[nsp] CISCO-PROCESS-MIB

• Next message: Stephen Gill: "RE: [nsp] eBGP multihop - how to count?"
• Previous message: Harold Ritter: "Re: [nsp] eBGP establishment"
• Next in thread: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki: "[nsp] CISCO-PROCESS-MIB"
• Maybe reply: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki: "[nsp] CISCO-PROCESS-MIB"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

All,

I am trying to monitor memory utilization and CPU impact of some
key IOS processes.

Unfortunately, iterating through all process table, each and every
time I will need to retrieve values for process I can identify
by name (for example "BGP Router"), but I don't know index in
cpmProcessTable, is far from being optimal.

Hence my question -- how persistent are entries in cpmProcessTable?

Can I assume, that as long as configuration of the box has not been
changed, specific process will be represented by entry with the same
index in cpmProcessTable?

Can I build a cache, which will be invalidated any time something
like ccmHistoryRunningLastChanged is changed?

Is there any heuristic available?

Thanks a lot for your assistance,

Przemek

• Next message: Stephen Gill: "RE: [nsp] eBGP multihop - how to count?"
• Previous message: Harold Ritter: "Re: [nsp] eBGP establishment"
• Next in thread: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki: "[nsp] CISCO-PROCESS-MIB"
• Maybe reply: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki: "[nsp] CISCO-PROCESS-MIB"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:00 EDT