[nsp] cisco voip/gatekeeper

• Next message: Philip Smith: "Re: [nsp] BGP load balancing depends of bandwitdth"
• Previous message: Zaheer Aziz: "Re: [nsp] BGP load balancing depends of bandwitdth"
• Next in thread: Michal Mertl: "Re: [nsp] cisco voip/gatekeeper"
• Reply: Michal Mertl: "Re: [nsp] cisco voip/gatekeeper"
• Maybe reply: Alex Rubenstein: "[nsp] cisco voip/gatekeeper"
• Reply: Michal Mertl: "Re: [nsp] cisco voip/gatekeeper"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I am looking for some basic pointers on using a cisco gatekeeper (3600) in
a simple, class-4 arbitrage environment.

My questions centralize on the ability to have gateways register thier
endpoints with the gatekeeper, and having the gatekeeper make a
intelligent routing decision for the call based upon this endpoint
registration, rather than a dial-plan.

Anyone got some examples, clues, etc?

Thanks.

-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex@nac.net, latency, Al Reuben --
-- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --

• Next message: Philip Smith: "Re: [nsp] BGP load balancing depends of bandwitdth"
• Previous message: Zaheer Aziz: "Re: [nsp] BGP load balancing depends of bandwitdth"
• Next in thread: Michal Mertl: "Re: [nsp] cisco voip/gatekeeper"
• Reply: Michal Mertl: "Re: [nsp] cisco voip/gatekeeper"
• Maybe reply: Alex Rubenstein: "[nsp] cisco voip/gatekeeper"
• Reply: Michal Mertl: "Re: [nsp] cisco voip/gatekeeper"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:01 EDT