On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 07:42:49PM -0400, McMaster, Jay wrote:
> -><rant on>
> ->
> ->I would say that 12.0S *used to be* very good. Around
> ->12.0(17)S/S1. Haven't
> ->seen a worthy release since then. :( (I'm talking 12K, 7500
> ->and 7200 here).
>
> <rant continue>
>
> 12.0.17ST with RPR+ for the 12K...great feature and part of what became
> known as SSO. the only problem was if a few vty's were busy and someone did
> a "wr mem", the box reloaded and the config was blown off. 12.0.18S3 has
> been stable for us. holding out for 12.0.22S and we'll probably let that
> bake for six months before we touch it.
>
> </rant continue>
12.0(21)S2/S3 work quite well in my experience.
I share the concern about the baking process of 22S though. I
am worried it will not be initally sour but turn that way rapidly.
- jared
-- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:03 EDT