May  1 12:02:31 2009
From: Dan.Brzoska at netqos.com (Brzoska, Dan)
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 11:02:31 -0500
Subject: [Nsp-qos] is this list dead? :)
In-Reply-To: <1241190004.4644.69.camel@neptune>
References: <20090501135944.GA65108@puck.nether.net>
	<49FB0D4D.7010708@justinshore.com> <1241190004.4644.69.camel@neptune>
Message-ID: <1CBA0608AA69D748B9E247AC376C4E240237B3A39E@ausex1.netqos.local>

It?s getting better!

-Dan

From: nsp-qos-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:nsp-qos-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ken Diliberto
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 10:00 AM
To: nsp-qos at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [Nsp-qos] is this list dead? :)

It's not dead - just mostly dead.  :-)

On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 09:55 -0500, Justin Shore wrote:



I hope not.  Having just attended the Implementing QoS class in Dallas

with several other SP engineers from around the Midwest, I would love to

borrow from my fellow SP engineer's QoS knowledge for my own

implementations.  Of course if you and I are the only ones on here....



Justin





Jared Mauch wrote:

>       It appears so from my checks.  Should it go away?

>

>       (This message is also meant to induce bounces that will cause auto

> unsubscribes by the mail system).

>

>       - Jared

>

_______________________________________________

nsp-qos mailing list

nsp-qos at puck.nether.net<mailto:nsp-qos at puck.nether.net>

https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/nsp-qos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/nsp-qos/attachments/20090501/afef3659/attachment.html>

From paul at paulstewart.org  Fri May  1 12:14:49 2009
From: paul at paulstewart.org (Paul Stewart)
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 12:14:49 -0400
Subject: [Nsp-qos] is this list dead? :)
In-Reply-To: <1241190004.4644.69.camel@neptune>
References: <20090501135944.GA65108@puck.nether.net>	<49FB0D4D.7010708@justinshore.com>
	<1241190004.4644.69.camel@neptune>
Message-ID: <00b101c9ca77$f47e32c0$dd7a9840$@org>

I think there?s lots of folks on here, just no questions lately.. might be wrong ;)

 

From: nsp-qos-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:nsp-qos-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ken Diliberto
Sent: May 1, 2009 11:00 AM
To: nsp-qos at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [Nsp-qos] is this list dead? :)

 

It's not dead - just mostly dead.  :-)

On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 09:55 -0500, Justin Shore wrote: 

 
I hope not.  Having just attended the Implementing QoS class in Dallas 
with several other SP engineers from around the Midwest, I would love to 
borrow from my fellow SP engineer's QoS knowledge for my own 
implementations.  Of course if you and I are the only ones on here....
 
Justin
 
 
Jared Mauch wrote:
>       It appears so from my checks.  Should it go away?
> 
>       (This message is also meant to induce bounces that will cause auto
> unsubscribes by the mail system).
> 
>       - Jared
> 
_______________________________________________
nsp-qos mailing list
nsp-qos at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/nsp-qos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/nsp-qos/attachments/20090501/c1cc17ed/attachment.html>

From christian.martin at teliris.com  Fri May  1 12:27:47 2009
From: christian.martin at teliris.com (Christian Martin)
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 12:27:47 -0400
Subject: [Nsp-qos] is this list dead? :)
In-Reply-To: <00b101c9ca77$f47e32c0$dd7a9840$@org>
References: <20090501135944.GA65108@puck.nether.net>	<49FB0D4D.7010708@justinshore.com>
	<1241190004.4644.69.camel@neptune>
	<00b101c9ca77$f47e32c0$dd7a9840$@org>
Message-ID: <6A0EC6D5-B468-4EA2-B748-7550FBB45744@teliris.com>


Maybe because QoS is dead??  :)



On May 1, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:

> I think there?s lots of folks on here, just no questions lately..  
> might be wrong ;)
>
> From: nsp-qos-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:nsp-qos-bounces at puck.nether.net 
> ] On Behalf Of Ken Diliberto
> Sent: May 1, 2009 11:00 AM
> To: nsp-qos at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [Nsp-qos] is this list dead? :)
>
> It's not dead - just mostly dead.  :-)
>
> On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 09:55 -0500, Justin Shore wrote:
>
> I hope not.  Having just attended the Implementing QoS class in Dallas
> with several other SP engineers from around the Midwest, I would  
> love to
> borrow from my fellow SP engineer's QoS knowledge for my own
> implementations.  Of course if you and I are the only ones on here....
>
> Justin
>
>
> Jared Mauch wrote:
> >       It appears so from my checks.  Should it go away?
> >
> >       (This message is also meant to induce bounces that will  
> cause auto
> > unsubscribes by the mail system).
> >
> >       - Jared
> >
> _______________________________________________
> nsp-qos mailing list
> nsp-qos at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/nsp-qos
> _______________________________________________
> nsp-qos mailing list
> nsp-qos at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/nsp-qos

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/nsp-qos/attachments/20090501/225a190e/attachment-0001.html>

From justin at justinshore.com  Fri May  1 12:53:12 2009
From: justin at justinshore.com (Justin Shore)
Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 11:53:12 -0500
Subject: [Nsp-qos] is this list dead? :)
In-Reply-To: <00b101c9ca77$f47e32c0$dd7a9840$@org>
References: <20090501135944.GA65108@puck.nether.net>	<49FB0D4D.7010708@justinshore.com>	<1241190004.4644.69.camel@neptune>
	<00b101c9ca77$f47e32c0$dd7a9840$@org>
Message-ID: <49FB28F8.4050708@justinshore.com>

Well in that case I may just have to start inundating the list with SP 
QoS questions. :-)  After taking that class I certainly have some 
problems to ponder.



