Eric,
>> >Is there any other technique that allows one to have more control over the
>> >traffic that can be mapped into an MPLS tunnel? (Say by specifying an
>> >access list to map the traffic, or by using other IP header fields etc.?)
>>
>> Sure, policy based routing. You match packets based on
>> criteria you define, then you "shunt" the matched packets
>> across the LSP (out the Tunnel interface).
>
>you can also do forwarding-adjacency if you run ISIS; very similar to
>autoroute, though, and doesn't really solve any additional problems.
Definitely, although it should also be clarified that neither
forwarding-adjacency nor autoroute matches packets on stuff
like IP header fields, source addr, etc :-) ... and that
"forwarding-adjacency" makes the LSP known as a link to all
routers in the cloud (similar to juniper, which can also do it
in OSPF), whereas autoroute just makes the LSP known only to
the local routing instance.
Sean
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:11:57 EDT