Re: [nsp] ATM/IMA and Multilink-group

From: Dan Hollis (goemon@anime.net)
Date: Tue May 28 2002 - 18:29:56 EDT

Next message: kevin graham: "Re: [nsp] ATM/IMA and Multilink-group"
Previous message: kevin graham: "Re: Problems with VPN connection between WatchGuard Firebox II si Cis co Router 2621."
In reply to: Stephen Sprunk: "Re: [nsp] ATM/IMA and Multilink-group"
Next in thread: kevin graham: "Re: [nsp] ATM/IMA and Multilink-group"
Reply: kevin graham: "Re: [nsp] ATM/IMA and Multilink-group"
Reply: kevin graham: "Re: [nsp] ATM/IMA and Multilink-group"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Tue, 28 May 2002, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> Don't use MLPPP; just load-balance across the two IMA groups.

Cisco MLPPP is broken over IMA groups?

-Dan

-- 
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]

Next message: kevin graham: "Re: [nsp] ATM/IMA and Multilink-group"
Previous message: kevin graham: "Re: Problems with VPN connection between WatchGuard Firebox II si Cis co Router 2621."
In reply to: Stephen Sprunk: "Re: [nsp] ATM/IMA and Multilink-group"
Next in thread: kevin graham: "Re: [nsp] ATM/IMA and Multilink-group"
Reply: kevin graham: "Re: [nsp] ATM/IMA and Multilink-group"
Reply: kevin graham: "Re: [nsp] ATM/IMA and Multilink-group"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:11:58 EDT