The FIB, the adjacency table, or both? I thought it was just the FIB, in
which case there's still room for 256K entries in the adjacency table.
Either way, my worries about 64K ARP entries were apparently unfounded.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Rubenstein" <alex@nac.net>
To: "Matt Buford" <matt@overloaded.net>
Cc: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: [nsp] Max arp table size
>
> Except when using RPF. It cuts in in half.
>
>
>
> On Thu, 23 May 2002, Matt Buford wrote:
>
> > I think I just found the answer to my own question. Referring to
> > sup2/pfc2/msfc2:
> >
> > "The FIB and adjacency tables are capable of storing 256K entries each."
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Matt Buford" <matt@overloaded.net>
> > To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 3:02 PM
> > Subject: [nsp] Max arp table size
> >
> >
> > > Anyone know the maximum ARP table size on a 6500 MSFC2? If there is
no
> > hard
> > > limit, at what point is it likely to start causing problems? I've run
> > with
> > > up to about 30k, and I'm wondering if perhaps I'm going to run into
> > problems
> > > at 32k, 64k, or beyond...
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex@nac.net, latency, Al Reuben --
> -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:11:58 EDT