Re: [nsp] To S or not to S?

From: Larry Rosenman (ler@lerctr.org)
Date: Tue Jul 02 2002 - 21:28:03 EDT

Next message: MPLS Newbie: "[nsp] VPN-MIB"
Previous message: 'Dmitri Kalintsev': "Re: [nsp] To S or not to S?"
In reply to: 'Dmitri Kalintsev': "Re: [nsp] To S or not to S?"
Next in thread: Larry Rosenman: "Re: [nsp] To S or not to S?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 20:06, 'Dmitri Kalintsev' wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 08:29:06PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
> >
> > 12.0(21)S2/S3 work quite well in my experience.
>
> CSCdx35920 - where latcency measurements are unrealistic when BGP is
> running on the source router. First found in 12.0(18)S01.
>
> As well, TurboACL recalculation blows memory up on VIP2-40's (we employ
> some farly large access lists).
There is a fix for this supposedly in 12.0(22)S. Waiting patiently....

[snip]

-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

Next message: MPLS Newbie: "[nsp] VPN-MIB"
Previous message: 'Dmitri Kalintsev': "Re: [nsp] To S or not to S?"
In reply to: 'Dmitri Kalintsev': "Re: [nsp] To S or not to S?"
Next in thread: Larry Rosenman: "Re: [nsp] To S or not to S?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:03 EDT