Paul Stewart wrote:
> I think there?s lots of folks on here, just no questions lately.. might 
> be wrong ;)
> 
>  
> 
> *From:* nsp-qos-bounces at puck.nether.net 
> [mailto:nsp-qos-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Ken Diliberto
> *Sent:* May 1, 2009 11:00 AM
> *To:* nsp-qos at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [Nsp-qos] is this list dead? :)
> 
>  
> 
> It's not dead - just mostly dead.  :-)
> 
> On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 09:55 -0500, Justin Shore wrote:
> 
>  
> 
> I hope not.  Having just attended the Implementing QoS class in Dallas 
> 
> with several other SP engineers from around the Midwest, I would love to 
> 
> borrow from my fellow SP engineer's QoS knowledge for my own 
> 
> implementations.  Of course if you and I are the only ones on here....
> 
>  
> 
> Justin
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Jared Mauch wrote:
> 
>>       It appears so from my checks.  Should it go away?
> 
>> 
> 
>>       (This message is also meant to induce bounces that will cause auto
> 
>> unsubscribes by the mail system).
> 
>> 
> 
>>       - Jared
> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> nsp-qos mailing list
> 
> nsp-qos at puck.nether.net <mailto:nsp-qos at puck.nether.net>
> 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/nsp-qos
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nsp-qos mailing list
> nsp-qos at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/nsp-qos

From Charles at thewybles.com  Fri May  1 12:54:50 2009
From: Charles at thewybles.com (Charles at thewybles.com)
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:54:50 +0000
Subject: [Nsp-qos] is this list dead? :)
In-Reply-To: <00b101c9ca77$f47e32c0$dd7a9840$@org>
References: <20090501135944.GA65108@puck.nether.net>	<49FB0D4D.7010708@justinshore.com><1241190004.4644.69.camel@neptune><00b101c9ca77$f47e32c0$dd7a9840$@org>
Message-ID: <1053622252-1241196901-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-561588451-@bxe1197.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>

It has been quiet. Forgot I was even subscribed. 


Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-----Original Message-----
From: "Paul Stewart" <paul at paulstewart.org>

Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 12:14:49 
To: <nsp-qos at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [Nsp-qos] is this list dead? :)


_______________________________________________
nsp-qos mailing list
nsp-qos at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/nsp-qos



From Charles at thewybles.com  Fri May  1 12:57:50 2009
From: Charles at thewybles.com (Charles at thewybles.com)
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:57:50 +0000
Subject: [Nsp-qos] is this list dead? :)
In-Reply-To: <49FB28F8.4050708@justinshore.com>
References: <20090501135944.GA65108@puck.nether.net>	<49FB0D4D.7010708@justinshore.com>	<1241190004.4644.69.camel@neptune><00b101c9ca77$f47e32c0$dd7a9840$@org><49FB28F8.4050708@justinshore.com>
Message-ID: <766533358-1241197082-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-327535896-@bxe1197.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>

Please do! 
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-----Original Message-----
From: Justin Shore <justin at justinshore.com>

Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 11:53:12 
To: Paul Stewart<paul at paulstewart.org>
Cc: <nsp-qos at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [Nsp-qos] is this list dead? :)


Well in that case I may just have to start inundating the list with SP 
QoS questions. :-)  After taking that class I certainly have some 
problems to ponder.



Paul Stewart wrote:
> I think there?s lots of folks on here, just no questions lately.. might 
> be wrong ;)
> 
>  
> 
> *From:* nsp-qos-bounces at puck.nether.net 
> [mailto:nsp-qos-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Ken Diliberto
> *Sent:* May 1, 2009 11:00 AM
> *To:* nsp-qos at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [Nsp-qos] is this list dead? :)
> 
>  
> 
> It's not dead - just mostly dead.  :-)
> 
> On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 09:55 -0500, Justin Shore wrote:
> 
>  
> 
> I hope not.  Having just attended the Implementing QoS class in Dallas 
> 
> with several other SP engineers from around the Midwest, I would love to 
> 
> borrow from my fellow SP engineer's QoS knowledge for my own 
> 
> implementations.  Of course if you and I are the only ones on here....
> 
>  
> 
> Justin
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Jared Mauch wrote:
> 
>>       It appears so from my checks.  Should it go away?
> 
>> 
> 
>>       (This message is also meant to induce bounces that will cause auto
> 
>> unsubscribes by the mail system).
> 
>> 
> 
>>       - Jared
> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> nsp-qos mailing list
> 
> nsp-qos at puck.nether.net <mailto:nsp-qos at puck.nether.net>
> 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/nsp-qos
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nsp-qos mailing list
> nsp-qos at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/nsp-qos
_______________________________________________
nsp-qos mailing list
nsp-qos at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/nsp-qos