Re: [nsp] Max arp table size

From: Matt Buford (matt@overloaded.net)
Date: Thu May 23 2002 - 18:00:32 EDT

Next message: Gert Doering: "Re: [nsp] Re[2]: Which IOS"
Previous message: Cisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team: "[nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: ATA-186 Password Disclosure Vulnerability"
In reply to: Matt Buford: "[nsp] Max arp table size"
Next in thread: Alex Rubenstein: "Re: [nsp] Max arp table size"
Reply: Alex Rubenstein: "Re: [nsp] Max arp table size"
Reply: Alex Rubenstein: "Re: [nsp] Max arp table size"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I think I just found the answer to my own question. Referring to
sup2/pfc2/msfc2:

"The FIB and adjacency tables are capable of storing 256K entries each."

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Buford" <matt@overloaded.net>
To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:02 PM
Subject: [nsp] Max arp table size

> Anyone know the maximum ARP table size on a 6500 MSFC2? If there is no
hard
> limit, at what point is it likely to start causing problems? I've run
with
> up to about 30k, and I'm wondering if perhaps I'm going to run into
problems
> at 32k, 64k, or beyond...
>
>

Next message: Gert Doering: "Re: [nsp] Re[2]: Which IOS"
Previous message: Cisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team: "[nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: ATA-186 Password Disclosure Vulnerability"
In reply to: Matt Buford: "[nsp] Max arp table size"
Next in thread: Alex Rubenstein: "Re: [nsp] Max arp table size"
Reply: Alex Rubenstein: "Re: [nsp] Max arp table size"
Reply: Alex Rubenstein: "Re: [nsp] Max arp table size"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:11:58 EDT