RE: [nsp] Interface Routing

From: Stephane Gingras (stephane.gingras@cgi.com)
Date: Fri Jul 12 2002 - 13:54:19 EDT


Exactly,

I whant ip routing enabled because I whant thes 2 interfaces to route with
the other interfaces. It just in between the 2 that I don't whant routing.
Do you have any example.

Thank's

-----Message d'origine-----
De : David Sinn [mailto:dsinn@microsoft.com]
Envoye : 12 juillet, 2002 13:33
A : Jared Mauch; Stephane Gingras
Cc : cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Objet : RE: [nsp] Interface Routing

I guess along the lines of Jared's response, I'd have to ask "To what
end?"

If you want the box to just be on the networks in question and not do
anything else, then turning off routing will solve your problem.

If you want to have two interfaces on a box and not allow any traffic to
go between them, but do allow it to others, then you should look at
ACL's.

Also this assumes you are talking about IP routing.

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared@puck.nether.net]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 8:49 AM
To: Stephane Gingras
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [nsp] Interface Routing

        conf t
        no ip routing

        - jared

On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 11:31:22AM -0400, Stephane Gingras wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for a configuration example to be able to have 2
specifique
> interfaces/networks on 1 router to not be able to route between them.
>
> Thanks
>

--
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only
mine.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:04 EDT